• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

the stream center

sfradio said:
man, where is it, I have been having withdraws, hahaha :D

It's working for me, although they say they acknowledge a problem with Cheap Channel stations. Are you outside the U.S.? CC seems to have blocked their streams from anyone outside the United States.
 
KeithE4 said:
It's working for me, although they say they acknowledge a problem with Cheap Channel stations. Are you outside the U.S.? CC seems to have blocked their streams from anyone outside the United States.

Clear Channel now requires you to load a pop-up window for most of their streams. For most people this is not a problem, except I use a PPC-6700 and have been unable to listen to CC streams since the change. Whenever I try to load the raw url of the stream into WIndows Media Player, I get a "not authrorized" error.

I hope this is not a trend the other major broadcasters will follow, such as Citadel, CBS & Cox.
 
The Dude said:
Yes i know it sucks.........

Why are they trying to force you to listen in thier crap?

My guess is because they want you to only access their stream via their web page. That way you're forced to see the ads. Their embedded player also can display ads in some cases.

CBS is also doing this on some of their stations, notably WFAN and WCBS.
 
Here's my problem.
I used WMP because it was much more accessible with my screenreading software. The Popup players are set to a certain volume whereas I could adjust Media Player without affecting my speech volume. So, any ways to get around it?
 
Unfortunetly, Clear Channel is now streaming their stations the way Major League Baseball streams their live games (both use Akamai.com as their streaming provider); the reflector number assigned to each station don't change, but the authorization key to listen to a particular stream changes every 24 hours. So by the time you've sniffed everything out to save a station in your WMP library, the file is already dead :(
Sucks, but there it is.
 
RadioFanBoy said:
Unfortunetly, Clear Channel is now streaming their stations the way Major League Baseball streams their live games (both use Akamai.com as their streaming provider); the reflector number assigned to each station don't change, but the authorization key to listen to a particular stream changes every 24 hours. So by the time you've sniffed everything out to save a station in your WMP library, the file is already dead :(
Sucks, but there it is.

Any broadcaster who operates this way is behaving like a fool. You are telling many of your potential listeners to go somewhere else.
 
Bottom line is they wanna put SPAM IN YOUR FACE!!!!

All ya gotta do is close the tab though and go on surfing like you were using your Stand alone player :)
 
I have no problem with the advertising. I mean, I can't see it, so I really don't care. My main issue is that some stations stream so loudly that my JAWS software cannot be heard thus I cannot surf the net. Also, streaming is a new revenue feature, and oh yeah it's free. No such thing as a free lunch guys.
 
The advertising isn't spam. Spam is something you get unsolicited. The advertising in this case is opt-in. You opt-in by listening to the stream. If you don't want advertising then don't listen to the stream. Advertising is your payment for the service because advertising funds the stream. If you aren't willing to do that then don't "Listen Now".

There seems to be a lack of understanding of the value and cost of streaming. Unlike broadcast radio, where having 1,000 listeners costs no more than having 1 listener, in the streaming world 1000 listeners is 1000 times more expensive. It's DIRECTLY proportional.

The other option is subscription. Unfortunately, most subscription services have failed miserably as a business model. The only ones in the public media sector I can think of that 'may' be successful are Rush Limbaugh and other national personalities. It would be very difficult to convince many of a station's listeners to pay for what they have been taught is free.

Like it or not, streaming for terrestrial radio stations is a business not a hobby.
 
My question is, will WSIX continue to simulcast on XM Channel 161 and also stream online if the RIAA and
SoundExchange get their way?
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom