amisdead said:Running news/talk programming on 96.7 is one of the smartest things Citadel can do based on the ears they are capable of reaching with the signal. 96.7 is second-tier signal and always will be, however, the most densely-populated areas where the signal does poorest are in ethnically high parts of southern Dallas county, areas that have little interest in right-wing talk.
Smart move. I wonder if this is a preemptive move against the long-rumored news/talk on 97.1 that I keep hearing of.
Coverage wasn't the reason. I've posted the AM-to-FM discussion before...including in 2008:
http://boards.radio-info.com/smf/index.php?topic=105669.0
The number of news/talk FMs has only gone up since then in other markets. I would think Citadel's chapter 11 is a factor...but coverage isn't since WBAP is 50 kw day and night. Coverage hasn't been an issue in other markets either...KSL Salt Lake City is also 50 kw day and night and still created a KSL-FM. Ditto for KCBS San Francisco's addition of KFRC-FM 106.9 there. In both cases, the FM has less coverage area than the AM...it's about getting the format on FM.
The issue for many heritage AM stations is aging demos...moving to or adding FM exposes the stations to people under 40 who have long given up listening to AM and don't consider it an option. AM is dead to young listeners. When Domingo has posted the 18-34 PPMs, no AM appears in the the top 25. In that demo, KTCK which otherwise dominates KESN and KRLD-FM, falls behind or is at parity with those two. If people are aging out 25-54 and no young people are coming in, there is no way long-term to maintain the 25-54 numbers since the math doesn't work. Getting on FM does allow exposure to people under 55.
The KCBS/KFRC-FM combo moved up to #2 25-54 PPMs after the addition of the FM. In the several years since it went from AM to FM, WTOP 103.5 Washington has also been dominant 25-54.