Air conditioning can be a tough battle. I have worked in just about every possible scenario:
• no AC, no blower (really bad!!);
• no AC, with a blower to the outside, and no transmitter ductwork (free-standing);
• no AC, with a blower to the outside via ductwork at output of transmitter;
• no AC, with ductwork from outside to intake of transmitter, along with a blower to the outside via ductwork at output of transmitter;
• AC with a blower (free-standing transmitter);
• AC, with a blower to the outside via ductwork at output of transmitter;
• closed-loop AC (free-standing transmitter).
The ductwork can work well, but will be a BAD thing if it in ANY way constricts the ability of the transmitter to blow heated air exhaust out. A blower, while useful in such situations, will most certainly result in disaster if it fails, as it will result in constriction of air flow.
As for ACs, I've seen everything from residential window ACs (trade outs!) to dual-redundant industrial ACs.
IMHO, the last example above, closed loop AC, while the most expensive, is the best, mainly because it is the cleanest.
It's a given that you have to get rid of the transmitter-created heat, along with fighting additional outside heat. But bringing in outside air has serious side effects, the most important of which is the amount of dirt that is brought in by incoming air that is replacing the air blown outside by the blower. Never mind that that air may be really hot, and useless for cooling.
By creating a closed-loop, and exchanging heat externally, the overall cooling efficiency is a bit lower than typical AC but you can keep dirt WAY down because you're not bringing it in in the first place. When your filtering requirements are only for re-circulated air, the filter can be a static-electricity type, which will remove even the finest dust particles. You couldn't use this type of filter with outside air, because it would soon be overwhelmed.
When the transmitter's air is clean, its efficiency does not deteriorate as when it accumulates a layer of dust on internal parts. So long-term transmitter reliability goes way up. Maintenance requirements for closed loop are nearly the same as for traditional AC, but the need for transmitter maintenance can be greatly reduced.
In the interest of absolute reliability, you can of course have a blower as an automatic backup in case of AC failure.
The reason I'm so gung-ho about this type of system is that the first time I ever visited a closed-loop installation, I was simply amazed at the cleanliness of the entire operation. It was in one of the rooms at the World Trade Center. The CE told me he had never had to clean out the transmitter! You could have eaten off the sparkling interior of the PA cavity. This, in direct contrast to the non-closed-loop AC I had at Z100 at the Empire State Building, where fine black dust coated everything.
While I hate to generalize, and I realize that in many cases the capital simply isn't available for such an investment, when it is, closed loop is highly recommended.
One final word: if you can afford a good system, you can also afford to have an expert design it. Unless you have experience in HVAC, outside help can prevent mistakes that can have long-term consequences.
Kind Regards,
David