• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Trump to PBS and NPR: I’m cutting you off…

He doesn't have the power to do that. The courts have already ruled on similar funding cuts he's made. The money is appropriated, and that's it.


He obviously ran out of patience with congress, because he told them to shut it down, and they didn't. He then tried to fire three people at CPB, and was immediately sued. So we will wake up Friday morning, and he'll be sued again.

CPB was created specifically to prevent this from happening. He has no authority over CPB and can't tell them what to do. They won't fold as easily as USAGM.
 

Also the CEO of PBS has appeared on PBS Newshour to respond to the recent drama between the White House and CPB this week and how the situation affects their local affiliates.



Likewise the CEO of NPR appeared on All Things Considered to respond to a similar drama between them, CPB and Congress for the same stuff. First of all the current CPB funding approved by congress does not end until 2027 after the midterm elections. Whatever Trump and Marjorie Taylor Greene had in mind violates the current budget for CPB. Also the states dispute their decision.
 
Here's a little secret; Trump does this when he's losing in the polls with his voters. He suddenly barks out all these tough guy proclamations, just to show 'em he's big boss man. Or whatever this week.

BigA is right. Trump is just puffing himself up again. If he were anyone else, his threats would have been responded with "You will? My, aren't you just adorable! SAAAY! Who wants their happy pills and applesauce?......."
 
Also you have to guess what does the Trump Administration not want the rest of the country to know about? We have to dig the wire services from Tariffs to the Putin Administration to get a partial clue. Also we have to figure out which Episodes of PBS Frontline and PBS News hour Trump wants censored for some reason in the same way Trump went after Paramount CBS News and Disney's ABC News for the same reasons. OK the licenses WGBH-TV, WNET-TV, WETA-TV, WHYY-TV, KQED-TV has to be on the list of PBS affiliates that the FCC will go after as part of the Defund PBS and NPR agenda.



 
Last edited:
As expected, CPB has responded to the president's order:


“CPB is not a federal executive agency subject to the President’s authority. Congress directly authorized and funded CPB to be a private nonprofit corporation wholly independent of the federal government.

“In creating CPB, Congress expressly forbade ‘any department, agency, officer, or employee of the United States to exercise any direction, supervision, or control over educational television or radio broadcasting, or over [CPB] or any of its grantees or contractors…’ 47 U.S.C. § 398(c).”
 
BigA is right. Trump is just puffing himself up again. If he were anyone else, his threats would have been responded with "You will? My, aren't you just adorable! SAAAY! Who wants their happy pills and applesauce?......."

This EO was issued after business hours. If it was anyone else, we'd think it was a drunk dial. He had too much wine at dinner, and issued a proclamation. Keep in mind this is the person who oversees our military and nuclear weapons. If he has indigestion, he could set off a world war.
 
NPR's CEO has issued a statement regarding this latest EO:


Last night the President released an Executive Order seeking to cease all federal funding to NPR and PBS. We will vigorously defend our right to provide essential news, information and life-saving services to the American public. We will challenge this Executive Order using all means available.

The President's order is an affront to the First Amendment rights of NPR and locally owned and operated stations throughout America to produce and air programming that meets the needs of their communities. It is also an affront to the First Amendment rights of station listeners and donors who support independent news and information.

Here is the response from PBS:

 



Local affiliates of NPR and PBS has said something similar via reposting of articles from PBS News Hour and NPR News. Or the GM modified statements the CEO's of NPR and PBS made with local impacts and how it affects journalism in city halls and state capital news coverage as seen here.


 
This EO was issued after business hours. If it was anyone else, we'd think it was a drunk dial. He had too much wine at dinner, and issued a proclamation. Keep in mind this is the person who oversees our military and nuclear weapons. If he has indigestion, he could set off a world war.
Well allegedly, he doesn't drink. And his gut can process daily McDonald's, so indigestion is impossible.

The bottom line is he wrote the damn thing, likely during business hours when he could have been doing something besides complaining about things he really has no concept of at all. (Such as....anything?)
 

Here is more but this plan to eliminate CPB funding in 2026 conflicts with the current funding that ends in 2027.
Is there a legal loophole (or at least one that will pass the sniff test with the stacked courts) that would allow Trump or a congressional majority to rescind the funding already allocated?
 
Well allegedly, he doesn't drink. And his gut can process daily McDonald's, so indigestion is impossible.

The bottom line is he wrote the damn thing, likely during business hours when he could have been doing something besides complaining about things he really has no concept of at all. (Such as....anything?)
Did he write it or just sign it?
 
Is there a legal loophole (or at least one that will pass the sniff test with the stacked courts) that would allow Trump or a congressional majority to rescind the funding already allocated?

That's already been proposed. They call it a "clawback." It can only be done by congress. However it can't be done for ideological reasons.


To do this, they will have to prove fraud, misconduct, or some kind of criminal activity was done with the money. Not free speech.

 
It's called impoundment, which was supposedly outlawed in 1974, but an integral part of Project 2025.

That hasn't been done yet with CPB. They attempted to do it with FEMA funds for CPB, but got sued and the money was delivered.

The white house is proposing a claw back of funds already distributed. That's a different thing, and it's explained above.

What this thread is about is the EO directing CPB to stop giving appropriated funds to NPR and PBS for ideological reasons. CPB has until June to comply. No explanation about what happens if CPB doesn't comply. Based on what we've seen at the Peace Institute, it's not going to be pretty.

 
That's already been proposed. They call it a "clawback." It can only be done by congress. However it can't be done for ideological reasons.


To do this, they will have to prove fraud, misconduct, or some kind of criminal activity was done with the money. Not free speech.

First of all whatever the Trump administration is doing with his rants on CPB does not line up with reality. Also there's no proof that CPB committed fraud in this case. In reality CPB has conducted a financial audit on California State University, Sacramento the owners of Sacramento's NPR affiliate Capital Public Radio/CapRadio. In other words Congress and the Trump Administration cannot do a clawback on CPB. In this case CapRadio has to return $200k in funds back to the Corporation of Public Broadcasting because they had a reason to believe that CapRadio previous GM was misusing their funds. So the Trump administration and certain members of congress are wrong on their assessment of CPB.




The CPB audit found CapRadio significantly overreported its revenue minus any federal funding it received to the CPB. These overruns totaled $5,800,598 across the 2021, 2022 and 2023 fiscal years.

The CPB awarded the station $125,818 in grants in response to the station’s self-reported income. CPB is now asking CapRadio to repay the organization nearly $200,000 for the grants it awarded based on the incorrect information given.

The report also determined that CapRadio:

  • Failed to maintain sufficient accounting records.
  • Did not provide required advance notice of public meetings or post required financial records on its website.
  • Did not comply with general provisions and eligibility criteria requirements related to grants.
  • “Commingled” its grant revenues and expenses with other stations it operates.
  • Did not comply with CPB financial reporting guidelines.
Auditors wrote that a test of CapRadio’s 2024 fiscal year transactions showed adequate documentation and support, in addition to proper adherence to guidelines. The report attributes these results to Sac State’s takeover of CapRadio’s accounting practices in October 2023.
 


PBS issues another statement on how important Public Television is to their audience. In this case they listed how their local affilaites do important documentaries in the most notable Red States like Wyoming, Texas, Arkansas and Iowa. Also in another case they mentioned

PBS Member Stations are often the only independent, locally owned media in a community and they are responsible for creating content in communities that often get overlooked.
  • In Wyoming, that means a special on how miners grapple with their mental health.
  • In Iowa, it’s a documentary on the development of the tractorin the 20th century.
  • In Arkansas, it’s a look at the “Back Road Barns of Arkansas.
  • During major events such as the solar eclipse, PBS in Texas (KLRN) hosted a viewing party in partnership with community groups, the local community college, and NASA. More than 6,500 people showed up, including nearly 2,000 students.

In another case they mentioned how Right Wing Pundits appeared on PBS shows when it came to politics. Yes some of it is because they appeared on the local shows as in statewide debates and the local equivalent of PBS Newshour in those cases.

PBS is not for one political side or the other. It’s for everyone. 65% of Americans who voted for the current Administration say PBS is either underfunded or adequately funded. That’s because in reality, PBS and our member stations have programming that caters to viewers of all backgrounds and political affiliations across the nation.
For example, FIRING LINE with Margaret Hoover creates a forum for people with a wide range of views to respectfully share ideas.In recent years this has included Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, political pundit Bill O’Reilly, Senator Joni Ernst, Governor Chris Sununu, Secretary for the Interior Doug Burgum, Ohio gubernatorial candidate Vivek Ramaswamy, Senator Tim Scott, and many more.
 

Here is an update on how the State of North Dakota responds to funding public media in the state.

North Dakota lawmakers set state funding for public broadcasting at $400,000 early Saturday, providing money for tower improvements after threatening to cut off Prairie Public funding completely earlier in the session.

Gov. Kelly Armstrong had proposed $2.9 million in his preliminary budget for the 2025-27 biennium, with $1.7 million in one-time funding to assist with transmitter maintenance and replacement.

A bill mandating that Prairie Public funding be eliminated advanced through the House but was defeated in the Senate.
 


Back
Top Bottom