Since you asked...WNTIRadio said:There are translators in NYC that could certainly fit under the same idea. We are not talking about new transmitters, since NYC is about as maxed as anyplace. But, the existing translators are there.
Of what translators do you speak of? The only existing translator that puts a signal anywhere near NYC is W276AQ 103.1 in Fort Lee. I know the owners aren't inclined to sell (I work for them). There is the 106.3 debacle, but that translator has been relegated through all of the downgrades to near useless. Other than that, you're imagining things that aren't there.
Also, even if a translator *were* somehow to be shoehorned into the dial on NYC and transmit 99 watts from 4 Times Square, it still won't cover a good portion of the market. Because the NYC metro is so geographically large, it's impossible for a translator to cover the 50% of the market, much less all 5 boroughs of NYC. It's a long way from Pehlam bay to the southern tip of Staten Island. It's different in a smaller city, where a 250 watt translator can cover a good chunk of the market.
http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/f...&slat2=&NS=N&dlon2=&mlon2=&slon2=&EW=W&size=9
92.7, Brooklyn and New York (not Garden City's 92.7)
94.3, Brooklyn
95.1, Brooklyn
95.9, Manhattan
96.7, Brooklyn
98.3, Brooklyn
99.9, Brooklyn
101.5, Manhattan
103.1, Brooklyn
105.5, Manhattan
106.3, New York (we'll see about this one)
107.9, Brooklyn
And you are correct, NYC is huge! I don't expect full Citywide coverage from any of these possibilities. Remember, they are for FM presence, only.
That is the intention, no matter what "they" are saying.
And David, you are right, you need an attorney, but that's why they get paid the big bucks.
Emmis/Disney proved one thing: there is no format not worth trashing for the right deal.
This is NYC!
Jeff in Sa-ra-so-ta!