• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

SUMMER 2011 RATINGS - SPORTS HUB vs. WEEI

dumber than a box of hair said:
karsonwithak said:
Not sure how I was insulting anyone's intelligence, just trying offer a possible scenario. Since the ratings still sit on this board, it seems like a plausible explanation. Maybe you have a better idea?

Your honor: Move to strike as unresponsive.

Still waiting for you to tell us what other company does radio ratings in the Boston market.

You can hire any research firm to produce numbers.

The numbers have been removed by the moderators because, surprise surprise, IT'S NOT ALLOWED. Rankers are allowed, that's why they're still up, and that's why you only see rankers in the papers. It's allowed.
 
dumber than a box of hair said:
reelyreal said:
You can hire any research firm to produce numbers.

Still haven't answered the question. If those quoted (and removed) figures weren't Arbitron's, whose were they?

That was never your question. your question was:

dumber than a box of hair said:
Still waiting for you to tell us what other company does radio ratings in the Boston market.

So I told you.

Ever hear of a hypothetical question? That's what was posed. A hypothetical question. Chill.
 
Because we're provincial...you'd think they'd at least put these playoffs on the AM and do talk on FM
or vice versa. Or run the game on WRKO. The other night they (93.7/850) did run Yankees-Tigers; a poss. elimination game but Yanks
won and now both teams have a game 5 Thu night...I believe both NLDS series will have a game
5 Fri night.

If you don't have XM, TBS etc there are ways to get the game. At work, in the break room, I can pick
up Phillies on WPHT 1210, Yankees on WCBS 880 or WPOP 1410, and ESPN on some frequencies etc

WEEI may wind up running a few ALCS or NLCS games, World Series, etc. Thanks to labor troubles
there may not be Celtics games in the way of doing that...
 
dumber than a box of hair said:
Signpost said:
Tom Taylor's daily email even referenced this thread for it's specific rating breakouts. If the Globe & Herald can print that information, why shouldn't it be posted on this board?

The Globe and Herald violate Arbitron's copyrights by reproducing data they have no right to publish, so this board should too?

News flash: Two wrongs don't make a right.

Whoa, whoa calm down there. The papers list which place each station fell in the three main demos. For example "Felger was first 29-54, Big Show was 8th". They don't give out the actual numbers. This practice is not in violation of Arbitron's policy.
 
dumber than a box of hair said:
karsonwithak said:
Not sure how I was insulting anyone's intelligence, just trying offer a possible scenario. Since the ratings still sit on this board, it seems like a plausible explanation. Maybe you have a better idea?

Your honor: Move to strike as unresponsive.

Still waiting for you to tell us what other company does radio ratings in the Boston market.

http://www.eastlanratings.com/default.aspx

Next question?
 
EnterCommunicator said:
ArtSpooner said:
We see the total numbers and WEEI is ahead, but Kalendar's numbers tell a different story, which makes his/her credibility suspect.

Except that the Globe & Herald confirm the rating demo scores as well. They just don't list the numbers.
Chad Finn and Jessica Heslam are both WEEI haters. I attach even less credibility to anything they write. It's the same as when Ron Borges writes anything about Belichick........a definite agenda.
 
dumber than a box of hair said:
Signpost said:
Tom Taylor's daily email even referenced this thread for it's specific rating breakouts. If the Globe & Herald can print that information, why shouldn't it be posted on this board?

The Globe and Herald violate Arbitron's copyrights by reproducing data they have no right to publish, so this board should too?

News flash: Two wrongs don't make a right.

It is not a violation of copyright to publish information. Arbitrons are protected contractually, not by federal copyright.
 
dyeingeye said:
dumber than a box of hair said:
Signpost said:
Tom Taylor's daily email even referenced this thread for it's specific rating breakouts. If the Globe & Herald can print that information, why shouldn't it be posted on this board?

The Globe and Herald violate Arbitron's copyrights by reproducing data they have no right to publish, so this board should too?

News flash: Two wrongs don't make a right.

It is not a violation of copyright to publish information. Arbitrons are protected contractually, not by federal copyright.

Actually, Arbitron's estimates are protected by federal copyright. Some limited copyrighted data can be used by the news media under the fair use agreement.

http://www.arbitron.com/downloads/copyrights.pdf
 
reelyreal said:
dyeingeye said:
dumber than a box of hair said:
Signpost said:
Tom Taylor's daily email even referenced this thread for it's specific rating breakouts. If the Globe & Herald can print that information, why shouldn't it be posted on this board?

The Globe and Herald violate Arbitron's copyrights by reproducing data they have no right to publish, so this board should too?

News flash: Two wrongs don't make a right.

It is not a violation of copyright to publish information. Arbitrons are protected contractually, not by federal copyright.

Actually, Arbitron's estimates are protected by federal copyright. Some limited copyrighted data can be used by the news media under the fair use agreement.

http://www.arbitron.com/downloads/copyrights.pdf

Arbitron can say all it wants, but it doesn't change the law that facts are not protected by copyright. If Arbitron ever tried to sue a newspaper for copyright infringement for publishing their ratings, the case would be dismissed before you could blink an eye.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom