• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

The buzz about Pulse87

I find myself arranging my day in order to find a way to get near a radio where I can hear Pulse. I haven't felt that way about radio in quite a while. Pulse has me hooked. I kinda like how I feel like I am listening to a pirate station on 87.7, but I'm not.

Oops.... they're playing a Nickelback track. I'm sorry to hear that... but I guess all is forgiven as long as it doesn't happen too often.
 
Thanks about Glenn. I am very excited about having him around more often to help and he was the perfect choice. Glenn and Joel back programming dance music WOW
 
Erwin...do this :D

Joel Salkowitz is still running "The Original Hot 97" via Live 365.

For those that can't hear Pulse 87 online since the station isn't streaming yet and want to get an idea on how Pulse sounds, check out this stream for now!

The only difference between this and Pulse 87 are the positioners/promos. Otherwise, musically it is programmed in the same fashion!

TONY SANTIAGO
 
JerseyDude said:
Mega Media Group should form a partnership with Univision to simulcast Pulse 87 on 105.9 FM. (Pulse 106).

Why in the world would the station that has Luis Jimenez want to simulcast a niche format?
 
Maybe because 105.9 has 6 listeners and gets less ad revenue than any other FM station in New York City.

2006-$12.3 Million.....Welfare Money for a NYC Station.
 
JerseyDude said:
Maybe because 105.9 has 6 listeners and gets less ad revenue than any other FM station in New York City.

2006-$12.3 Million.....Welfare Money for a NYC Station.

2998, Luis Jiménez. Sorry, not tradable for a 1 share format.
 
JerseyDude said:
David,

Do you really think that if Pulse were on a full signal , it would only get 1 share?

You are kidding, right?

I (mostly) agree with David on this. I don't think the Zeitgeist (one of my favorite SAT words) is quite right in 2008 for Current Dance, so Pulse, even on full signal, might perform worse than, say, WPLJ.
 
MarcR said:
JerseyDude said:
David,

Do you really think that if Pulse were on a full signal , it would only get 1 share?

You are kidding, right?

I (mostly) agree with David on this. I don't think the Zeitgeist (one of my favorite SAT words) is quite right in 2008 for Current Dance, so Pulse, even on a full signal, might perform somewhat worse than, say, WPLJ (except that 'PLJ makes money).
 
JerseyDude said:
David,

Do you really think that if Pulse were on a full signal , it would only get 1 share?

You are kidding, right?

Well, maybe a 1.2.
 
The "Pulse" for me was their signal. I really wanted to hear them today as I was driving through North Jersey (New York Metro), but the only thing I was able to hear was STATIC and a faint trace of music. Not good.
 
MarcR said:
JerseyDude said:
David,

Do you really think that if Pulse were on a full signal , it would only get 1 share?

You are kidding, right?

I (mostly) agree with David on this. I don't think the Zeitgeist (one of my favorite SAT words) is quite right in 2008 for Current Dance, so Pulse, even on full signal, might perform worse than, say, WPLJ.

You could say "poltergeist" and I'll accept that versus your "zeitgeist" (meaning : spirit of the time) comment. If anything with a decline in hip-hop and certain pop sounds being saturated, now IS the time for current dance music to happen. And I can GUARANTEE (yup..you read RIGHT) at LEAST a 2 share (taking the signal issue into consideration).....which if you base "per capita" will do BETTER than 'PLJ and actually match wits at first with 'KTU. The buzz is circulating about this station and we'll continue to make it happen.
 
I'd like to think that if Pulse were on a full signal they'd pull in a 2.5.
There is a massive underserved audience in New York that has taken only to MP3 players. A young population that hasn't touched radio in years. These people don't commute by car nor work in offices. They are trendy young urbanites, artists, creative types, musicians, actors, etc, etc..that are completely without radio that fills their needs. Not to say that dance is their cup of tea but a station similar to Pulse in approach (as we call perhaps a niche formatted station) and not formatted for suburban women (as most NY. stations seem to be) might actually bring some listeners back to radio instead of the eventual demize of radio as we know it today.

That being said there is a market for dance. It works in Europe and is a matter of exposure. Madonna's last album,a pure dance album, "Confessions on a dance floor" sold over 1.7 million copies in the US. but american radio wouldn't touch it....hmmmm. ..?
Were the sales that great because it was Madonna? Of course but if it had had airplay might it not have sold more? Of course it would have.
 
Listened a little today, in between the static around buildings as I did some errands in my car, I think this station is dead on arrival because of its signal alone. I couldn't get it on a walkman, I can't get in my apt. only sometimes in my car in manhattan and if this station truely serves the young demo as the previous post says and most of them are without a car, then odds are most aren't ever going to be able to listen, because the signal sucks. I sure hope its better on the other side of the east river because in Manhattan the signal is terrible.
 
Jeffrey said:
Not to say that dance is their cup of tea but a station similar to Pulse in approach (as we call perhaps a niche formatted station) and not formatted for suburban women (as most NY. stations seem to be) might actually bring some listeners back to radio instead of the eventual demize of radio as we know it today.

Jeffrey, THANK YOU FOR NAILING THIS ON THE HEAD!

It seems as of recent that "niche" is a dirty word in the radio industry. But let's look at it this way....when you put your favorite tunes on an iPod, in effect you are creating your own "niche" of music that you enjoy. The reason why people who have flocked to satellite radio have STAYED there is because the majority of the channels have "niched" programming catered to their specific tastes; channels that cater to rock fans, heavy metal fans, classic rock fans, hip-hop fans, dance music fans, etc.

The big outcry against "Jack" wasn't just the fact that it replaced a legendary oldies station out of WCBS but that the music was just too general...like an "iPod jukebox" of sorts. To which that was a mistake right there because by being too general, you isolated people at times. And even though 'KTU may be doing well from a ratings point of view, they have become VERY general in terms of the format, sticking TOO safe. Should be VERY interesting to see what happens with 'KTU around the first book with Pulse 87 (if they make it in there). Even with the new rock station WRXP, they too are being very general. I don't see a Q-104 listener switch over to the station, listen to Zeppelin only to be followed up by the Barenaked Ladies. And who knows WHAT the heck K-Rock is trying to do.

Country may be considered "niche" to some and often enough it has been argued that such a format would NOT work in New York City. Yet, as Ray Rossi pointed on another board, country concerts that do take place here SELL OUT. If there wasn't a big enough base of country fans here, then no one would give a crap about attending concerts like Rascal Flatts, Faith Hill, Tim McGraw, Carrie Underwood....just to name a few. In that sense, I hope country fans DO get a position on the standard dial somewhere!

Niche..smiche...we have to change that thinking now! Niche is not a five letter dirty word....anymore.
 
Tony Santiago said:
And I can GUARANTEE (yup..you read RIGHT) at LEAST a 2 share (taking the signal issue into consideration).....

Since the station will not be in the radio ratings, we will never know, anyway. So this is pure speculation.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom