• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

WBAP Splits Evening Show

Re: And you think this is the new line-up because?

> > Do you think this is the final line-up because it's on the
>
> > website?
> > Inside information?
> > Confirmation of this comes from what source?
> >
> > Bull-sh*t!
>
>
> Sorry, my source is the WBAP Program Director, who announced
> the changes on Mark Davis' show on Monday morning. You can't
> a more authoritative source than the man who makes the
> decisions for the station.
>
Well, I guess that's good enough then.
Your original posting said nothing of the source of your statements, and I didn't see it in any of the other posts.
There is so much misinformation, speculation and outright lies posted in R-I that I had to assume the information you posted was just more of the same.
I missed Mark's show that day since I had to work, so I didn't hear that statement about David Gold/Mark Levin.
And if indeed it is all true, that means WBAP now has the two most irritating voices in political talk radio back-to-back.
Great.
 
Re: And you think this is the new line-up because?

> > > Do you think this is the final line-up because it's on
> the
> >
> > > website?
> > > Inside information?
> > > Confirmation of this comes from what source?
> > >
> > > Bull-sh*t!
> >
> >
> > Sorry, my source is the WBAP Program Director, who
> announced
> > the changes on Mark Davis' show on Monday morning. You
> can't
> > a more authoritative source than the man who makes the
> > decisions for the station.
> >
> Well, I guess that's good enough then.
> Your original posting said nothing of the source of your
> statements, and I didn't see it in any of the other posts.
> There is so much misinformation, speculation and outright
> lies posted in R-I that I had to assume the information you
> posted was just more of the same.
> I missed Mark's show that day since I had to work, so I
> didn't hear that statement about David Gold/Mark Levin.
> And if indeed it is all true, that means WBAP now has the
> two most irritating voices in political talk radio
> back-to-back.
> Great.

and grating :)
>
 
Re: And you think this is the new line-up because?

> > > > Do you think this is the final line-up because it's on
>
> > the
> > >
> > > > website?
> > > > Inside information?
> > > > Confirmation of this comes from what source?
> > > >
> > > > Bull-sh*t!
> > >
> > >
> > > Sorry, my source is the WBAP Program Director, who
> > announced
> > > the changes on Mark Davis' show on Monday morning. You
> > can't
> > > a more authoritative source than the man who makes the
> > > decisions for the station.
> > >
> > Well, I guess that's good enough then.
> > Your original posting said nothing of the source of your
> > statements, and I didn't see it in any of the other posts.
>
> > There is so much misinformation, speculation and outright
> > lies posted in R-I that I had to assume the information
> you
> > posted was just more of the same.
> > I missed Mark's show that day since I had to work, so I
> > didn't hear that statement about David Gold/Mark Levin.
> > And if indeed it is all true, that means WBAP now has the
> > two most irritating voices in political talk radio
> > back-to-back.
> > Great.
>
> and grating :)
> >
>
and nauseating:)
 
Re: Why is $60,000 or even less so terrible for a nighttime talk-show host?

> > >>
> > > Gold's a proven loser in DFW market. Poor performance
> > again
> > > and again. He'd take whatever they gave him, they knew
> > that
> > > better than we do.
> > Your logic is flawed. If Gold is a "proven loser",then why
>
> > was he asked many times over to substitute for Mark, and
> > other prominent local talkers across the country? What
> were
> > his numbers again at KLIF 20 years ago? What were they in
> > the 90's? mmmmmm.. They were not slouchy. He made a goof
> in
> > going to work at 990, and was promised alot along with
> > others who worked there. He was taken like the others as
> > well. David writes a lot of guest columns and is in
> demand.
> > I am not fan of his by any means,but his track record is
> not
> > all that bad.
> >
> He's a retread's retread. You're joking, right?
>
Dude. If he's that bad why is he asked to sit in a lot as ed pointed out? Why was he hired? Why is he still in the business,if he is that bad? Benito Mussolini,if he were still alive, would get hired there.
 
Re: Why is $60,000 or even less so terrible for a nighttime talk-show host?

> > > > Gold's a proven loser in DFW market. Poor performance
> > > again
> > > > and again. He'd take whatever they gave him, they knew
>
> > > that
> > > > better than we do.
> > > Your logic is flawed. If Gold is a "proven loser",then
> why
> >
> > > was he asked many times over to substitute for Mark,
> and
> > > other prominent local talkers across the country? What
> > were
> > > his numbers again at KLIF 20 years ago? What were they
> in
> > > the 90's? mmmmmm.. They were not slouchy. He made a goof
>
> > in
> > > going to work at 990, and was promised alot along with
> > > others who worked there. He was taken like the others as
>
> > > well. David writes a lot of guest columns and is in
> > demand.
> > > I am not fan of his by any means,but his track record is
>
> > not
> > > all that bad.
> > >
> > He's a retread's retread. You're joking, right?
> >
> Dude. If he's that bad why is he asked to sit in a lot as ed
> pointed out? Why was he hired? Why is he still in the
> business,if he is that bad? Benito Mussolini,if he were
> still alive, would get hired there.


Don't need Benito ... WBAP has its two right-wing fascists already.
 
Re: Why is $60,000 or even less so terrible for a nighttime talk-show host?

> > >
> > He's a retread's retread. You're joking, right?
> >
> Dude. If he's that bad why is he asked to sit in a lot as ed
> pointed out? Why was he hired? Why is he still in the
> business,if he is that bad? Benito Mussolini,if he were
> still alive, would get hired there.
>
You checked ABC O&O talk ratings across America lately? Down, down, down due to bad calls.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom