And that would make Sliwa a sellout. If he has any sense of principle remaining, he should keep his word.
Last edited:
And that would make Sliwa a sellout. If he has any sense of principle remaining, he should keep his word.
With the enormous percentage of registered Democrats in NYC, no other outcome could have been expected. But, because WABC and Catsimatidis have a position they believe in, they could not be expected to take any other position.Overall, it wasn't a good night for WABC and its sham "Editorial Board" as its top endorsed candidates (Cuomo and Ciattarelli) lost. Even an unknown Republican City Council candidate from the Bronx, a relative of John Catsimatidis', failed to get 10 percent of the vote in Riverdale against the incumbent Democrat councilator.
I don't think that any of the WABC commentators or its owner thought there would be a different outcome. The best they might have expected was to have Cuomo elected instead of the actual winner.The station, its owner and his assembled Peanut Gallery of court jesters, really thought they could ride the coattails of Trump's return to D.C. to influence big gains locally. But NYC and NJ voters rejected that and left them with major egg on their faces.
There is most definitely egg on the faces of several over there. Catsimatidis is bloviating loudly to anyone who'll listen that he's ready to pack up and leave New York. Personally, at the end of the day I think he'll stay. But at the same time, I (and others) would like to see him put his money where his mouth is.Losers in an election don't "have egg on their face". Anyone who backs an underdog can be expected to understand that their chances of an upset are slime to none.
Sure, let's encourage those who provide jobs and services to leave the city. Do you think anyone else will come in to replace them?There is most definitely egg on the faces of several over there. Catsimatidis is bloviating loudly to anyone who'll listen that he's ready to pack up and leave New York. Personally, at the end of the day I think he'll stay. But at the same time, I (and others) would like to see him put his money where his mouth is.
I think that those who severely disagree with the new office of the mayor will likely want to hear more, not less, talk that reflects their views.The faux "fear" and "anger" aren't drawing serious attention, and not the kind that will bring in new listeners to WABC.
Sure, let's encourage those who provide jobs and services to leave the city. Do you think anyone else will come in to replace them?
I think that those who severely disagree with the new office of the mayor will likely want to hear more, not less, talk that reflects their views.
WOR, not WGN.Yes but will that result in WABC gaining new listeners? While the new mayor's financial plans could certainly go afoul, most of the syndicated conservative talk programming in the NYC area has gone over to either IHeart's WGN or Salem's WNYM. So, unless one of WABC's personalities really becomes a "hit" with the local audience, my prediction is that, at least in the short term, WABC will see no audience gains even from those who disliked the NYC and NJ election results.
WOR, not WGN.
I appreciate your candor, but Cats and his management team might not. I have no way to identify you, but they surely will be able to figure it out from the various breadcrumbs you've left. Maybe you should consider being a bit more circumspect?There is most definitely egg on the faces of several over there. Catsimatidis is bloviating loudly to anyone who'll listen that he's ready to pack up and leave New York. Personally, at the end of the day I think he'll stay. But at the same time, I (and others) would like to see him put his money where his mouth is.
As I write this, I'm preparing to edit this week's Cats Roundtable program. I'm looking forward to hearing how Cats and his guests analyze what went down on Election Night, and how far they'll go with the continued scaremongering.
The faux "fear" and "anger" aren't drawing serious attention, and not the kind that will bring in new listeners to WABC.
I was thinking the same thing. Best to obscure things if the hand that writes your checks might take umbrage with your comments. Not that I think it ought to be that way, but knowing how few and far between radio jobs are - you gotta hold on to the one you got for dear life.I appreciate your candor, but Cats and his management team might not. I have no way to identify you, but they surely will be able to figure it out from the various breadcrumbs you've left. Maybe you should consider being a bit more circumspect?
WABC is, based on 6+ or 12+, in the top 10 of all stations in the market. It is sustainable with local accounts and local agency buys. Since the "market" is less than 50% in New York City (Manhattan and the Boroughs), there is plenty of LI, NJ, Upstate NY and even SW CT audience for advertisers to want.Yes but will that result in WABC gaining new listeners? While the new mayor's financial plans could certainly go afoul, most of the syndicated conservative talk programming in the NYC area has gone over to either IHeart's WGN or Salem's WNYM. So, unless one of WABC's personalities really becomes a "hit" with the local audience, my prediction is that, at least in the short term, WABC will see no audience gains even from those who disliked the NYC and NJ election results.
I don't work for Red Apple. I'm an independent contractor.I was thinking the same thing. Best to obscure things if the hand that writes your checks might take umbrage with your comments. Not that I think it ought to be that way, but knowing how few and far between radio jobs are - you gotta hold on to the one you got for dear life.
Who knows, WOR may find a slot for him thereafter.