Re: The Return of Actual (Ind.) Stations in US Markets
> > The million dollar question now is... What happenes to the
>
> > WB 100+ group.
>
> I have a feeling that in a lot of markets, we're going to
> see the return of the designator (Ind.) as the station
> losing affiliation with either WB or UPN resumes fully
> independent status.
>
> Now we can get Matlock or Good Times at 9:30pm again.

>
> In markets like Rochester, NY we have a low power station
> serving as the UPN affiliate and paying their way onto TW's
> cable system and a TW-operated "fake" WB16 channel that
> serves as the local "WB affiliate."
>
> Call me corporatist, but I have a feeling low power WBGT
> (UPN) is about to be dealt out of the game, and I suspect
> that is going to happen in a lot of markets.
>
> In markets with a full power UPN or WB affiliate they'll
> probably adopt the new CW network. In markets with both
> affiliates operating at full power (or nearby from a rimshot
> market), at least one of them is probably going to resume
> independent status, unless they want to go Spanish,
> religious, or home shopping.
>
I think my situation is going to be the same here in Savannah, Georgia, Phillip.
We have via our cable provider Comcast WBVH WB 15 (Channel 15 on cable), a part of The WB 100+. We also have WGSA/UPN 34 (cable channel 13), a LP UPN affiliate. It started out as WUBI, an affiliate of The WB until early 1997. Now with the creation of The CW, I have little doubt that WGSA will become an independent station. I just hope that they don't recant their UPN affiliation before September, as I need my "Veronica Mars" fix. So yeah, I think The WB 100+ will just become The CW 100+.
As far as the future, I have DIRECTV and as such, will receive The CW via Tribune's WBZL out of Miami come September. <P ID="edit"><FONT class="small">
Edited by FilmCritic3000 on 01/25/06 06:49 AM.</FONT></P>