DanStrassberg said:You're kinda confused. These stations do brokered time.
No, I'm not confused at all. I understand what time-brokered stations do and why they do it.
DanStrassberg said:As a percentage of revenues, brokered-time stations take more money to the bottom line than conventionally programmed stations.
Not if the 'conventionally' programmed station is competitive and well-programmed.
DanStrassberg said:You may not like what you hear on brokered-time stations. That's fine; you are not part of the target market for the various programs. The program producers must believe that they are getting their money's worth or they wouldn't keep on buying the time. Bear in mind that it isn't what you like or what you BELIEVE would make money on a station that necessarily makes money.
I am part of the target for some time-brokered programming, and know first hand the programming is awful. Most others I know in these "targets" don't listen to these programs either.
DanStrassberg said:The program producers must believe that they are getting their money's worth or they wouldn't keep on buying the time. Bear in mind that it isn't what you like or what you BELIEVE would make money on a station that necessarily makes money.
If the total amount of the purchased time is covered in donations/ads.....then the program placement is considered a success. It doesn't matter if the program audience is one person or 1 million. If a program has one listener and that listener covers the entire broadcast cost in donation, then it's considered successful. Quite a waste of signal to reach 1 listener.
DanStrassberg said:I am a life-long liberal Democrat but I do not believe that, with the exception of a few markets, Progressive talk has demonstrated an ability to generate the kind of profits that other formats generate.
Frankly, I don't care if it is Progressive, Middle of the road...or whatever...
We just need more alternatives to WRKO....which is a badly programmed station.
DanStrassberg said:I sincerely believe that there is a genuine conspiracy by the radical (and not-so-radical) right to use hate-mail and threats of boycotts to intimidate advertisers and prospective advertisers on Progressive talk. I also believe that the fact that Air America did such a truly miraculous job of implanting its brand in the public consciousness was largely the result of very clever work by the righties who knew that the outfit was mismanaged from the git-go and would go down in flames if given half a chance. It was a brilliant strategy to kill Progressive talk: Make sure that Air America is 1) indelibly identified with Progressive talk and 2) shoots itself in the foot (or someplace higher and much more painful) at every conceivable opportunity. (#2 didn't take much effort.) This story is a sad commentary on a lot that's wrong with America today but the strategy could not have worked better for the righties.
OK....Once we get to the "conspiracy theories"...I think thats a signal that the conversation is near it's end.