• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

UHF Network Affil Start-Ups in Late 1960s/Early 1970s

Since I don't have much time these days to do retros, I thought I'd send a Christmas present of sorts to all the discussion board regulars in this way:

With the recent post about ABC primary affils in two-station markets, I bought up the case of a UHF station in Augusta, Georgia that was started on Christmas Eve 1968 (that's the connection), WATU, channel 26, which is now WAGT, digital 30, PSIP 26, an ostensibly NBC affil at the time of first sign-on. However, the original NBC affil, WJBF, by this time with ABC primarily, and the CBS station, WRDW, both VHFs and having been on air for over a decade, kept the new station at bay by persuading NBC that "this little dinky station wasn't going to make it" and thus continuing to carry the Peacock's top-rated shows, as had been the case for several years, since WJBF's move toward the Alphabet as primary.

Sure as shooting, WATU got the scraps and had to make do with those and whatever syndie offerings (cheap or free ones at that, I would presume) it could muster. And even more certainly, it shouldn't surprise anyone that most advertisers, knowing that many residents of the "Georgia-Lina" region didn't have UHF receivers and that those who did weren't watching after the novelty had worn off, shied away from the new channel. Add that on top of high start-up costs, with color everything (no station could even give away its old B&W equipment by this point), a higher power bill for a UHF transmitter and tower, and the beginnings of a recession in 1969-70, and it became clear that the owners had gotten in far over their heads.

By 1970, they had no choice but to pull the plug, returning Augusta to a two-station market. However, unlike almost all others, they didn't just walk away, as was typical with failures of this kind. They apparently strove to pay off debts and make arrangements to bring the station back on a firmer financial footing. By early 1974, they were ready to try again, and after a slow re-start and obviously intentional cultivation of sales contacts this time around (as opposed to the attitude that "they'll come to our doors knocking"), WATU picked up steam, and according to our friend bpatrick, finally got 30 Rock to ink an exclusive deal around 1977, putting an end to one of the last remaining cherry-picking arrangements in the country. Today, with cable penetration nearly universal and now with digital and old audience loyalties now shattered into pieces, all of that is, to use the old cliche, ancient history.

We have dealt with the standard, time-worn explanations of why UHFs had so much trouble before the crop of indies in the late 1970s and early 1980s: hardened viewer preferences for one or more VHFs, the all-channel rule being delayed until 1964 and expensive converters for sets earlier than that date, and, as I just mentioned, the end of the "license to print money days" of the 1950s and early 1960s for stations. But I wonder if there are other common denominators such as undercapitalization, inferior equipment and less-trained personnel and talent, and just plain bad luck that prevented most of these third station-in-a-market UHFs from making significant impact upon the Nielsens until, in some cases, the 1990s? Unlike WATU, some threw in the towel entirely, including perhaps the most famous case of WJJY-TV in the Springfield, Illinois market (see the tribute website: http://www.brainmist.com/wjjy_tv/wjjy_tv.htm).

Are there any stories in your neck of the woods (apologies to Al Roker) about late '60s/early '70s network UHF affils that always seemed to be the brink of failure, but somehow got through? I could mention several others, but in the Christmas spirit, I shall consider it more blessed to let my friends give their stories.
 
There were two UHF affiliate start-ups in Missouri around that time, KMTC Channel 27 (now KSFX) in Springfield and KCBJ Channel 17 (now KMIZ) in Jefferson City. Both stations went on the air in, respectively, 1968 and 1971 and started out as ABC affiliates. And they shared another thing in common in that they switched networks (in the latter case, not once but twice).

In the case of Channel 27, it became a primary ABC affiliate when it signed on, but lost its affiliation with the alphabet network in 1985 to then-two-year old independent KSPR Channel 33, principally because of the network's dissatisfaction with KMTC station management. As a result Channel 27, by this time known as KDEB, became an independent and then one of the charter affiliates of the then-up and coming Fox network in 1986. As far as I know, it's the only charter Fox affiliate in the state of Missouri to still be affiliated with the network (Fox's charter affiliates in St. Louis and Kansas City switched networks in 1994-95). In 2005 it changed its call letters to KSFX to reflect its Fox affiliation (the call letters standing for Ozarks Fox).

