• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Taking Bets Now - How long until Fresh is history?

As I said in another post, CBSR needs to put 92.3 out of its misery. If it were going to make any progress and be a long-term success, it would have done so by now. It's had nearly 2 years. Pretty obvious it's not getting anywhere in the ratings. It has failed. I listen to Fresh online regularly (nothing like it where I am :mad: ) and actually think it's a pretty good station with potential. 92.3 has a heritage (which Fresh does not) in the K-Rock name and is doing much worse. 102.7 isn't changing the landscape of NYC radio, necessarily, but it seems much more viable to me. JMO.

Plus....I would think WWFS has lower overhead than WXRK....does anyone know?
 
carolinaradio said:
As I said in another post, CBSR needs to put 92.3 out of its misery. If it were going to make any progress and be a long-term success, it would have done so by now. It's had nearly 2 years. Pretty obvious it's not getting anywhere in the ratings. It has failed. I listen to Fresh online regularly (nothing like it where I am :mad: ) and actually think it's a pretty good station with potential. 92.3 has a heritage (which Fresh does not) in the K-Rock name and is doing much worse. 102.7 isn't changing the landscape of NYC radio, necessarily, but it seems much more viable to me. JMO.

Plus....I would think WWFS has lower overhead than WXRK....does anyone know?

I would venture to guess that Fresh is much cheaper to run than K-Rock. No high priced morning or afternoon show, just bland, anonymous on-air personalities. And I'm sure Fresh's billing is stronger than K-Rock's as well. Plus, if you take O&A away from K-Rock (as they do pretty well in their desired demos in the morning), the ratings for the rest of the day are pitiful, probably worse than RXP's.

As you pointed out...K-Rock is a "brand name" in the NYC radio landscape and despite the heritage and the big names, it can't get out of the 2's for two years now. I'm not sure what CBS Radio is expecting at this point. Fresh has at least proven it can go up to the mid 3's and does carry a pretty high cume, and is cheap to run. It seems like a no-brainer to me.
 
What is Fresh's promotions budget???



Fresh's existing buyer and listener relationships are more congruent with those needed for a CHR than are KRock's. Sort of like Fresh was a two year stunt.
 
Brooklyndon said:
What is Fresh's promotions budget???

What is K-Rock's? Lately I've seen many more billboards advertising K-Rock, whereas there doesn't seem to be much advertising for Fresh.

Not to mention K-Rock's far more expensive on-air talent, and the fact that O&A, which are the big ratings draw for the station, may not be renewed, which will almost certainly mean that K-Rock will fall to the low 1's, if that.

Fresh's existing buyer and listener relationships are more congruent with those needed for a CHR than are KRock's. Sort of like Fresh was a two year stunt.

And they couldn't expand those relationships to a second station? In fact, advertisers might like the fact that their ads can reach their target audience on two stations.
 
neo11 said:
In fact, advertisers might like the fact that their ads can reach their target audience on two stations.

Assuming anyone at all is listening to the second station. If K-Rock and Fresh, and RXP and Pulse for that matter, have taught us anything, its that building share from the ground up by radically changing formats leads to failure in the New York City market. The stations that tend to thrive are those that build off their core.
 
Brooklyndon said:
neo11 said:
In fact, advertisers might like the fact that their ads can reach their target audience on two stations.

Assuming anyone at all is listening to the second station. If K-Rock and Fresh, and RXP and Pulse for that matter, have taught us anything, its that building share from the ground up by radically changing formats leads to failure in the New York City market. The stations that tend to thrive are those that build off their core.

You've really lost credibility with this post. Building share from the ground up? Radically changing formats? That actually does not apply for most of the examples you've given.

K-Rock: established brand name in NYC radio since the mid 80's, save for a 14 month experiment with Free FM, which targeted exactly the same demo. As long as K-Rock had Stern, it was going well, but Free FM fell on its face, and a Stern-less K-Rock that seems to think there's no other classic rock station in NYC is failing as well.

Fresh: The station is one of the top 5 in NYC in cume! Obviously, people are listening. And the station has made it as far as the mid 3's, which is hardly bad territory to be in. If they're planning on making a rash move in response to Lite FM's extraordinarily high numbers in the Christmas trends, let's not forget that Lite FM is a) an established brand name that Fresh is trying to eat away from, and b) Lite really, really benefited from the holiday music.

Perhaps it would be a wiser idea for Fresh to stay the course, tweak the music in an attempt to boost TSL (which would cement their place in the 3's if not higher), and air holiday music next year instead of CBS-FM, which did not seem to benefit much from airing the music this past holiday season.

Let's not also forget that Fresh did not build from the ground up. The station that it succeeded, Mix 102.7, targeted largely the same demos as Fresh, and Fresh has built on Mix's numbers, as Mix was hovering in the low 2's at best.

Pulse: All I'll say is that for a station with a weak signal, at the very low end of the FM dial where few listeners normally venture and which a few radios don't even tune to, no publicity, and a "niche" format to draw a cume of 600,000+ listeners (according to the last numbers anyone has seen) is no small feat. It's actually quite a big success. However, let's not let the facts get in the way of the hate so many people seem to have for this station and the fact that it even exists.

RXP: the only station that really made a radical format shift compared to the station it replaced. But that's not the reason it's failed. In fact, let's look at some radical format changes that have worked over the years:

103.5: country to rhythmic...shot up from the high 1's to #1 in NYC in one book.
100.3: from easy listening to CHR....shot up from the low 1's to #1 in NYC in one book.
93.1: from AC to Spanish AC...has been a consistently strong performer.
105.1: from various incarnations of Hot AC/modern rock/AC to hip-hop....has done well and has sometimes even surpassed the "heritage" hip-hop station, Hot 97.

To name just a few examples.

RXP is failing because the music is all over the place. You can't have Rod Stewart, Depeche Mode, the Kings of Leon, Aerosmith, AC/DC, Heart, the Beatles, Linkin Park and the Ting Tings all on the same station. It just doesn't work.

RXP really has the same problem as Fresh does, but far more magnified and pronounced: low TSL. This is evidenced by the station's cume, which would put it around #20 in the market, and the station's share, which puts it more towards #27. The low TSL is a direct result of the music being far too disjointed for most listeners to want to sit through for any substantial length of time. RXP would have a fighting chance if it would just focus its music a bit. It has actually been trending up, albeit at a very slow rate, whereas K-Rock is trending downwards, which is a bad sign for the station which has now been back on the air for almost two years (and another reason why I feel CBS should pull the plug here or make radical changes to the music).
 
Jay F said:
My guess is that they will give it two years.

If rbr.com turns out to be correct and this is the station that flips, somebody give me credit for nailing this prediction!
 
neo11 said:
You've really lost credibility with this post.  Building share from the ground up?  Radically changing formats?  That actually does not apply for most of the examples you've given.

All the success stories you mentioned are 10 years ago, and more in most cases.  Those data are irrelevant to today.

Simple, simple way to break down Fresh: the Boston Consulting Partners Growth Matrix.
Fresh is a dog:  Losing share, flat sales.  You need to grow share to make it a star, how is playing AC Country ever going to grow share past its current ceiling?

As for Free FM building of K-Rocks target that's debatable, and as for Fresh bilding on Mix, Mix had no audience to build on.
 
Brooklyndon....then what are your thoughts on WXRK? If Fresh isn't getting anywhere, I don't know see how that can be any better. The only thing I can see keeping 92 alive is O&A. I would bet it would already be dead if it weren't for them.

K-Rock 2007-present needs to go the way of the revived 2007-2008 KFRC in San Fransisco...put it out of its misery. Remember it like it was in the good 'ole days.
 
Brooklyndon said:
neo11 said:
You've really lost credibility with this post. Building share from the ground up? Radically changing formats? That actually does not apply for most of the examples you've given.

All the success stories you mentioned are 10 years ago, and more in most cases. Those data are irrelevant to today.

Simple, simple way to break down Fresh: the Boston Consulting Partners Growth Matrix.
Fresh is a dog: Losing share, flat sales. You need to grow share to make it a star, how is playing AC Country ever going to grow share past its current ceiling?

As for Free FM building of K-Rocks target that's debatable, and as for Fresh bilding on Mix, Mix had no audience to build on.

You're actually proving my point. Mix didn't have much of an audience, and from that, Fresh has become top 5 in cume. Obviously, CBS Radio has done something right to bring that many listeners to a frequency that "nobody was listening to." If the TSL isn't high enough, that means that its the music that should be tinkered with, not the whole station!

The whole intent of Free FM in NYC was to build off of K-Rock's (and Stern's) audience. They were hoping those listeners would stick around and embrace Free FM, but that didn't happen. The problem is, they haven't stuck around for a Stern-less K-Rock either.

Getting back to 102.7: Fresh isn't really losing share...it's been fluctuating up and down in the ratings between the mid 2's and the mid 3's. Lite's holiday music did eat in to their audience, it seems, so I don't think it would be fair to draw conclusions from the last couple of trends that have come out. And, as I've said before, perhaps CBS would be wise to have 102.7 go head-to-head with Lite next Christmas, instead of having CBS-FM play the Christmas music, which really didn't seem to benefit it very much.

As much as I personally find the weeks of non-stop holiday music to be annoying, it really is a winner, as Lite FM showed. However, it's a winner for the right station. CBS-FM has the label in the market of being an "old timers'" station, so most younger listeners who want to hear the holiday tunes will go to Lite FM, which also has the benefit of being established with the holiday music for the past several years now.

Fresh probably lost many of those listeners who were seeking holiday music to Lite FM and not to sister station CBS-FM, while CBS-FM saw only a very modest increase in holiday music, probably from listeners who just happened across it, or who had the station somewhere deep on their presets and "discovered" the holiday music while scanning around. Fresh, by going all holiday, will step the tide of listeners migrating over to Lite FM, and could pull listeners from other stations like PLJ, who want to hear the holiday tunes as well.

I have also heard Fresh in many businesses, but during the holiday season, most of those businesses went back to 106.7. I wouldn't be surprised if some of those businesses kept the radio on 106.7 after the holidays as well. Fresh could avoid such a loss if it goes all-Christmas next holiday season.

Now, as for the success stories...they are all from 10+ years ago because there just haven't been many radical format changes in recent years. Let's go through the list again:

92.3 K-Rock -> Free FM - > K-Rock... same target audience, bad ratings all around

101.1 CBS-FM -> Jack -> CBS-FM... Jack's 12+ numbers fell sharply and there was lots of negative publicity attached to the change, BUT, Jack was performing fairly well in its target demos and was showing growth, especially among younger listeners. CBS-FM is doing well overall, but it has the same problems it faced pre-2005: an aging audience and numbers in the higher end of the demos.

CD 101.9 -> RXP.... CD 101.9's billing was way down and the station was stagnant, though still in the mid 2's-3's...Fresh territory (but with an older audience). Problem wasn't the format flip though, it was the way RXP was, and is, executed. Like I said...Elton John, the Ting Tings, Heart, Linkin Park and Led Zeppelin do NOT, NOT, NOT work on the same station.

102.7 WNEW -> FM Talk -> CHR stunting -> Blink -> holiday music -> Mix -> Fresh.... this actually goes back about a decade to start with. However, just like with K-Rock, there was a rock station that was replaced by an FM talk station that was geared towards the same male demographic. Not really much of a radical change, but the talk station failed, and the numbers actually declined versus those of WNEW when it was rock (which weren't stellar to begin with). Then we have a radical change to CHR stunting, which lasted for a few weeks before giving way to Blink. Blink was really a pop music version of RXP. Jennifer Lopez and The Doors on the same station just doesn't fly, and accounts for its abysmal numbers, despite heavy advertising of the station, which made up for any "radical" change on that frequency. However, listeners did tune in for the holiday music, and the station showed its highest numbers (I believe a 2.2) in years. They used that as a launching pad for Mix 102.7, but the numbers stayed at that level...low 2's...despite going after the same target audience as Blink. Now, from Mix to Fresh, we don't have a very radical format change, but we see that Fresh's numbers go up as far as the mid 3's, which 102.7 had not seen in a long time, and we see that the station is top 5 in cume. That shows that Fresh has, in many ways, been successful.

105.1 AC/Hot AC/Modern Rock -> Jammin 105 -> Power 105.1... the AC/Hot AC stations were going nowhere. Jammin was a radical change from that, and worked out for a while, but the numbers began to drop. The change from Jammin to Power was somewhat radical...almost like going from oldies to CHR, but there was some overlap in the target audience. But, radical or not, Power succeeded and has often beat Hot 97. And this was less than 10 years ago.

What other radical format changes have there been in the past 10 years? Most stations have stayed put...93.1, 93.9, 94.7, 95.5, 96.3, 97.1, 97.9, 98.7, 99.5, 100.3, 103.5, 104.3, 106.7, 107.5 haven't changed much in recent years, so how could we possibly cite any more examples without going back further in time?
 
neo11 said:
101.1 CBS-FM -> Jack -> CBS-FM... Jack's 12+ numbers fell sharply and there was lots of negative publicity attached to the change, BUT, Jack was performing fairly well in its target demos and was showing growth, especially among younger listeners. CBS-FM is doing well overall, but it has the same problems it faced pre-2005: an aging audience and numbers in the higher end of the demos.

not to turn this away from the main focus of the thread, but...
a LOT of people in the "aging audience" might not necessarily agree with your statement...CBSFM has HAD to move FORWARD in order to attract a slightly younger audience - the oldtimers don't understand that...you can't have 1988 once more...

Andrea
 
andreajesus said:
neo11 said:
101.1 CBS-FM -> Jack -> CBS-FM... Jack's 12+ numbers fell sharply and there was lots of negative publicity attached to the change, BUT, Jack was performing fairly well in its target demos and was showing growth, especially among younger listeners. CBS-FM is doing well overall, but it has the same problems it faced pre-2005: an aging audience and numbers in the higher end of the demos.

not to turn this away from the main focus of the thread, but...
a LOT of people in the "aging audience" might not necessarily agree with your statement...CBSFM has HAD to move FORWARD in order to attract a slightly younger audience - the oldtimers don't understand that...you can't have 1988 once more...

Andrea

Andrea,

That's what I've been saying all along. CBS-FM needs to move forward to survive...hence the 80's music that had so many people here and on the dentist board up in arms. But that being the case, it is still a fact that CBS-FM's audience skews towards the older end of the 25-54 spectrum and that Jack had comparable numbers in the younger end.

I do think that if Jack were launched on 92.3 instead of on 101.1, it might still have been around today. I'm sure CBS Radio would take the 2.2 that Jack was getting, over K-Rock's dismal numbers.
 
I know the thinking recently has been 92.3 K-Rock flipping to Amp, but I just did a yes.com search for both K-Rock and 102.7 Fresh FM, and in the past half-hour (between 4:25-4:55 on Friday the 20th), Fresh has played the following songs:

Green Day, "Good Riddance (Time of Your Life)"
Sophie B. Hawkins, "As I Lay Me Down"
Rihanna, "S.O.S."
The Fray, "How To Save A Life"
No Doubt, "Don't Speak"

Hmmm... very interesting...

Jacko
 
Great posts neo11.

We should have a How long until K-Rock is history....not Fresh. All of the flip signs point to it, not K-Rock. I don't think it's going anywhere.
 
i agree with you...how's this - 92.3 "The New Sound of Today's Hits..." ?

Andrea
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom