Re: Because, David...
> > Radio is every bit as much of an art as it is a business.
> > You can type until you are blue in the face about how
> Oldies
> > did not make money, blah blah blah... CBS FM could not do
>
> > it, blah blah blah... the numbers say it will not work,
> blah
> > blah blah...
>
> Radio is a business. If a company or one individual owner
> has a $400 million dollar asset, they are not going to be
> happy to se it in decline. CBS FM declined over 20% in 25-54
> numbers since this Millenium started, and billing is down
> against a market increase by a spread of nearly 40%.
> Horrible. Time to change. Leaky roof.
> >
> > The problem is, we are not talking about a Polka format,
> or
> > a some kind of abstract dance format. We are talking about
>
> > Oldies in the traditional Top 40 delivery. And, again, we
>
> > are not talking about East Podunk (with apologies to those
>
> > who live in East Podunk), we are taking about the biggest
> > radio and television market in the United States of
> America
>
> I don't care if the station is in Durban, SA. If it is not
> delivering any more, and the advertisers don't want it, it
> is time to change.
> >
> > Let me ask you something, what if Z100 were to drop Top 40
>
> > today, and there was no more top 40 in New York City. The
> > numbers all said that Top 40 was dead (and please, do not
> go
> > quoting me numbers and research about CHR). Does that mean
>
> > that there would be no more Top 40 stations in New York
> City
> > forever? I don't think so.
>
> In my opinion, hip hop and rhythmic is the CHR of today.
> There is very little interest in the kind of CHR that
> created the Backstreets any more. And alternative is
> becomeing a CHR niche, not a mainstream play.
>
> So, if Z 100 were to change formats (not likely based on
> ratings and billing) I would say they simply read the cards
> for the future and decided to beat the odds by getting out
> of a future of decline.
>
> There is too much insistence on putting names on formats. A
> listener does not listen to a station because it is format
> A, B or C. They listen because they like the station and its
> music. Who cares what it is called. I could call a station
> "American hodge-podge" and name it "Asparagus 107" and if
> the music was right, a group of listeners would come,
> despite what I called the fomrat or the station. Names are
> irrelevant.
> >
> > David, honestly, I do not care what all your research
> says.
> > Just because CBS FM could not survive does not mean that
> (a
> > non-Jack delieverty) Oldies will not come back. I see no
> > reason why Clear-channel wouldn't try it.
>
> The market conditions are the same for CCU as for Infinity.
> The 25-54 appeal of the format is rapidly declining, and the
> rating sreflect it. Every year, there will be less potential
> for attracting advertisers and listeners that advertisers
> care about. If that is reasearch, so be it. I believe it is
> reality. You can't sail in the doldurms.
> >
> > I remember, once a upon a time there were no Coutry
> stations
> > in New York City either, and that didn't last. There were
> no
> > disco station in New York, now there are two.
>
> Formats come and go or evolve depending on listener
> interest.
> >
> > The Jack FM format is too abstract and too experimental to
>
> > pre-empt any other stations from comming on.
>
> Too experimental? It's #1 English 25-54 in LA, and popped to
> the top in June in Seattle, for example. The songs are all
> hits. It has logic. It may not wear as well as the long run
> of 60's oldies, but who cares?
> >
> > Yes, I agree, it IS possible for Oldies to come back, not
> > just to the suburbs, but to New York City.
> > Just MHO.
>
> Research is just another term for "talking to the
> listeners." Not listening to research is the same as
> ignoring the wishes and needs of the listeners.
>
> Anyone who consults with listeners and knows where the money
> is will know oldies is an unlikely return.
>
Unfortunatley David is right with pretty much everything he says Garrett. Radio is an art, but the business part over powers it. As David said, if the station is losing a lot of money, it is time for a change. In this issue, advertisers have a lot of power. Like Michael B. said below, "reality sucks" or something like that. That is what he meant.
<P ID="signature">______________
</P>