• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Washington Post could fold entire sports section

Here is more fallout on the cuts at Washington Post.
 
Based on what I'm hearing, it would seem that Trump and Bezos are both anti-Jeffersons-- Jefferson wanted "newspapers without a government," but Trump and Bezos want "government without newspapers."

I don't see it that way. Bezos didn't buy the Post to shut it down. Gannett could have done that. Lots of other companies that buy newspapers could have done that. Bezos bought it to save it. But when it loses $100 million, that's not his fault. He gave them free reign to run it the way they wanted, and they did a bad job. Don't blame Bezos. Blame the people at the paper. They're the ones who lost money. The publisher warned them two years ago:


Were they not paying attention? Did they think he was joking? When the boss tells you to do a better job, maybe you should listen.

Anyone who was blindsided by the wasn't paying attention. They were warned. They need to get into the 21st century and save journalism.
 
How can birds be racist????

Kind of smacks of "anti-woke" humor a bit to me (the Washington Post, from what I've read over the years, has long been a popular target of criticism from conservative alt-right groups and other such entities).

That said, to take all that away and get back to one of the core issues at hand (and the reason for this thread), it is too bad that print media across the board (and, by extension, non-Internet electronic media such as over the air radio and TV) is suffering so much at the hands of, among other things, Facebook, X and Google, not to mention all the up-and-coming AI-oriented companies).

While it's true that online (social) media has so much potential to be so much better than the traditional media it's displacing, and in many ways it is, it has become so ideologically fragmented – especially over the past decade or so – that there isn't much of a sense of unity anymore, and extremism on all sides has become a major problem with no clear solutions.

c
 
This just in: Washington Post publisher & CEO Will Lewis resigns:


Bezos, who had not commented on the job reductions, issued a statement on Saturday saying, “The Post has an essential journalistic mission and an extraordinary opportunity. Each and every day our readers give us a roadmap of success. The data tells us what is valuable and where to focus. Jeff, along with Matt and Adam, are positioned to lead the Post into an exciting and thriving next chapter.”
 
This just in: Washington Post publisher & CEO Will Lewis resigns:

NPR version:


Excerpt:

He {Lewis} was effectively AWOL as the paper's scope, ambitions and journalism were radically redefined and constricted. Lewis played no visible role in announcing the layoffs in a mandatory Zoom call for the newsroom on Wednesday. Nor did he publicly address the paper's readers to allay their concerns.

The coup de grace came just a day later when Lewis was photographed in Northern California walking a red carpet at a Super Bowl event.


Some great leadership there.

We probably haven't heard the end of this.
 
Some great leadership there.

We probably haven't heard the end of this.

He failed. He's to blame for the losses and the layoffs. My sense is he was dead man walking two weeks ago.

The new boss has more of Bezos' interest in digital media. His job will be to rebuild around the interests of the readers, without the baggage from the past.
 
How can birds be racist????

Kind of smacks of "anti-woke" humor a bit to me (the Washington Post, from what I've read over the years, has long been a popular target of criticism from conservative alt-right groups and other such entities).
Have you ever read The Onion? It's been around since the '90s, lampooning just about every aspect of life through exaggeration and absurdity. The Bee plows the same ground, but its focus is mainly politics and social issues, from a generally conservative perspective but making valid points while doing so, and it's not afraid to mock aspects of the GOP, MAGA and the people and policies connected to them as well as those connected to the various institutions of liberalism. Its brand of humor, like The Onion's, sometimes makes me wince slightly, but I laugh nonetheless because I've spent my whole life taking hardly anything seriously unless I absolutely have to. An extensive study of racism in birds is a send-up of the puffed-up, absurdly academic "journalistic" exercises that the Post, the New York Times, the BBC, etc., have devoted extensive space and time to over the years. I can't get angry or offended by it. It's funny, dammit.
 
NPR version:


Excerpt:

He {Lewis} was effectively AWOL as the paper's scope, ambitions and journalism were radically redefined and constricted. Lewis played no visible role in announcing the layoffs in a mandatory Zoom call for the newsroom on Wednesday. Nor did he publicly address the paper's readers to allay their concerns.

The coup de grace came just a day later when Lewis was photographed in Northern California walking a red carpet at a Super Bowl event.


Some great leadership there.

We probably haven't heard the end of this.
Dang from staffing cuts to their current CEO being removed. It will be interesting to see the next CEO of the Washington Post navigating their current state and make them remain relevant to national News coverage.
 
The Washington Post has a lot of work to do to catch up to the New York Times in terms of web traffic. That's really where the game is now. Selling physical copies isn't the future. It's very possible at some point the Post will stop printing physical copies.

As of 2025, The Washington Post has seen a significant decline in its print circulation, dropping below 100,000 for the first time in 55 years, with approximately 97,000 daily print subscribers and 2.5 million digital subscribers. As of August 2025, The New York Times had approximately 11.88 million total subscribers, including 580,000 print subscribers and 11.3 million digital subscribers.

 
Perhaps none. It may be that anyone cancelling their WaPo subscription might be completely done with newspapers.
True but some of the things I heard about the cuts at the Washington Post its this other angle about boycotting it owner Jeff Bezos that goes with that reaction.

But as mentioned its also about boosting web traffic that's a factor here if Washington Post is going to remain relevant on the national levels along with LA Times, New York Times, USA Today and Wall Street Journal having to face the same issues on the dwindling print readership vs digital subscriptions traffic. Also competing against the wire services like AP and Reuters for national News content is a factor here.
 
A new media option for people in DC, from the former owner of the Washington Post:


However, it's not traditional print media. It's podcasts and newsletters.
 
A new media option for people in DC, from the former owner of the Washington Post:


However, it's not traditional print media. It's podcasts and newsletters.
Congrats to Graham Media for stepping up to the plate for CityCast Washington DC and heres another one specifically for those that read the Washington Post for local news in the DC area. There's Washington City Paper that covers the metro well.



 
I've placed the below link in the CBS thread but I believe it belongs here as well.


If the commentary is accurate, then we are witnessing the weakening of both a commercial newspaper and a national commercial TV network in front of our very eyes.
 
If the commentary is accurate, then we are witnessing the weakening of both a commercial newspaper and a national commercial TV network in front of our very eyes.

As I said in the other thread, the Washington Post has lost 2/3rds of its print subscribers in ten years. That was before the staff cuts.

The weakening happened a long time ago. The firings are just the budgets catching up to the loss of revenue. We saw it in radio too.
 


Back
Top Bottom