"FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS!" Every stinkin' break!! Now, I used Upside on occasion in Idaho (great for Boise Sinclair stations), but a moot point here in WA with the reservation just a few miles' drive away. The commercials are just redundant at this point.
CashbackforgasoptionnotavailableinNewJerseyorWisconsin
Those are so irritating. Along with the 27 cash ones that were sponsoring the entire ABC radio newscast breaks for a while. (And maybe still do). I guess the networks need to take anything they can to keep the radio news division alive.
2) "The average American is now spending $5000 per year on gas. That's crazy!" Yes it is crazy. Because it is not the truth- not even close. Do the math. We know the average American drives around 11,000 miles per year. In a car that on average is getting 25 miles per gallon. Which means he/she is using on average about 440 gallons of gas per year. Even at 4 bucks a gallon that's only $1760 per year. So the entire premise of the ad is a big fat lie. What that says about the advertiser I leave to you. I am an insurance broker- the data provided comes directly from one of our national carriers.
I'd forgotten about that. Don't remember ever hearing one of the ads, but recall reading/hearing about them.I even remember Mutual, back in the late 1970s, running ads for the Bulgaria travel ministry nearly every hour in one of the two hourly commercial positions.
I'd forgotten about that. Don't remember ever hearing one of the ads, but recall reading/hearing about them.
Do you think Mutual talked to the feds before agreeing to run them? You'd think there'd have been a discernible number of listeners who'd have been less than pleased hearing ads for vacations in a Communist nation. Would they have done anything akin to a cost benefit analysis?The weirdest thing about them is that they weren't produced spots, but essentially a "live read" which Mutual had one of the anchors, the late Dan Scanlan, read and then they aired that every time it was scheduled.
Do you think Mutual talked to the feds before agreeing to run them? You'd think there'd have been a discernible number of listeners who'd have been less than pleased hearing ads for vacations in a Communist nation. Would they have done anything akin to a cost benefit analysis?
Ad income v. indignant/lost listeners? If so, guess we know which way they decided.