Gosh, that's not a problem, as my oscilliscope easily shows the there's no pinchoff.
You are correct, my part 15 AM audio does not have the intentional introduced frequency distortion commercial high
powered stations are required to. If I wiished to hear the delayed but BBP processed mike audio, that would be so easy, yet annoying.
Once the audio off the server is BBP tamed, the ART VLA does more than a fine job, it's amazing.
But I'll explain again to those who never heard my testimony.
The ART PRO VLA was worth the the 300 dollars, but not "worth writng home about".
It was designed FOR vocal processing in the recording industry, and it's great for a voice, or maybe one instrument, but
has no idea what to "follow" in complex musical waveforms.
I could hear an improvement in average RMS, but no real audio magic.
Introduce BBP control over the audio off the server, and it was incredible, but I could never get the huge old fashioned
big iron swing and thump I was looking for. So I put ART VLA after, in a two step series, one fast clip, the next @3:1
ratio, then pushed hard on output while watching the scope.
Smacking audio magic.
The NRSC "mask" is an abomination.
I was taught that actual "real" protection as defined in the old days by clears, regionals, etc, actually did provide for
15 khz audio.
It was not until later political and economic pressures overcame the original 1927 bandplan that this broke down.
You were supposed to even be in touch with and know the CEs at the station you were co-channel with and maybe even those on adjacents.
I am quoting DE Wiggins as one of my instructors at Valparaiso.
It probably would have been better for AM if Fm had come along much earlier, to provide the exteremly local high frequencies do well.
I would be extremely embarassed to overmodulate.
I do appreciate that I can measure the perfect 150% modulation BBP permits right there on the scope face, something
that was not possible to do with the VLA alone.
And I HAVE tried the BBP set at 7.5 khz.
It's still what was defined as "frequency distortion" as we measured it in the lab on big ancient General Radio oscillators, bridges, etc.
Any intentional adulteration or limitation to the best a technolgy can be deliver is suspect.
It would be like a tire manufacturer being told tthey must now make tires that don't stop well unless you are going in a more or less straight line.
Why should radio have to submit to disregard for proper engineering?
For politcal reasons, stupidity, or the rush to things newer?
I just don't get it.