As for Channel 17, it switched affiliation to NBC in 1982 due to longtime NBC affiliate KOMU-TV joining the ABC network, which was at the time the top-rated TV network in the country. However, only three years later KOMU returned to NBC while ABC switched back to Channel 17 (as a side note, the only other network affiliate in the area at the time, KRCG Channel 13, has remained a CBS affiliate since it signed on in 1955). Around the time of rejoining ABC, they adopted the current call letters KMIZ-TV. As of now, KMIZ-TV is still affiliated with the ABC network.
 
WIIL-TV 38 Terre Haute IN (later WBAK-TV, now WFXW) started in 1973 as that market's ABC affiliate. Previously, the Alphabet Network had been split between WTWO/2 (NBC) and WTHI/10 (CBS). The Terre Haute market currently has no ABC station since 38 switched to Fox a few years ago.

WXOW-TV 19 LaCrosse WI signed on as a semi-satellite to ABC affiliate WKOW-TV Madison in 1970, with its own ads and newscasts. When it went totally standalone in 1980, it put WQOW-TV 18 on the air from Eau Claire as a satellite.

Both of Palm Springs CA's full-powered stations signed on in 1968 - KMIR-TV 36 (NBC) and KPLM-TV 42 (now KESQ - ABC).

Monterrey CA's CBS affiliate KMST-TV 46 (now KION) began operations in 1969.

I don't know if this technically counts, but WICD 15 Champaign IL came on the air in 1967 as a full-powered semi-satellite of NBC (now ABC) affiliate WICS 20 Springfield. It was the result of a combination of the previous Champaign-Urbana NBC affiliate WCHU 33 and Danville's WICD (ex-WDAN-TV) 24, both of whom would be considered LPTV stations today given their miniscule power levels.
 
I think a number of 60s start-up UHFs made it quite well in the 60s and 70s. I've mentioned before WCCB/18/36 in Charlotte that came on in 1964 with the scraps of all three networks, and went on to be full time ABC in 1967. Sure, they were winning few if any ratings contests, but as a viewer I think it was pretty obvious they were making money (of course, Charlotte was the largest 2 station market in the country at the time). In this region, I can think of two more smaller market stations that debuted about the same time WJKS/17 in Jacksonville and WJCL/22 in Savannah. WJCL had the luxury of being all ABC from the start, while WJKS did get scraps from all three for a while, before finally becoming all ABC. True, 17 in JAX later switched nets several times, I think they did ok before a number of new UHF stations came on in JAX. Perhaps the most sucessful start-up UHF station in the 60s was Louisville's WLKY/32 which had the audacity to start-up in 1961(!) with ABC. Aren't they now the #1 station in the market with CBS? BTW, WATU/WAGT/26 in AUgusta was owned by the same CHarlotte businessmen who founded independent WCTU/36 in Charlotte in 1968 (they also had CPs for WNTU/33 in Norfolk and WMTU/30 in Memphis which were never built). WCTU immediately had problems and the corp went bankrupt. They managed to sell WCTU to TED TURNER who eventually made a go of WRET as a regional independent, then a NBC affil (WCCB became a successful indie). I believe WATU may have actually gone off the air due to the problems of WCTU as much as anything else, since it was inevitable they would have eventually gotten the NBC affil, if they'd held out a while longer...
 
WLKY didn't have much choice; WAVE was NBC primary
and WHAS, CBS primary, connections that went back to
radio. (WHAS made a major, major mistake switching to
ABC, IMO.)

I've mentioned WRDU/WRDC Raleigh/Durham, which signed
on in 1968 and took the leftovers from CBS and NBC that
WTVD turned down, until the FCC forced WTVD to pick
either CBS or NBC in 1971. WTVD took CBS; NBC is still
struggling (now on WNCN) in the Triangle.

Likewise, WBMG/WIAT Birmingham, which signed on in 1965,
as well as WCFT Tuscaloosa (1967) and WHMA/WJSU Anniston
(1969), all of which picked up CBS and NBC shows rejected by
WAPI/WVTM Birmingham until 1970, when they became fulltime
CBS affiliates (WCFT and WJSU combined into "ABC 33/40" after
WBRC became a Fox o&o).

Two NBC affiliates which took a mighty gamble in the late '60s,
up against established VHF CBS affiliates: WBBH/20 Ft. Myers, FL,
and WCWB (WMGT)/41 Macon, GA. And an ABC affiliate for the
southern end of the Tampa Bay Market: WXLT( WWSB)/40 Sarasota,
covering the area that couldn't be reached by Channel 10 WLCY (WTSP)
because its transmitter is well north of its competitors', to prevent
short-spacing to Miami's Channel 10. Channel 40 signed on in 1971,
and I've heard that ABC wanted to drop it when it switched to WFTS/28
in the Bay Area, but with ABC now on UHF in Tampa/St. Petersburg,
Sarasota/Bradenton would still almost need an ABC station, so Ch. 40
has stayed with ABC.

