> Maybe you failed to notice the quotes around what Mike
> Malloy said. Quotation marks -- in case you skipped English
> class
This from a guy who spells Majestic, as he does...
-- indicate EXACTLY what was said. How about a little
> wager of a couple hundred bucks. I'll be happy to play you
> the tape.
You taped it? Jeez, save some typing, and just admit, your only posts on this board, are to hate on 680. So far, that's been your purpose. Take the 200 bucks you wish to wager, (I don't doubt your right, BTW) and buy an FM receiver, or something. Hating on Liberal talk, that was so "done", back in July on this board.
> Hmmm ... how much of that 0.0 falls into 25-54?
So already, the same as it predecessor, sadly. Look at the last book Easy 680 had, and break it down to adults 25-54, and there's your 0.0. Hence the flip.
> 680 flipped to "Progressive Talk" on January 28. That gave
> the station over two months before the spring book started.
> The station pulled a meager half share during its honeymoon
> book. Now even that tiny audience has gone bye bye. Why
> bother to point out that it is a 12+ trend. What part of 0.0
> was 25-54?
As much as you have so diligently been paying attention to the station, that number is not accurate. I think we need to get YOU a diary! I have conceded the station is not doing well, but it's was not a factor as EASY 680 either. Not in demos that count. You are currently correct, in that Adults 25-54 is bad now. ( A fact you obviously love.) So enjoy that while it lasts, the beauty of 0.0 in a book that doesn't count, is there is no where to go but up.
>
> You're right. It's so entertaining that ... nobody listens!
Not true, you listen, and you have tape and 200 bucks to prove it!
> Oh, sure. Now it's diary placement. Maybe they should hand
> out diaries at Al Franken's next breakfast.
You don't think it's a factor? Have you been anywhere near Midtown. Been to Cooper Young? Like it or not, the station is known there. Those non existent White liberals are there in droves, and it is indeed, a factor.
> Geez, speak of Radio 101 ...
>
> When did the Limbaugh show enjoy record success? During
> eight years of Bill Clinton.
Oh, so it's floundering now? Rush was successful pre Clinton too. I just wonder how much Oxycotin played in his success? I wonder if EIB traced it down to rating points per pill?
>
> Entertaining and compelling talk radio will succeed
> regardless of who is in office.
On that, we agree. Just because conservatives don't find it entertaining, doesn't mean others won't. I concede again, that WWTQ has a lot of ground to catch up on, to succeed. That being said, pull up numbers on KPOJ. The model of what AAR can do, when it reaches it's audience. Believe it or not, this (Portland)once was a strong market for Rush, and his imitators, for years. Probably still is. (just not as good as it used to be.)
>
> Sabre-rattling from the lunatic fringe will fail regardless
> of who is in office.
Do me a favor, tell that to Michael Savage, and Sean Hannity, will you? Sabre Rattling obviously works for them. In Hannity's case, a blatant disregard for the truth, is a selling point as well.
We can continue this, if you'd like, Mr. Majestic, however, I have conceded the parts you care about. So enjoy, and toast the lack of success coming from WWTQ in this, the all important Summer Trend. You predicting it's total downfall, and failure, if that proves to be true, great. After that, we can celebrate the fact, that even drunk drivers make it home safely some of the time, too. CFKane
>