Once again, I'd like to thank everyone who has participated in this informal discussion regarding Orlando radio. I thought I would give it a few more days before I commented any further, giving others an opportunity to share any other thoughts anyone else may have relating to this topic. It appears there are no more comments forthcoming, so, since I was asked to give my thoughts, I'll give them here in a basic outline. Part the outline will address specific scenarios while other parts will remain non-specific as not to give away “free” consulting services to those viewers who may happen to be Orlando radio decision makers.
Specifically, my first choice for a “makeover” is WHTQ. The station has long outlived its format, and has become stale and boring. I apologize to the program director, general manager or anyone else at WHTQ in advance.
Note to WHTQ Program Director and or General Manager: Instead of becoming defensive and justifying the status quo, take a moment to sit back, take a deep breath and seriously consider what I'm suggesting. As I have said many times, something
is what it
is. And WHTQ, agree or not, is outdated and ready for a makeover. Because you may not agree doesn't change the fact that it
is what it
is.
As once suggested, I would place WPYO on the 96.5 frequency, but I would drop the “Power” moniker for several reasons. First and foremost, I don't like Power. Like WHTQ's need for a makeover, the term Power is old and and has lost its luster. Another reason for not using Power is because of Power 96 Miami on the same frequency programming essentially the same format. Using Power 96 in Orlando will sound like a cheap “rip-off” of WPOW Miami. The moniker I would use is freash, now, and compliments the present WPYO format, and NO ONE is using it. For this reason I'm keeping it to myself, however, I will be happy to discuss a consulting arrangment for WPYO if anyone with Cox Radio who can actually make a decision would like to contact me.
NOTE TO COX RADIO: My direct number is (352) 425-3664. E-mail:
[email protected].
Additionally, with the 100kw coast-to-coast 96.5 signal, the new WPYO would have an extra competitive advantage over WXXL. WPYO already has decent numbers on the smaller 25kw signal, and I have no doubts those numbers will greatly improve with a move to the bigger stick. Also, the WXXL – WPYO ratings war will make for greatly improved CHR radio in Central Florida.
Now, this brings us to the next question. What happens to the 95.3 signal? I'm happy you asked, and I have an answer. The 95.3 frequency, under my proposal, will become WDBO-FM, re-broadcasting WDBO-AM 100%. With the new WDBO on FM, this solves night-time coverage issues currently on WDBO-AM. It also brings FM quality to the news-talk format which will attract a new breed of younger listeners to WDBO. And because of the greatly improved news-talk delivery method, sales will increase dramitically as it will on the new WPYO. As a result, the loss of WHTQ revenues will more than make up for itself with the increased sales on the new WPYO and the new WDBO-FM.
Next, being non-specific, Orlando needs a second country outlet. Right now WWKA owns the country market and has no competition whatsoever for the country demo. The new country station will have a high energy CHR delivery complete with CHR style jingles. The station will cook with live/local jocks 24/7. I won't say which FM station I'd “blow up” to make room for the new country outlet, but I have one in mind.
Next, under my proposal, I will bring a second FM talker to the market, again, much like the new country outlet, this new FM talker will be local/live 24/7. I won't be any more specific than that as not to give away anything anyone can use other than a general concept. I also won't say which FM station will become the new FM talker, but I'll bet most anything it's one none of you would have even considered.
And that, my friends, is my general overview of "The World of Mark" and the current state of Orando radio as I see it and how it can be improved. I welcome your comments, suggestions and constructive criticisms.