And WDHN/18 Dothan, AL (ABC, 1970), also up against a long-established VHF
CBS affiliate, WTVY/4.
 
bpatrick said:
[WWSB] Channel 40 signed on in 1971,
and I've heard that ABC wanted to drop it when it switched to WFTS/28
in the Bay Area, but with ABC now on UHF in Tampa/St. Petersburg,
Sarasota/Bradenton would still almost need an ABC station, so Ch. 40
has stayed with ABC.

Yes, that's correct. This ran in Adweek Western Edition in October 1994 (sorry, cannot link; this is from my local library research database; plus, this is most all of the article):

"WWSB, ABC's affiliate in Sarasota, Fla., received its official six-month notice of affiliation termination from ABC on Sept. 27, according to station general manager Stan Crumley. Unless WWSB's petition to the FCC to stop the termination prevails, the network will end its 23-year relationship with the affiliate on April 2. The station [...] filed a complaint with the FCC that month alleging Scripps Howard Broadcasting [...] influenced the network to end its affiliation with WWSB. WWSB contends in its filing that Scripps made the disaffiliation of WWSB part of the deal to affiliate WFTS. Scripps and ABC denied in their responses to the FCC that any agreement about WWSB was made."

Somehow, WWSB kept that affiliation. I'd imagine it was the complaint they filed.
 
bpatrick said:
WLKY didn't have much choice; WAVE was NBC primary
and WHAS, CBS primary, connections that went back to
radio. (WHAS made a major, major mistake switching to
ABC, IMO.)

WLKY was very aggressive promoting their station in a VHF world. It was the work of WLKY that encouraged a gathering of investors to pursue the construction permit that would become WDRB Channel 41. WLKY pulled enough viewers to the UHF band that WDRB rode on their coattails.
 
I think the impetus of the WWSB/WFTS dispute may have been the location of their transmitters -- WFTS's is in Riverview, in central Hillsborough County, and WWSB's in Parrish, in northern Manatee County -- about 20 miles south of Riverview. The locations no doubt give ABC ammunition to drop WWSB from the network.

WWSB's signal, at least in the analog days, came in with a clear picture in Southern Hillsborough and Pinellas.
 
But wasn't that about as far south as Channel 10's signal
could go? I remember WFLA and WTVT could be picked up
in Sarasota and Manatee counties but not WLCY/WTSP,
while Channel 10 served some counties north of the immediate
Bay Area that got CBS and NBC from Orlando. Likewise, I
wonder (since I don't live in Florida anymore) how far south
WFTS's signal does reach; there has to be a reason WWSB
would fight to keep its ABC affiliation and it must be related to
WFTS's coverage area to the south.

BTW, I understand that a lot of people from Sarasota southward
have relied on Ft. Myers' WINK for CBS since the switch in the Bay
Area, because WTSP's signal doesn't reach far enough south.
 
bpatrick said:
Likewise, WBMG/WIAT Birmingham, which signed on in 1965,

[SNIP]

And WDHN/18 Dothan, AL (ABC, 1970), also up against a long-established VHF
CBS affiliate, WTVY/4.

Which begs a few questions as they pertained to both these stations:

WHY did they skimp on important considerations as tower height??   WBMG-42 started on a very short stick (650' HAAT), and WDHN-18 fired up with the same 700-foot tower they use, 40 years later.

Given, I was not in the room when the decisions were being made, e.g. financing and such .... that said, it puzzles me that both of these start-ups did not seek to build the highest tower possible.  Aside from the obvious benefit of coverage, both stations would have had a more competitive footing with their long-entrenched VHF rivals. 

In WDHN's case, it was different than WJJY in that ABC was - and even today IS - poorly covered in that part of the country.  I can only speculate what would have happened if WDHN had borrowed a little more to buy a larger transmitter and put up a 1,500+' stick, say just east of the river in Early County, Georgia.  For one thing, 18 might well have positioned itself to be the prime ABC affil not just for a bigger part of southeast Alabama (I'm thinking cities like Troy), but also for another medium market without an ABC of its own: Albany, Georgia.  My guess is, WDHN would have recouped the extra money needed to build the larger plant, and today would not be seen as the big joke it is.  2010 and they're still on a tree stump.  Seriously.

As for WBMG, well that begs a hornet's nest of what-ifs.  1965: both established Birmingham VHFs (WBRC-6 / WAPI-13) had no local color origination.  Only pass-through color from the networks.  Yes, 42 started with a color film chain, but instead of accepting charity from WBRC (42's first cameras were hand-me-downs from channel 6, who gladly offered them figuring that 42 would be a big thorn in 13's side) ... anyway, this was 1965.  There was no argument that local color was the future.  6 and 13, one presumed, were still servicing some debt from the B/W investments .... so, as long as 42 is rolling the dice to be the third TV station, what better than to make a literally colorful debut? 

I mean, it's not like 42's majority founder was a pauper; it was Southern Broadcasting out of Winston-Salem, who owned no less than WSGN-AM 610 in Birmingham, and at the time WSGN was printing money as one of the most acclaimed top-40s in the country.   In Huntsville, WAAY-AM parlayed the big bucks they were raking in as a rock & roll station into buying a failing local UHF (WAFG-31), and turning the station into a remarkable success story as WAAY-TV.  Why, then, didn't Channel 42 adopt the call letters of what was already a solid, established broadcast identity in Birmingham?

We can only imagine what could have been had a WSGN-TV Channel 42 signed on from the tallest tower on Red Mountain, with 1,000,000-plus watts, a full-color facility, right down to the tape machines and studio cameras.  Birmingham's first color newscast. 

Nobody could say for sure, but I suspect Tommy Charles would have been more serious with those sportscasts in the '70s.  No balloons or throwing wadded scripts behind him. 

Starting a new business is always a gamble.  But cheaping out at the start is just as bad as running the business poorly, in my two cents.

--Russell
 
Do you think a little extra power would have made Channel 42 the
sole CBS affiliate for central Alabama? In other words, would Channel
33 in Tuscaloosa and Channel 40 in Anniston have been necessary?
And what, then, would ABC have done for an affiliate when WBRC
went to Fox?

You're right, though, about Southern Broadcasting; they owned another
major top-40 station, WKIX Raleigh, as well as WGHP-TV High Point, NC.
In fact I've often said that, when I lived in Birmingham in the early '70s,
something about WBMG reminded me more of an ABC station than a CBS
one, and I don't mean just the weak dial position (maybe it was the newscast,
or having wrestling as WGHP, WLOS, and--at the time--WXIA did, or its greater
willingness to program game shows like those ABC affiliates in High Point, Asheville,
and Atlanta).

Now I have one question slightly off-topic but has bothered me for decades:
Why did neither Chs. 6, 13, nor 42 never adopt "Eyewitness News" as the name
of their newscast?
 
bpatrick said:
Do you think a little extra power would have made Channel 42 the
sole CBS affiliate for central Alabama? In other words, would Channel
33 in Tuscaloosa and Channel 40 in Anniston have been necessary?

Being a high number, I suspect WBMG having a more powerful/taller facility would have helped them more in penetration and metro coverage than in pure distance. Tuscaloosa might could have been covered, but terrain to the east may well have still necessitated a station for Anniston.

Anyway -- a better signal, with a full-color plant, would have put 42 in a very competitive position instead of being the laughingstock it was. I mean, folks in Birmingham proper had trouble picking it up clearly.

WDHN, on channel 18, totally blew it on this count. The flatter terrain of southeast Alabama and region + low UHF channel number, would have equaled an impressive signal. Look at what that investment did for WJJY-14 in Illinois (forgetting the profoundly bad decision to put such a heavy antenna on its tower). And, unlike 14, WDHN had no other ABC competition within 100 miles.

Now I have one question slightly off-topic but has bothered me for decades:
Why did neither Chs. 6, 13, nor 42 never adopt "Eyewitness News" as the name
of their newscast?

That is a real head-scratcher.

--Russell
 
Now I have one question slightly off-topic but has bothered me for decades:
Why did neither Chs. 6, 13, nor 42 never adopt "Eyewitness News" as the name
of their newscast?

THIS SITE says that WCFT/Tuscaloosa has that name for their newscast in the 80's.
 
I knew WCFT had it, but why, in the '70s when the name
was particularly popular, was it never picked up by a
Birmingham station?
 
As an interesting aside to the WAGT/WAGU Augusta saga: A friend of mine who lived there told me that at one time when they had no spots to run in commercial cutaways, that they would play songs!!! I assume that they sat on a logo/slide while the song played. I thought back then it was cool, but now looking back at it, not so much---financially bad for them.
 
Russell W. said:
Which begs a few questions as they pertained to both these stations:

WHY did they skimp on important considerations as tower height?? WBMG-42 started on a very short stick (650' HAAT), and WDHN-18 fired up with the same 700-foot tower they use, 40 years later.

I can only speculate but I would suggest a few possibilities:

- Nobody was willing to lend them enough money to build a tall tower.

Over the previous ten years or so, UHF stations had been failing left and right. At the time, bankers weren't particularly known for gambling. (there might be something to be said for that (grin)!) Could be they built the most powerful facility they could raise the capital for.

- Diminishing returns and very expensive transmitters.

Power is lost in the feedline much more quickly on UHF than on VHF. A taller tower relates directly to a longer transmission line. Could be they couldn't afford *both* the taller tower *and* the more powerful transmitter (and/or extra utility bills) to maintain power at the antenna.

- Competition from outside the market in the areas a more powerful transmitter would reach.

Might fringe-area viewers be pointing their VHF antennas at Pensacola (WEAR channel 3) or Columbus (WTVM channel 9)? Might WDHN have figured there would be little point in delivering a signal to places like Opp and Eufaula where ABC viewers were already in the habit of watching some other station?

All that is only speculation.
 
bpatrick said:
I knew WCFT had it, but why, in the '70s when the name
was particularly popular, was it never picked up by a
Birmingham station?

Because it was due of a "deal" between the Birmingham stations and those in Nashville and Atlanta which had kept the "Eyewitness News" brand from being used in the Birmingham market. Similar to the "lack" of Eyewitness News in Denver, that was due to an agreement between the Denver stations and Salt Lake City's KSL because "..KSL-TV had the exclusive rights to that name in the Rocky Mountain region and that included Denver". That is if one is to believe a number of those posters over at TVnewstalk.net who swear that they are always right since the swear to Wikipedia, even if they are the ones doing the editing.

NO I don't believe any of it but one can't tell these people that they are wrong..oh well..

My guess is that maybe the B'ham stations didn't want to pay the fee to use that brand since the name "Eyewitness News" is indeed copyrighted so it costs money to use it. Could be the reason in the case with Denver too even though KWGN did use that name for a years way back in the early 80's.
 
I'd go with that last possibility. In the I-85 corridor
(Raleigh/Durham to Atlanta) there was an "Eyewitness
News" in every market: Raleigh/Durham (WTVD, still uses
it); Greensboro/Winston-Salem/High Point (WGHP); Charlotte
(WSOC); Greenville/Spartanburg/Asheville (WSPA); Atlanta
(WQXI/WXIA at the time I'm talking about, the early '70s),
and, obviously, nobody in Atlanta tried to keep WSPA from
using the title, nor did anyone stop WTVC Chattanooga from
using it.

I once asked an employee at WBRC why they didn't use it;
he gave me an answer that amounted to "if it ain't broke, don't
fix it." So I, too, would suspect that no station would shell out
the money for it--a little surprising since WBMG and WGHP were
sister stations.
 
bpatrick said:
I'd go with that last possibility. In the I-85 corridor
(Raleigh/Durham to Atlanta) there was an "Eyewitness
News" in every market: Raleigh/Durham (WTVD, still uses
it); Greensboro/Winston-Salem/High Point (WGHP); Charlotte
(WSOC); Greenville/Spartanburg/Asheville (WSPA); Atlanta
(WQXI/WXIA at the time I'm talking about, the early '70s),
and, obviously, nobody in Atlanta tried to keep WSPA from
using the title, nor did anyone stop WTVC Chattanooga from
using it.

I once asked an employee at WBRC why they didn't use it;
he gave me an answer that amounted to "if it ain't broke, don't
fix it." So I, too, would suspect that no station would shell out
the money for it--a little surprising since WBMG and WGHP were
sister stations.

I-85 begins in Petersburg ( Richmond ) Virginia..don't forget that local channel 8 WXEX had "Eyewitness News" all the way until the mid 90's even though current WRIC would like everyone to forget such a title ever existed in Virginia including WAVY, WTKR, WSLS, WVIR as well as WXEX/WRIC and more recently ( though never used ) WHSV ( Winchester only ).
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom