• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Trio goes dark!

SomeRadioGuy said:
Their TV station newscasts look decent, seems like thats where all the money went, LOL. THey have a 15KW LP-DTV licensed to Perry.. the news is done in Farmington, MO by Fred Docknis.. and the weather is done there as well. The only local Tv staff in Perry is the sports guy, who I think is/was the Operations manager there.

Once upon a time, the LPTV and radio cluster was doing pretty well. The LPTV is on the local cable system and it has reasonably good coverage of the county, too. They were well plugged into the little community and had locally produced news, originating from the studios there. Pretty amazing for such a small town. At some point, they were billing better than $10k/mo, however, there was some personal strife at the cluster a couple of years ago. Without going into the details, Dockins fired almost everyone, and tried to sell the stations, but there were no buyers.
 
The background provided by Kmagrille adds even more fuel to my fiery question suggested by my earlier post. How can an IRS-beleaguered business be helped by a rules-ignoring, license-heavy operator (TV AND radio) that has a proven track record of eeking out a meager living at best?

Several years back, I was forced into a broadcast "education" by my financial firm employer that maintained an on-going due diligence effort, keeping a constant eye on a rather large loan they had approved for radio stations. The loan committee members got swept up into excitement they remembered about radio stations, big contests (cars and money giveaways), big voices, morning shows with multiple sidekick characters, concerts, tee-shirts, record/CD giveaways, elaborate vehicles, remote broadcasts, etc. etc. etc.

Once approved and into the loan portfolio, I had the displeasure of watching the new buyers, more bankers than radio people, attempt to show the broacasters who'd sold it how THEY knew nothing about business. For a while, profits reported were pretty good, considering the debt payments, but that feat was accomplished almost exclusively by cost-cutting. It wasn't too long before things slipped and every call to check on things was met with more ideas for saving money. They found "consultants", promised format changes and attempted to pass those off as a "magic dust" that would automatically create more revenue, yet I don't recall that actually ever happening. They built websites, bartered programming off the satellite, and attempted to raise rates on a diminishing list of advertisers. Fortunately for my bank, these "new broadcasters" found another group to swallow their folly and the loan was satisfied.

I remember afterwards, with another, yet smaller "radio opportunity" for the bank explaining to the new loan committee that the license cannot be considered collateral, yet it represents more than 75% of the value. End of discussion that day.

Now, as a I take "continuing education" only as an observer, I see things have only gotten worse. Just as with the housing bubble, profits can no longer be realized by selling to someone with more money seeking the glamour of your industry. Somebody had better find those men and women that knew how to make a buck because they were IN the business...not sitting on an egg waiting for the bigger deal to hatch.

(If enough seem interested in my rant, I'll post again soon in the Gainesville thread. I had an opportunity a couple of weeks ago to listen to a young person on the inside. I warn you, it's pretty gloomy.)

Back to the TRIO...DARK. The background I've seen on here tells me that a few months...a couple of quarters...or even a year from now, they'll be in even worse shape. I hope I'm wrong...for them, and for the people that used to enjoy listening to radio.
 
radio.observer said:
(If enough seem interested in my rant, I'll post again soon in the Gainesville thread. I had an opportunity a couple of weeks ago to listen to a young person on the inside. I warn you, it's pretty gloomy.)

Please post!
 
radio.observer said:
... How can an IRS-beleaguered business be helped by a rules-ignoring, license-heavy operator (TV AND radio) that has a proven track record of eeking out a meager living at best?

I'm not sure I'd characterize Dockins as being barely sucessful. I'd say that crunching out between $10k and $20k/mo in a tiny market like Perry with all the competition is a good accomplishment. The reasons for the trumoil, according to my second hand understanding, were primarily personal, not business related.

Dockins may not always follow the FCC rules, but I doubt he has any serious violations, either. In any case, there's almost nothing to lose from the LMA. If Dockins suceeds, the IRS gets paid and the trio gains some of its lost value back. Most lilely, Dockins is doing a rent-to-own deal. If Dockins fails, the LMA proceeds from Dockins to Bolton still go towards the IRS debt and the stations stay on the air with the IRS blessings. From Bolton's perspective, it's as good as it gets.
 
radio.observer said:
Please correct if I'm wrong, but isn't this the same operator referred to in the post "WPRY Off-The-Air"? He's allegedly operating a translator while the AM being translated is off, and now he's in control of someone else's license. Just what these people need--a flagrant rules violator to fix their problems. Wish I could hear that signal.

If there is a technical problem with WPRY, the translator issue can be easily "fixed" by simply re-broadcasting the HD2 signal of Dockins WFDZ-FM; hence, legally keeping the second Perry FM signal on the air without the AM.
 
901Rocks said:
WNFK and WGRO are still silent. Only WQLC has been powered back up so far.

Dockins is most likely working on getting WQLC "up and running" first before he allocates additional financial resources to doing the same with WGRO and WNFK. Interestingly, with WNFK, Dockins will control two of the three local Perry FM signals which will give him a much more competitive advantage in that market.
 
Radio observer - wow! I can't tell you how many similar situations that I have seen over the last few decades. That "discussion" is pretty precise! You're seeing the real side of radio business right there, folks. It ain't flashy or pretty is it?
 
jmtillery said:
901Rocks said:
WNFK and WGRO are still silent. Only WQLC has been powered back up so far.

Dockins is most likely working on getting WQLC "up and running" first before he allocates additional financial resources to doing the same with WGRO and WNFK. Interestingly, with WNFK, Dockins will control two of the three local Perry FM signals which will give him a much more competitive advantage in that market.
I imagine there'll be a new, different format on 92.1, since he also has Froggy 93.5 playing country music. I wish "The Zone" was on a bigger signal than the translator at 95.3. I like that station. (92-1 The Zone......hint, hint ;D )
 
901Rocks said:
With WQLC now back, I wonder what Newman is going to do with WDSR? A flip back to oldies?

I wouldn't bet on it. Just going back on the air isn't going to restore the confidence of the advertisers by itself. Newman already captured a lot of the revenue and he hired some of the talent that was fired from WQLC. Although WDSR and 97.1 lack the big signal of WQLC, they have the businesses and population of Lake City well covered. I'd expect quite a battle for that format. WQLC may have the upper hand due to coverage, but Newman's well plugged into the market and can offer combined media buys that WQLC cannot.
 
Kmagrill said:
901Rocks said:
With WQLC now back, I wonder what Newman is going to do with WDSR? A flip back to oldies?

I wouldn't bet on it. Just going back on the air isn't going to restore the confidence of the advertisers by itself. Newman already captured a lot of the revenue and he hired some of the talent that was fired from WQLC. Although WDSR and 97.1 lack the big signal of WQLC, they have the businesses and population of Lake City well covered. I'd expect quite a battle for that format. WQLC may have the upper hand due to coverage, but Newman's well plugged into the market and can offer combined media buys that WQLC cannot.

You nailed it right in the head. I wouldn't be surprised if the Country format became strong enough that he send the news talk format to the AM/FM translator and put the Falcon at 96.5 just to give WQLC a run for their money. Just my two cents but the new 95.5 translator should be just as effective as a Class A FM if they stay this course for the long haul.

The press releases WQLC has sent out in this whole mess has probably sent the wrong message to advertisers and are likely not going to venture back anytime soon until they see the station is serious about being back in the air and won't jump ship again.
 
JAWilson said:
The press releases WQLC has sent out in this whole mess has probably sent the wrong message to advertisers and are likely not going to venture back anytime soon until they see the station is serious about being back in the air and won't jump ship again.

Equally bad is when the IRS contacts the advertisers and tells them to mail their checks to the IRS. Now, the LMA partner has to carry a letter from the IRS to every advertiser explaining that it's "OK" not to send the money to the IRS after all. I'd rather not advertise than to get mixed up in some IRS dispute that might bite me later. I'll bet you couldn't pay some advertisers to be on WQLC right now. I understand Newman's out doing live remotes on WDSR and is actively promoting the new format on the other stations as well. With an effective competitor in Lake City, it could be a year or more before WQLC gets back to 50% of what it had.

It's going to be a long, slow recovery for WQLC, I suspect.
 
Kmagrill said:
It's going to be a long, slow recovery for WQLC, I suspect.

I'm sure you're correct, but to hear them on the air with better audio quality, some ads & most of the same airstaff, you get the impression that they're recovering just fine so far.

I still think Newman will have to rethink his plan. Possibly including 96.5 if he still wants this Falcon thing to work.
There's been no more mention of the Falcon on WNFB since WQLC returned.

This area has more than enough country outlets.... slices of that pie are getting pretty thin.
 
[/quote]

but the new 95.5 translator should be just as effective as a Class A FM if they stay this course for the long haul.

[/quote]

Am I missing something? 95.5 as effective as a Class A? 10 watts at 33 feet is not what I would consider as effective as a Class A. 10 watts at 500 feet maybe...
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom