Trump White House Seeks to Cease Federal Funding to PBS, NPR With New Executive Order
The Trump White House has ordered that all federal funding of PBS and NPR be blocked under the argument they are "biased."
“CPB is not a federal executive agency subject to the President’s authority. Congress directly authorized and funded CPB to be a private nonprofit corporation wholly independent of the federal government.
“In creating CPB, Congress expressly forbade ‘any department, agency, officer, or employee of the United States to exercise any direction, supervision, or control over educational television or radio broadcasting, or over [CPB] or any of its grantees or contractors…’ 47 U.S.C. § 398(c).”
BigA is right. Trump is just puffing himself up again. If he were anyone else, his threats would have been responded with "You will? My, aren't you just adorable! SAAAY! Who wants their happy pills and applesauce?......."
Last night the President released an Executive Order seeking to cease all federal funding to NPR and PBS. We will vigorously defend our right to provide essential news, information and life-saving services to the American public. We will challenge this Executive Order using all means available.
The President's order is an affront to the First Amendment rights of NPR and locally owned and operated stations throughout America to produce and air programming that meets the needs of their communities. It is also an affront to the First Amendment rights of station listeners and donors who support independent news and information.
Well allegedly, he doesn't drink. And his gut can process daily McDonald's, so indigestion is impossible.This EO was issued after business hours. If it was anyone else, we'd think it was a drunk dial. He had too much wine at dinner, and issued a proclamation. Keep in mind this is the person who oversees our military and nuclear weapons. If he has indigestion, he could set off a world war.
Is there a legal loophole (or at least one that will pass the sniff test with the stacked courts) that would allow Trump or a congressional majority to rescind the funding already allocated?![]()
White House proposes eliminating CPB’s funding in FY26 budget plan
“Nearly all federal funding for public media appears to be eliminated” from Trump’s discretionary budget request, says CPB Chair Ruby Calvert.current.org
Here is more but this plan to eliminate CPB funding in 2026 conflicts with the current funding that ends in 2027.
Did he write it or just sign it?Well allegedly, he doesn't drink. And his gut can process daily McDonald's, so indigestion is impossible.
The bottom line is he wrote the damn thing, likely during business hours when he could have been doing something besides complaining about things he really has no concept of at all. (Such as....anything?)
It's called impoundment, which was supposedly outlawed in 1974, but an integral part of Project 2025. What you need to know about impoundment, and how Trump vows to use itIs there a legal loophole (or at least one that will pass the sniff test with the stacked courts) that would allow Trump or a congressional majority to rescind the funding already allocated?
Is there a legal loophole (or at least one that will pass the sniff test with the stacked courts) that would allow Trump or a congressional majority to rescind the funding already allocated?
www.tvtechnology.com
It's called impoundment, which was supposedly outlawed in 1974, but an integral part of Project 2025.
First of all whatever the Trump administration is doing with his rants on CPB does not line up with reality. Also there's no proof that CPB committed fraud in this case. In reality CPB has conducted a financial audit on California State University, Sacramento the owners of Sacramento's NPR affiliate Capital Public Radio/CapRadio. In other words Congress and the Trump Administration cannot do a clawback on CPB. In this case CapRadio has to return $200k in funds back to the Corporation of Public Broadcasting because they had a reason to believe that CapRadio previous GM was misusing their funds. So the Trump administration and certain members of congress are wrong on their assessment of CPB.That's already been proposed. They call it a "clawback." It can only be done by congress. However it can't be done for ideological reasons.
![]()
Trump Administration to Ask Congress for $1.1 Billion in Funding Cuts to CPB
It is considering a rescission package that would ask Congress to claw back previously approved spending for public mediawww.tvtechnology.com
To do this, they will have to prove fraud, misconduct, or some kind of criminal activity was done with the money. Not free speech.
![]()
Clawback: Definition, How It Works, and Financial Examples
Discover how clawbacks let employers reclaim funds and examine their role in finance, government, and Medicaid, plus explore key examples and defenses.www.investopedia.com
The CPB audit found CapRadio significantly overreported its revenue minus any federal funding it received to the CPB. These overruns totaled $5,800,598 across the 2021, 2022 and 2023 fiscal years.
The CPB awarded the station $125,818 in grants in response to the station’s self-reported income. CPB is now asking CapRadio to repay the organization nearly $200,000 for the grants it awarded based on the incorrect information given.
The report also determined that CapRadio:
Auditors wrote that a test of CapRadio’s 2024 fiscal year transactions showed adequate documentation and support, in addition to proper adherence to guidelines. The report attributes these results to Sac State’s takeover of CapRadio’s accounting practices in October 2023.
- Failed to maintain sufficient accounting records.
- Did not provide required advance notice of public meetings or post required financial records on its website.
- Did not comply with general provisions and eligibility criteria requirements related to grants.
- “Commingled” its grant revenues and expenses with other stations it operates.
- Did not comply with CPB financial reporting guidelines.
PBS Member Stations are often the only independent, locally owned media in a community and they are responsible for creating content in communities that often get overlooked.
- In Wyoming, that means a special on how miners grapple with their mental health.
- In Iowa, it’s a documentary on the development of the tractorin the 20th century.
- In Arkansas, it’s a look at the “Back Road Barns of Arkansas.”
- During major events such as the solar eclipse, PBS in Texas (KLRN) hosted a viewing party in partnership with community groups, the local community college, and NASA. More than 6,500 people showed up, including nearly 2,000 students.
PBS is not for one political side or the other. It’s for everyone. 65% of Americans who voted for the current Administration say PBS is either underfunded or adequately funded. That’s because in reality, PBS and our member stations have programming that caters to viewers of all backgrounds and political affiliations across the nation.
For example, FIRING LINE with Margaret Hoover creates a forum for people with a wide range of views to respectfully share ideas.In recent years this has included Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, political pundit Bill O’Reilly, Senator Joni Ernst, Governor Chris Sununu, Secretary for the Interior Doug Burgum, Ohio gubernatorial candidate Vivek Ramaswamy, Senator Tim Scott, and many more.
Well, I don't exactly remember any Congressional legislation over it.Did he write it or just sign it?
North Dakota lawmakers set state funding for public broadcasting at $400,000 early Saturday, providing money for tower improvements after threatening to cut off Prairie Public funding completely earlier in the session.
Gov. Kelly Armstrong had proposed $2.9 million in his preliminary budget for the 2025-27 biennium, with $1.7 million in one-time funding to assist with transmitter maintenance and replacement.
A bill mandating that Prairie Public funding be eliminated advanced through the House but was defeated in the Senate.