Radio_Realist said:
"This is a Pittsburugh radio board gentlemen."
And you're proud to own a station in Tennessee. So what?
"Nobody cares about your opinions of what polka music should or shouldn't be called."
It is that narrow minded lack of vision and unwillingness to pursue discussions where they may go that typifies why radio in Pittsburgh is so bad. The only reason why any station in Pittsburgh succeeds is that it only has to be better than the other Pittsburgh radio stations. That's not difficult.
If Mr. Lash owns one station in Tennessee, then that's at least one more than you, Mr. Realist. Why must every message from you contain a cheap shot at someone else's qualifications?
Yes, the only reason why "any station in Pittsburgh succeeds" is because it is better than the other Pittsburgh radio stations. Welcome to capitalism! The only reason that
any business succeeds is that it is better than its competitors. To quote a punchline from a famous joke: "I don't have to run faster than the lion. I just have to run faster than you."
Also: Before the discussion was moved, you were discoursing on the "Ibo, Bantu, Tutsi, (and) Zulu" tribes of Africa and "Negroes" (to use your word). How do you reach the conclusion that "the unwillingness to pursue" such a discussion "typifies why radio in Pittsburgh is so bad"?
It typifies no such thing --- the discussion was irrelevant! Any businessman who insists upon "pursuing" irrelevant discussions instead of focusing on
actual trends and issues in his industry will have plenty of time to "pursue" those discussions from a pub stool or at the labour exchange once he's made redundant.
Not to mention the fact that "Negro" hasn't been in general circulation since President Lyndon Johnson left office, and I suspect if I tried using that term in Pittsburgh or any other American city, I'd get a right punch up the head, "political correctness" be d--ned.