Radio Re-evaluation
> Come to think of it, which music station probably needs a
> re-evaluation of its music mix the most? Eliminate the
> specialized stations that superserve clearly identifiable
> core audiences, like WYRK, WBLK, WNED-FM and WHTT in Buffalo
> or WBEE, WXXI-FM and WDKX in Rochester...those stations
> aren't going to change and probably shouldn't, so they're
> not going to be rethinking essential aspects of their
> strategy. Who in each market might need to undertake such an
> exercise? And which way should they go?
>
As to the need for music testing, could it be (one of) those stations that "superserve clearly identifiable core audiences?"
Perhaps WYRK wants to make certain it's music hasn't strayed too far for the core? Maybe WHTT wants to find out if its classic hits version of oldies is in sync with the proper demographic? What if 97 Rock wants to make sure its now deeper music base is on target for the upcoming spring book? Could it be that WBLK also wants to make sure its music mix is wider based? Wouldn't it make sense for any of these stations to be testing its music?
As to WLKK, I don't listen to it nearly as much as I once did, yet it's still on one of my car radio buttons. I seem to have unconsciously tired of it. Curiously, I hadn't noticed until I read this thread. I guess this indicates how much even we "radio fans" overlook (gradual) changes in our listening habits and the subtle changes that sometimes occur until they're pointed out.
In the last week, the most listened to stations while on the road have been WBFO, WTSS, WHTT, 97 Rock, Q107, WNED-AM, WWKB and WGR. I've also listened to WHLD, but find that its programming is uninspiring. Combined with its spotty signal, it's not made much of an impact on my personal listening habits.
Best regards,
Janos Surlikevich