Good posts all around. Early on I talked of talent having a diminished role. That specifically was about being on the air. To me, talent has a lot more to offer than a pleasing voice, a sense of humor and ability to communicate well in limited time. How talent is perceived (asset or liability) will depend on their boss as well as the company's overall core values.
Broadcasters are people and they are employees in a corporate environment. I don't believe they are any different than even someone like me who has been in banking all his life. We want to feel valued. We want to be motivated, not intimidated. And I believe those with better than average skill sets need to be challenged. Talent, most employees want to feel they are truly helping their team win and they are encouraged to think and not feel they will lose their job because of an insecure boss who may feel threatened that they are smarter. The right manager can make all the difference. From so many posts I read, I can only conclude many in the business of radio are simply not happy. That's not healthy for the person as well as the business. Empowerment is a wonderous thing.
The trend we are seeing, particularly among morning shows to cut back on a lot of the banter, I actually agree with. Perhaps that may surprise some of you. I'm also not sold on the merits of carrying news features on morning music programs. By time I drive to work, I already know a lot of what is going on. We are in an information age where everything is at our fingertips.
The morning shows should discuss current events but more in the style of an ET/Inside Edition than a network newscast. If anything, if news features need to be carried, I'm more for one that's very short and sweet.
Actually, even before all the current trends were in place, I truly believed our town had better than average local morning shows. On a lot of my trips downstate, I found a lot of stations in Central and South Florida that had way too many morning shows where 4-5 people would be talking loud over each other where 1-2 always had the last laugh and the last word. It made for very bad radio. I'm sure that has changed but why it took so long to figure out amazes me.
In the end, talent can have a lot of different roles way beyond what we hear. But I still believe it depends on whether you are considered a valued teammate or just one of those fixed expenses on a balance sheet.
Broadcasters are people and they are employees in a corporate environment. I don't believe they are any different than even someone like me who has been in banking all his life. We want to feel valued. We want to be motivated, not intimidated. And I believe those with better than average skill sets need to be challenged. Talent, most employees want to feel they are truly helping their team win and they are encouraged to think and not feel they will lose their job because of an insecure boss who may feel threatened that they are smarter. The right manager can make all the difference. From so many posts I read, I can only conclude many in the business of radio are simply not happy. That's not healthy for the person as well as the business. Empowerment is a wonderous thing.
The trend we are seeing, particularly among morning shows to cut back on a lot of the banter, I actually agree with. Perhaps that may surprise some of you. I'm also not sold on the merits of carrying news features on morning music programs. By time I drive to work, I already know a lot of what is going on. We are in an information age where everything is at our fingertips.
The morning shows should discuss current events but more in the style of an ET/Inside Edition than a network newscast. If anything, if news features need to be carried, I'm more for one that's very short and sweet.
Actually, even before all the current trends were in place, I truly believed our town had better than average local morning shows. On a lot of my trips downstate, I found a lot of stations in Central and South Florida that had way too many morning shows where 4-5 people would be talking loud over each other where 1-2 always had the last laugh and the last word. It made for very bad radio. I'm sure that has changed but why it took so long to figure out amazes me.
In the end, talent can have a lot of different roles way beyond what we hear. But I still believe it depends on whether you are considered a valued teammate or just one of those fixed expenses on a balance sheet.