• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Supergold on air anymore?

M

mojavewolfpup

Guest
Is supergold ever coming back to a las vegas non clear channel station? (clear channel is awful here)

I'd like to know if there is a (again, non clear channel) station online playing them. linked on www.supergold.net is clear channel stations.

Sadly, I get the impression the few times I heard supergold recently is that is sliding towards the "crocodile rock" format of oldies radio which is sickening to see. Apparently there is no good music that exists before 1965.

Any Mike Harvey news?
 
Supergold

Most currently successful Oldies stations have moved away from '50s and into the '70s. Deal with it. It's either evolve and update or get nuked- what part of that is so hard for so many to understand?


>
> Sadly, I get the impression the few times I heard supergold
> recently is that is sliding towards the "crocodile rock"
> format of oldies radio which is sickening to see. Apparently
> there is no good music that exists before 1965.
>
> Any Mike Harvey news?
>
 
Supergold

Supergold and oldies are relative terms that will always change as time passes.

> Most currently successful Oldies stations have moved away
> from '50s and into the '70s. Deal with it. It's either
> evolve and update or get nuked- what part of that is so hard
> for so many to understand?
>
> >
> > Sadly, I get the impression the few times I heard
> > supergold recently is that is sliding towards the "crocodile rock"
> > format of oldies radio which is sickening to see. Apparently
> > there is no good music that exists before 1965.
> >
> > Any Mike Harvey news?
 
Supergold

And, the point would be- what???

> Supergold and oldies are relative terms that will always change as time
> passes.
>


> > Most currently successful Oldies stations have moved away
> > from '50s and into the '70s. Deal with it. It's either
> > evolve and update or get nuked- what part of that is so
> hard for so many to understand?
> >
> > >
> > > Sadly, I get the impression the few times I heard
> > > supergold recently is that is sliding towards the
> "crocodile rock"
> > > format of oldies radio which is sickening to see.
> Apparently there is no good music that exists before 1965.
> > >
> > > Any Mike Harvey news?
>
 
Supergold

If you don't get the point you obviously do not understand radio.

> And, the point would be- what???
>
> > Supergold and oldies are relative terms that will always
> change as time
> > passes.
>
> > > Most currently successful Oldies stations have moved
> away
> > > from '50s and into the '70s. Deal with it. It's either
>
> > > evolve and update or get nuked- what part of that is so
> > hard for so many to understand?
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Sadly, I get the impression the few times I heard
> > > > supergold recently is that is sliding towards the
> > "crocodile rock"
> > > > format of oldies radio which is sickening to see.
> > Apparently there is no good music that exists before 1965.
>
> > > >
> > > > Any Mike Harvey news?
> >
>
 
sheesh

One must actually make a point for others to understand it.



> If you don't get the point you obviously do not understand radio.
>
> > And, the point would be- what???
> >
> > > Supergold and oldies are relative terms that will always
> > change as time passes.
> >
> > > > Most currently successful Oldies stations have moved
> > away from '50s and into the '70s. Deal with it. It's either
> > > > evolve and update or get nuked- what part of that is so
> > > hard for so many to understand?
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Sadly, I get the impression the few times I heard
> > > > > supergold recently is that is sliding towards the
> > > "crocodile rock"
> > > > > format of oldies radio which is sickening to see.
> > > Apparently there is no good music that exists before
> 1965.
> >
> > > > >
> > > > > Any Mike Harvey news?
> > >
> >
>
 
Re: Supergold

My, my, my Oldiescat. I hope you fix that temperment of yours before your loved one joins you for Valentines tonight. Oh sorry, possibly that's the problem. Anyway, lets go ahead and fix your original statement.

"Most currently successful Oldies stations have moved away from '50s and into the '70s. Deal with it "OR ORDER SIRIUS OR XM. THE 50'S AND 60'S ARE ALIVE AND WELL ON SATELLITE!!!!

Happy Valantines day Oldiescat.
 
Re: sheesh

> > One must actually make a point for others to understand
> it.
> >
>
> True.
>
Sheesh, I understood the point he was making. Maybe he needs to explain his point privately to YOU guys.
 
> Is supergold ever coming back to a las vegas non clear
> channel station? (clear channel is awful here)
>
> I'd like to know if there is a (again, non clear channel)
> station online playing them. linked on www.supergold.net is
> clear channel stations.
>
> Sadly, I get the impression the few times I heard supergold
> recently is that is sliding towards the "crocodile rock"
> format of oldies radio which is sickening to see. Apparently
> there is no good music that exists before 1965.
>
> Any Mike Harvey news?
>
WIZD Rudolph, WI runs Supergold I think.

I'm not a big fan of the 70s either. Most of the music is just dull. Especially that slow Eagles, CSNY, stuff.

The 50s-60s were more of a feel good era.<P ID="signature">______________

</P>
 
Re: Supergold

> "OR ORDER SIRIUS
> OR XM. THE 50'S AND 60'S ARE ALIVE AND WELL ON SATELLITE!!!!
>

Along side of many other genres of music that attract audiences too small to be commercially viable. Comparing terrestrial & satellite radio formats are apples & oranges. XM or Sirius has your $13/mo...they neither know nor care what you're listening to.
 
Re: Supergold

> [XM or Sirius has your $13/mo...they neither know nor care
> what you're listening to.]



They know and care what I'M listening to because they respond to my e-mails. This is unlike my former favorite commercial radio station, which doesn't even list an e-mail address on their website. Here's the way I see it: commercial radio is a Pimp, the advertiser is the John, and the listener is the Ho. I'd rather spend $13 a month on satellite than be a Ho for some commercial radio station.
<P ID="edit"><FONT class="small">Edited by TheFonz on 02/15/06 06:44 AM.</FONT></P>
 
Supergold

Has nothing to do with temperment. It's just that the "oldies today suck" whine is sooooooooo old.

NEWS FLASH: Oldies stations who've held onto the '50s too long are dying. Those who've wised-up and evolved (as every successful radio format has) are doing well.

If you want '50s, XM or Sirius or CDs are fine- but this "radio sucks because they've abandoned the '50s" is denial, since there's no future (ad dollars) marketing to people over 60 years of age. That's not MY OPINION- that's just the way it is. I don't like it any more than many of you but I'm not going to stick my head in the sand and cry about no more doo wop on the radio.

Radio is a business- just like any business, there's no sense in staying open if customers aren't coming through the door. Satellite or iPods are not the saviours of '50s music- just an option to a few thousand nationwide who can't live without their '50s music.


> My, my, my Oldiescat. I hope you fix that temperment of
> yours before your loved one joins you for Valentines
> tonight. Oh sorry, possibly that's the problem. Anyway, lets
> go ahead and fix your original statement.
>
> "Most currently successful Oldies stations have moved away
> from '50s and into the '70s. Deal with it "OR ORDER SIRIUS
> OR XM. THE 50'S AND 60'S ARE ALIVE AND WELL ON SATELLITE!!!!
>
>
> Happy Valantines day Oldiescat.
>
 
Supergold

well, then- enjoy.

BTW, have you also given up commercial television (only watch PPV or On-Demand)? I see you're on the 'Net- how do you get around advertising here?



>
> They know and care what I'M listening to because they
> respond to my e-mails. This is unlike my former favorite
> commercial radio station, which doesn't even list an e-mail
> address on their website. Here's the way I see it:
> commercial radio is a Pimp, the advertiser is the John, and
> the listener is the Ho. I'd rather spend $13 a month on
> satellite than be a Ho for some commercial radio station.
>
 
OK,

Great- what WAS his point (in response to my post)?


> >
> Sheesh, I understood the point he was making. Maybe he
> needs to explain his point privately to YOU guys.
>
 
Re: Supergold

I read the initial post diffrently than you. I saw a question, and an observation about supergold. He/she also linked to Mike Harvey's web page. So I automatically read the question as a request on Mike Harveys program availibilty in Las Vegas. The following posts start beating up this poor poster about the whining about how todays oldies "suck". I instead saw him/her complaing about Clear Channel. Maybe I read his/her post wrong, but that is how I interpreted it.

I look at this board as a common site on the internet to discuss oldies, wherever the source. Yes, we have beat up terrestial oldies to death. We all agree it "sucks" for a variety of reasons. We also have those on this site that feel that since satellite only pulls in 1-2% share, they should not be discussed. (but if anyone is old enough to remember ESPN when it started in 1978, or CNN and the disparinging comments that followed). But if someone posts a question about an oldies music source, I would like to discuss it further with him/her instead of beating them up.

Someone else posted about a year ago about setting up some type of oldies listening source (I belive it was broadband) and listening to them in their living room. A frequent poster on this board (who shall go nameless but frequent readers will know who it is) responed about how foolish it would be to listen to oldies music from 56 - 63 in your living room on a Saturday night. I'm probably not getting all the facts correct, but I remenber thinking, how unfortunate for this frequent poster to immediately go into a brain dump without encouraging a discussion on Oldies.

We all have our backgrounds and music biases. But this board is about oldies, whatever the concerns.

> Has nothing to do with temperment. It's just that the
> "oldies today suck" whine is sooooooooo old.
>
> NEWS FLASH: Oldies stations who've held onto the '50s too
> long are dying. Those who've wised-up and evolved (as every
> successful radio format has) are doing well.
>
> If you want '50s, XM or Sirius or CDs are fine- but this
> "radio sucks because they've abandoned the '50s" is denial,
> since there's no future (ad dollars) marketing to people
> over 60 years of age. That's not MY OPINION- that's just
> the way it is. I don't like it any more than many of you
> but I'm not going to stick my head in the sand and cry about
> no more doo wop on the radio.
>
> Radio is a business- just like any business, there's no
> sense in staying open if customers aren't coming through the
> door. Satellite or iPods are not the saviours of '50s
> music- just an option to a few thousand nationwide who can't
> live without their '50s music.
>
>
> > My, my, my Oldiescat. I hope you fix that temperment of
> > yours before your loved one joins you for Valentines
> > tonight. Oh sorry, possibly that's the problem. Anyway,
> lets
> > go ahead and fix your original statement.
> >
> > "Most currently successful Oldies stations have moved away
>
> > from '50s and into the '70s. Deal with it "OR ORDER SIRIUS
>
> > OR XM. THE 50'S AND 60'S ARE ALIVE AND WELL ON
> SATELLITE!!!!
> >
> >
> > Happy Valantines day Oldiescat.
> >
>
 
oldies

Actually, the original poster is the one who was whining about "there must be no good music before 1965" and slamming "crocodile rock" music, etc. It's OK for us to challenge them because I personally do not think all Oldies radio (terrestrial) sucks. What sucks is this "oldies radio is over since the '50s are gone" drone that gets so old. I stated my opinion in my response, something like "get over it" and stand by that response. Radio in general is evolving at a faster pace than ever, due to increasing choices- this is our chance to get better at what we do instead of crying about why it sucks.

Those who deal with what is instead of complaining about what isn't will be the future of radio. It's OK to dream about the ideal world but we all live in the real world of radio and our energies should be poured into solutions instead of getting vapor-locked by what's not perfect about the biz.

> I read the initial post diffrently than you. I saw a
> question, and an observation about supergold. He/she also
> linked to Mike Harvey's web page. So I automatically read
> the question as a request on Mike Harveys program
> availibilty in Las Vegas. The following posts start beating
> up this poor poster about the whining about how todays
> oldies "suck". I instead saw him/her complaing about Clear
> Channel. Maybe I read his/her post wrong, but that is how I
> interpreted it.
>
> I look at this board as a common site on the internet to
> discuss oldies, wherever the source. Yes, we have beat up
> terrestial oldies to death. We all agree it "sucks" for a
> variety of reasons. We also have those on this site that
> feel that since satellite only pulls in 1-2% share, they
> should not be discussed. (but if anyone is old enough to
> remember ESPN when it started in 1978, or CNN and the
> disparinging comments that followed). But if someone posts a
> question about an oldies music source, I would like to
> discuss it further with him/her instead of beating them up.
>
> Someone else posted about a year ago about setting up some
> type of oldies listening source (I belive it was broadband)
> and listening to them in their living room. A frequent
> poster on this board (who shall go nameless but frequent
> readers will know who it is) responed about how foolish it
> would be to listen to oldies music from 56 - 63 in your
> living room on a Saturday night. I'm probably not getting
> all the facts correct, but I remenber thinking, how
> unfortunate for this frequent poster to immediately go into
> a brain dump without encouraging a discussion on Oldies.
>
> We all have our backgrounds and music biases. But this board
> is about oldies, whatever the concerns.
>
> > Has nothing to do with temperment. It's just that the
> > "oldies today suck" whine is sooooooooo old.
> >
> > NEWS FLASH: Oldies stations who've held onto the '50s too
>
> > long are dying. Those who've wised-up and evolved (as
> every
> > successful radio format has) are doing well.
> >
> > If you want '50s, XM or Sirius or CDs are fine- but this
> > "radio sucks because they've abandoned the '50s" is
> denial,
> > since there's no future (ad dollars) marketing to people
> > over 60 years of age. That's not MY OPINION- that's just
> > the way it is. I don't like it any more than many of you
> > but I'm not going to stick my head in the sand and cry
> about
> > no more doo wop on the radio.
> >
> > Radio is a business- just like any business, there's no
> > sense in staying open if customers aren't coming through
> the
> > door. Satellite or iPods are not the saviours of '50s
> > music- just an option to a few thousand nationwide who
> can't
> > live without their '50s music.
> >
> >
> > > My, my, my Oldiescat. I hope you fix that temperment of
> > > yours before your loved one joins you for Valentines
> > > tonight. Oh sorry, possibly that's the problem. Anyway,
> > lets
> > > go ahead and fix your original statement.
> > >
> > > "Most currently successful Oldies stations have moved
> away
> >
> > > from '50s and into the '70s. Deal with it "OR ORDER
> SIRIUS
> >
> > > OR XM. THE 50'S AND 60'S ARE ALIVE AND WELL ON
> > SATELLITE!!!!
> > >
> > >
> > > Happy Valantines day Oldiescat.
> > >
> >
>
 
Re: Supergold

well, then- enjoy.
>
> BTW, have you also given up commercial television (only
> watch PPV or On-Demand)? I see you're on the 'Net- how do
> you get around advertising here?


The only commercial TV I watch is Jay Leno..........and I'm gonna lose HIM in 3 years. Is there advertising on the net? It's probably there, but I never see it. So net advertisers, save your money.
 
Re: Supergold

> > [XM or Sirius has your $13/mo...they neither know nor care
>
> > what you're listening to.]
>
>
>
> They know and care what I'M listening to because they
> respond to my e-mails. This is unlike my former favorite
> commercial radio station, which doesn't even list an e-mail
> address on their website. Here's the way I see it:
> commercial radio is a Pimp, the advertiser is the John, and
> the listener is the Ho. I'd rather spend $13 a month on
> satellite than be a Ho for some commercial radio station.
>
Now lets be honest fonz. I have seen you're threads on this and the Chicago board praising WRLL and CC for sticking with their pre beatles oldies format. Last time I checked WRLL was "terrestial".
As for 13 bucks a month, well that is a cheap date but you are still paying for it.So on satellite you are just skipping the John, and getting it straight from the pimp.... hope it feels good.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom