• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

WBXY heard on 93.3 today

Well, there is one more interesting twist here. I believe that w227AV is licensed as a non-commercial translator. It's illegal to use a non-com translator to rebroadcast commercial stations and I do not know if a non-com translator can be converted into a commercial one or not. Anyone else know the answer to that?
 
Kmagrill said:
I do not know if a non-com translator can be converted into a commercial one or not.

As long as the translator is operating within the commercial FM band (92.1mhz - 107.9mhz) I believe the license can be re-desiganted as a commercial translator under certain conditions; namely a non-com band translator (88.1mhz - 91.9mhz) is available serving the same area. However, it should be noted that any non-commercial radio station may operate on the commercial band, whether said frequency is licensed as a non-commercial frequency, or not. This is not true, as all are very well aware, with a commercial station operating on any reserved non-commercial frequency.

Ex: WUFT-FM may operate on a translator on 107.9 or may move the entire operation to 103.7 without having 103.7 license status changed to non-commercial. However, WRUF-FM commercial operation would not be authorized to operate as a commercial station on 89.1 or any translator frequency within the 88.1mhz to 91.9mhz reserved band. I realize most everyone reading this is aware of the rules, but I am using this example for illustrative purposes.
 
I posed the question about converting non-com translators into commercial ones to someone with more experience than I and his response was: "As long as it is not in the reserved band, yes--as often and as easily as some folks change their underwear (twice a week?)".

The main difference between the two, when operating on the non-reserved part of the band is that non-com licenses pay no regulatory fees, while commercial ones do. This puts non-com applications at risk during filing windows because non-coms cannot pay auction fees either. So, they only acquire channels when no commercial interests are concerned. However, once a translator is granted, converting is as easy as filling out a form and paying the fees. BTW, there's no fee refund if you pay for a commercial license and then take it non-com later. There's also no requirement for a substitute non-com translator to exist in the area.

Though not part of this discussion, one other minor difference exists between reserved band translators and those operating on the non-reserved band. Those in the reserved band (88-92mHz) can be fed by satellite or any other means whereas those on the non-reserved band must be fed from an off-the-air source regardless of their commercial or non-com status.
 
Kmagrill said:
I posed the question about converting non-com translators into commercial ones to someone with more experience than I and his response was: "As long as it is not in the reserved band, yes--as often and as easily as some folks change their underwear (twice a week?)".

Perhaps I'm a little thick headed this morning, but I'm not quite sure I understand the above referenced question?
 
jmtillery said:
Perhaps I'm a little thick headed this morning, but I'm not quite sure I understand the above referenced question?


Translators can be freely converted from non-coms into commercial. There's no need to provide another non-com to take the place of one that is being converted. The reference to twice a week refers to the fact that some translator operators seem to change their facility's status about that often.
 
Kmagrill said:
jmtillery said:
Perhaps I'm a little thick headed this morning, but I'm not quite sure I understand the above referenced question?


Translators can be freely converted from non-coms into commercial. There's no need to provide another non-com to take the place of one that is being converted. The reference to twice a week refers to the fact that some translator operators seem to change their facility's status about that often.

Thank you for the clarification. I told I was thick headed yesterday morning :)
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom