• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

WCBS-FM en Espanol????

The same can be said for you. Listeners do think out of the box, as a matter of fact, the trend if for more listener control over content. Be that thru personal media players or the illusion of more control (thru the choices on sattelite radio), the push is outside the box, even though you don't seem to see it.

I'm 17 years in the business at 32 and I've seen your types bounce from station to station looking for steady work. A few good books and then disaster and you're off to somewhere else. Many programmers are like journeyman pitchers... therev are good ones (the Roger Clemens etc) and they are usually in place for many years (Jim Ryan at Lite FM, Joe McCoy at CBS-FM, Mark Mason WINS) and have successful runs, know the pulse of the audience they want, know the market and can deliver for audience AND client and usually grew and started in radio in the area.

And then there are the clueless, who have an idea about one side of the coin and assume that the other is the same everywhere. No amount of research can surpass life experience tied to a market and those are the people who usually rent, since they are not here long enough to buy.

I'm not pretending to know anything about LA, I have never been there. We were talking about missing formats in New York City, you made a statement that there aren't any gaps in English based formats. Incorrect, and if you KNEW the dynamics of the market, you would know that.

You would know that a second AC could outperform (in revenue) a majority of signals on the FM dial if programmed correctly. This would be my first choice. You would know previous attempts at AC formats failed because none had focus or direction and were constantly reworked. Lite FM is successful because of 20+ years of very careful changes that were not made "all at once". There were no knee-jerk reactions to a bad book, there may have been subtle changes leading to an eventual change, but nothing earth shattering. The Lite FM of today is very different but has passed the torch carefully. Regardless, when one looks at its billing, you wonder why another station has not come along to at least try and take some of that. Yes, it is a huge brand, but the financial payoff to at least try something is huge. The idea is to get the right people in place to do it.

Gold AC stations also do well if carefully programmed and here is the potential to have a gold based format (lite hits 70's/80's/90's) like Sunny 104.5 in Philly (before they tinkered with it and now it's dipping) and Albany's Magic 100.9 in New York City that still attracts younger demos not served by other stations full time as well as attracting some older demos not being served by ANYONE. Lite FM had excellent response when they featured this on a weekend... so much so that they repeat it often. It doesn't belong on some HD2 channel, it belongs on someone's main channel. If the format is successful (I would bet on it), it could be tweaked to continue after younger people as the years pass. The idea would be not to make any abrupt changes. Again, the success of Lite FM has been slow yet meaningful changes. It doesn't feel like the Earth is moving, but it is. And again, it can't be any worse and has a good chance of being better than what it's replacing.

You would also know a Country FM signal could outperform some of the lower billers. The last Country station to leave had great suburban numbers and, at the time, made the right move to become WKTU (they had great numbers for a few years). 10 years later, NYC has a few stations that cater to audiences in the suburbs (WPLJ comes to mind right away) and does well doing that. In Philadelphia, Hartford and Albany, all surrounding NYC, you constantly have country stations that do well 12+ (in Albany, the country station is a monster). I think it would be a safer gamble than what has been happening and a more stable existance.

The backwards reality about demos is reality, the idea is to try and find holes and plug in formats. I just gave you three and you cannot deny (even though you will, since that will be admission that your opening statement was incorrect) that the three I mentioned may be better than what is currently on. If you do not agree, it shows your lack of knowledge of the NYC market.
 
The guy with the screen name of a dead AM said:
The same can be said for you. Listeners do think out of the box, as a matter of fact, the trend if for more listener control over content. Be that thru personal media players or the illusion of more control (thru the choices on sattelite radio), the push is outside the box, even though you don't seem to see it.

- The vast majority of listeners want familiarity, whether in music, source of news items or talk topics. Very few want large playlists, news form Burkina Faso or talk about neutrino research.

- I am guessing that you think all playlists are too short.

- The average iPod has 300 songs on it. The most popular XM channels are the most mainstream.

The guy with the screen name of a dead AM said:
I'm 17 years in the business at 32 and I've seen your types bounce from station to station looking for steady work. A few good books and then disaster and you're off to somewhere else. Many programmers are like journeyman pitchers... therev are good ones (the Roger Clemens etc) and they are usually in place for many years (Jim Ryan at Lite FM, Joe McCoy at CBS-FM, Mark Mason WINS) and have successful runs, know the pulse of the audience they want, know the market and can deliver for audience AND client and usually grew and started in radio in the area.

- How totally ignorant of you. I've been with the same group for 12 years. My job is to create new concepts, keep the old ones on track and to fix the occasional disaster. My biggest successes have been long running and none in a place I grew up (20 years #1 in Puerto Rico... the longest running #1 top 50 market FM in America ever)

The guy with the screen name of a dead AM said:
And then there are the clueless, who have an idea about one side of the coin and assume that the other is the same everywhere. No amount of research can surpass life experience tied to a market and those are the people who usually rent, since they are not here long enough to buy.

- Hmm. I am not from Puerto Rico, but I managed or programmed the #1 station for 24 of the last 36 years there. I am not from Argentina, but I created and kept a station #1 for 4 years with the hemisphere's highest cume and a format that I created. I am not from Ecuador, but I had top stations in a half dozen markets, did the first Top 40 in South America, etc. I could go on to LA, Miami, Dominican Republic, Peru, Mexico, Phoenix, Karachi,etc. A good programmer needs to research (who said going out on the street, to record stores, to the parks, to shopping cneters is not research?) but in the end, it is the ability to analyze the market, not the growing up in it, that matters.


The guy with the screen name of a dead AM said:
I'm not pretending to know anything about LA, I have never been there. We were talking about missing formats in New York City, you made a statement that there aren't any gaps in English based formats. Incorrect, and if you KNEW the dynamics of the market, you would know that.

- There are no gaps that can be profitable. AC exists, so fragging an existing station is not an indication of a "missing format." Oldies is too lod for buyers. Country: asked and answered.

The guy with the screen name of a dead AM said:
You would know that a second AC could outperform (in revenue) a majority of signals on the FM dial if programmed correctly. This would be my first choice. You would know previous attempts at AC formats failed because none had focus or direction and were constantly reworked. Lite FM is successful because of 20+ years of very careful changes that were not made "all at once". There were no knee-jerk reactions to a bad book, there may have been subtle changes leading to an eventual change, but nothing earth shattering. The Lite FM of today is very different but has passed the torch carefully. Regardless, when one looks at its billing, you wonder why another station has not come along to at least try and take some of that. Yes, it is a huge brand, but the financial payoff to at least try something is huge. The idea is to get the right people in place to do it.

- AC is not a missing format. It already exists. And, generally, in radio frontal battles are expensive and the established owner of the hill more than likely wins, and the loser loses money.

The guy with the screen name of a dead AM said:
Gold AC stations also do well if carefully programmed and here is the potential to have a gold based format (lite hits 70's/80's/90's) like Sunny 104.5 in Philly (before they tinkered with it and now it's dipping) and Albany's Magic 100.9 in New York City that still attracts younger demos not served by other stations full time as well as attracting some older demos not being served by ANYONE. Lite FM had excellent response when they featured this on a weekend... so much so that they repeat it often. It doesn't belong on some HD2 channel, it belongs on someone's main channel. If the format is successful (I would bet on it), it could be tweaked to continue after younger people as the years pass. The idea would be not to make any abrupt changes. Again, the success of Lite FM has been slow yet meaningful changes. It doesn't feel like the Earth is moving, but it is. And again, it can't be any worse and has a good chance of being better than what it's replacing.

-- You are painting as a missing format one that exists. Huh?

The guy with the screen name of a dead AM said:
You would also know a Country FM signal could outperform some of the lower billers. The last Country station to leave had great suburban numbers and, at the time, made the right move to become WKTU (they had great numbers for a few years). 10 years later, NYC has a few stations that cater to audiences in the suburbs (WPLJ comes to mind right away) and does well doing that. In Philadelphia, Hartford and Albany, all surrounding NYC, you constantly have country stations that do well 12+ (in Albany, the country station is a monster). I think it would be a safer gamble than what has been happening and a more stable existance.

- Were that so, it would be tried. There has been a net loss of country staitons in large metros in the last decade as the format settles back to the pre-early-90's peak era.

- Albany is not NY. Albany ha a very low ethnic component. NY is one of the most ethnic places in the US.


The guy with the screen name of a dead AM said:
The backwards reality about demos is reality, the idea is to try and find holes and plug in formats. I just gave you three and you cannot deny (even though you will, since that will be admission that your opening statement was incorrect) that the three I mentioned may be better than what is currently on. If you do not agree, it shows your lack of knowledge of the NYC market.

- Country. tried over and over. Format not in a peak success period, anyway.

- Oldies. 55+ and advertisers in transactional markets don't buy 55+.

- AC. Format exists. Not a "missing format" no matter how much you try to say it.
 
- The vast majority of listeners want familiarity, whether in music, source of news items or talk topics. Very few want large playlists, news form Burkina Faso or talk about neutrino research.

When did we talk about familiarity of music? Is this all you know?

- I am guessing that you think all playlists are too short.

Yes.

- The average iPod has 300 songs on it. The most popular XM channels are the most mainstream.

And you found this number where?

The guy with the screen name of a dead AM said:
I'm 17 years in the business at 32 and I've seen your types bounce from station to station looking for steady work. A few good books and then disaster and you're off to somewhere else. Many programmers are like journeyman pitchers... therev are good ones (the Roger Clemens etc) and they are usually in place for many years (Jim Ryan at Lite FM, Joe McCoy at CBS-FM, Mark Mason WINS) and have successful runs, know the pulse of the audience they want, know the market and can deliver for audience AND client and usually grew and started in radio in the area.

- How totally ignorant of you.

I must have struck a nerve...

The man who compares English based oldies formats with Spanish based oldies formats said:

- I've been with the same group for 12 years.

I am sure you are helping them develop new methods of content delivery, aren't you? Seems like you're stuck in an old way of thinking.

- My job is to create new concepts, keep the old ones on track

How dinosauric. I don't think I've ever heard THAT from a consultant before.

- There are no gaps that can be profitable. AC exists, so fragging an existing station is not an indication of a "missing format."

Yes it is, if you can bill at least half of Lite FM (30+ million) you've billed better than many FM's in the market. Done.

Mr EDUARDO said

-Oldies is too lod for buyers.

Not oldies, Gold AC... Oldest record maybe 1975, whith the exception of "Unchained Melody" and "Brown Eyed Girl". But you knew that from your dialed out research.

- Country: asked and answered.

And again, you miss the point.

- AC is not a missing format. It already exists.

See above.

- And, generally, in radio frontal battles are expensive and the established owner of the hill more than likely wins, and the loser loses money.

Yet we have 3 FM's in New York competing for the same 18-34 female demo. Never happens.

-- You are painting as a missing format one that exists. Huh?

Again, see above.

- Were that so, it would be tried. There has been a net loss of country staitons in large metros in the last decade as the format settles back to the pre-early-90's peak era.

WUSN-FM Chicago
KSCS-FM Dallas
WXTU-FM Philadelphia
WMZQ-FM Washington
WKLB-FM Boston

I know.... small markets. You're right!

- Oldies. 55+ and advertisers in transactional markets don't buy 55+.

See above

- AC. Format exists. Not a "missing format" no matter how much you try to say it.

See above
 
The dead AM tribute poster said:
- The vast majority of listeners want familiarity, whether in music, source of news items or talk topics. Very few want large playlists, news form Burkina Faso or talk about neutrino research.

When did we talk about familiarity of music? Is this all you know?

-> You were suggesting out of the box, different things. Different means unfamiliar, in most cases. Different means long playlists, as one example. there is no real evidence any of these things is desired.

- I am guessing that you think all playlists are too short.

The dead AM tribute poster said:
Yes.

-> Playlists are as long as there are songs that the majority of partisans of a particular format like. In some formats, it is 80 songs. In others, it may be many hundreds. A few hours ago, I implemented a music test where there were over 1000 acceptable songs that scored high and had very few negs with any listener group.

-> In other words, each format has a usable library. Going over it drives listeners away. Most of us who program have at least once made th emistake of putting too many songs on the air... and seeing the ratings collapse. Now, I wait for competitors to do it, and giggle.

- The average iPod has 300 songs on it. The most popular XM channels are the most mainstream.

The dead AM tribute poster said:
And you found this number where?

-> Several studies on theweb have referenced this in the last 6 months. I suppose a Google will find it. One was a fairly sizable project, done by Edison or Coleman or soeme company equally as reputable.

-> Our in house research supports this.

The guy with the screen name of a dead AM said:
I'm 17 years in the business at 32 and I've seen your types bounce from station to station looking for steady work. A few good books and then disaster and you're off to somewhere else. Many programmers are like journeyman pitchers... therev are good ones (the Roger Clemens etc) and they are usually in place for many years (Jim Ryan at Lite FM, Joe McCoy at CBS-FM, Mark Mason WINS) and have successful runs, know the pulse of the audience they want, know the market and can deliver for audience AND client and usually grew and started in radio in the area.

- How totally ignorant of you.

The dead AM tribute poster said:
I must have struck a nerve...
The man who compares English based oldies formats with Spanish based oldies formats said:
- I've been with the same group for 12 years.

-> Oldies are oldies. The language does not change the format. There are oldies stations all over the world, playing whatever the hits of the past were, in different genres. There are salsa oldies staitons in Puerto Rico. There are US Top 40 oldies stations in Ecuador. Old means the same thing in all languages. Oldies stations play non-current music. Period.

The dead AM tribute poster said:
I am sure you are helping them develop new methods of content delivery, aren't you? Seems like you're stuck in an old way of thinking.

-> Yep, like HD 2 fomrats. And other things that are proprietary. I have said for a decade that "radio" does not mean a tower in the marsh or an antenna on a hill. It means content broadcast to many people. When there is a good alternative, this is what we will do. We even tried doing 5 satellite channels for three years on XM!

- My job is to create new concepts, keep the old ones on track

The dead AM tribute poster said:
How dinosauric. I don't think I've ever heard THAT from a consultant before.

-> I am not, in this position, a consultant. I have line responsibility and you can look at the paragraph above for evidence.

- There are no gaps that can be profitable. AC exists, so fragging an existing station is not an indication of a "missing format."

The dead AM tribute poster said:
Yes it is, if you can bill at least half of Lite FM (30+ million) you've billed better than many FM's in the market. Done.

-> That is not a "missing format." That is copying elements of an existing one to frag it. NOT MISSING. NOT MISSING.

Mr EDUARDO said

-> Eduardo is not my last name. It is a given name, like Jean Pierre or José María. I also have tow last names, as well.

-Oldies is too old for buyers.

The dead AM tribute poster said:
Not oldies, Gold AC... Oldest record maybe 1975, whith the exception of "Unchained Melody" and "Brown Eyed Girl". But you knew that from your dialed out research.

-> you suggested three missing formats, AC, Oldies, Country. AC is not missing, oldies is too old, and country has been done before. Besides, both country and oldies are on HD 2's now.

- AC is not a missing format. It already exists.

The dead AM tribute poster said:
See above.

-> It is not a missing format. It is a successful format that might be fraggable, but at great cost. A Pyrrhic victory, probably.

- And, generally, in radio frontal battles are expensive and the established owner of the hill more than likely wins, and the loser loses money.


The dead AM tribute poster said:
Yet we have 3 FM's in New York competing for the same 18-34 female demo. Never happens.

-> There are a lot more than that going after 18-34 females, such as WCAA and WPAT, too. WHTZ, WWPR,, WQHT, WLTW, WBLS; WCAA, WSKQ, WPAT and WKTU at least all have very saleable 18-34 female numbers, with WRKS and WPLJ being at the fringe...

-- You are painting as a missing format one that exists. Huh?

The dead AM tribute poster said:
Again, see above.

-> AC exists. You are taling about brush strokes ont he canvas. There is an AC.

- Were that so, it would be tried. There has been a net loss of country staitons in large metros in the last decade as the format settles back to the pre-early-90's peak era.


The dead AM tribute poster said:
WUSN-FM Chicago
KSCS-FM Dallas
WXTU-FM Philadelphia
WMZQ-FM Washington
WKLB-FM Boston

-> Nearly every core country market has lost one or more country stations in the last decade. The ones that were alone, such as all the ones you mention, are way down in shares. As one example, WUSN was a 5 share 25-54 station in the mid-90's, and is a low three share station now. Same for KSCS. Over a 6 share 25-54 in mid-90s, and now a mid to low 3-share range.

The dead AM tribute poster said:
I know.... small markets. You're right!

-> I said there has been a net loss of country stations. And there has been. And the ratings are lower than in the past.

- Oldies. 55+ and advertisers in transactional markets don't buy 55+.

The dead AM tribute poster said:
See above

-> You can not get agencies to buy what the advertisers does not specify. There is no sustainable 55+ radio business.
 
OK.. will you two knuckleheads stop the little personal barbs and stay on topic?

Here's the real deal.... while we're arguing which MUSIC format may or may not fill a hole, here's a sobering thought.... it may be that radio, as we know it, may be largely dead as a medium for purely delivering music to the end user. Back in the day, you had two options if you wanted to listen to hit music... AM radio or buy the records. Today, we have so many more options. If a radio station cuts back to, say, ten minutes of spots per hour so they can do seventeen songs in a row, a satellite channel can do no spots per hour and a gazillion songs in a row. They win THAT battle.

I have an mp3 player in my car. When I want music, I'll listen to that a lot because even the stations with the deep playlists don't have what I have.... 1500 or so songs that I picked myself because I like them. I also have the option of pushing the "next" button, so if I'm not particdularly in the mood for what comes up, I can move on.

Radio weathered a big crisis in the 50's when dramas, soap operas, comedies, etc. moved to a new medium, television. It re-invented itself then and is going to have to again. The radio stations that are successful in the future will be the ones that realize that they are in SHOW business.... not the music delivery business. Yes, music on radio will survive, but it will be the entertainment component that will drive the bus. Radio will have to stop relying on the quick fixes, like "Jack", ten-in-a-row, etc. and deliver real go-to content. Where's Howard Stern when we need him now. (Oh yeah.....). The radio stations that can say (and prove by actual delivery) that if you don't listen today you're missing something great will win. Those that just rely on the traditional crutches will go the way of the Stegasaurus.

Unfortunately there is very little great radio out there. There are some occasional flashes of brilliance, but I can't think of one radio station today that is so great that I would go out of my way to listen to it. OK all you programming geniuses... is one of you up to the task of bringing America the next really great radio station?? I hope you're out there because I love this medium and I'd hate to see it die.
 
Actually, you hit the nail right on the head.

http://www.radio-info.com/smf/index.php/topic,40571.90.html

See my thread on this page. Radio must reinvent with new ways to deliver content and, in the future, it will not be done via traditional over-the-air methods.

As for Mr. Eduardo's post.

1) Oldies are not oldies and it is foolish to directly compare a particular Spanish based format to an English based format and vice versa. The age demo may be the same, but the ethnic backgrounds are too different because of the language barrier. You cannot directly translate success with a Spanish based oldies format and assume success with an English based format... unless you've actually done it and I am sure there are some who could master bpth.

2) Developing HD-2 is a band aid. HD-2 does not have the reach that is expected from an FM signal. The "killer app" is limited and there won't be enough interest in HD because broadcasters do not know how to promote it. There is no plan to spend more than subsistence sums on investments in HD radio programming. As for the HD radios themselves, there is no guarantee that these radios will be offered by the automakers because they want to provide only what their customers want, and audience based demand is so far lacking. Nor are they looking to add expense unless they're confident that expense can help move cars.

http://www.hear2.com/

The article is right on the mark. HD is "bridge tech" (barely) that will hold radio (barely) in a "digital" domain until radio figures out what it's supposed to be doing and how it's supposed to and going to HAVE TO deliver content in a tech advancing world. Radio needs to get OFF the tradional 88-108/540-1700 dial. Content delivery is outside these bounds and radio needs to catch up.

Couple that with the fact that no new major tech for the listeners side of radio has been successfully introduced in the last 40+ Years (the last being FM stereo). Quad, AM Stereo, FMX, RDS... all have been either lukewarm at best... or wrought with such turmoil that they never got off the ground. How has the HD rollout been any better? It hasn't. It is wrought with turmoil, poorly promoted and incorrectly promoted (nobody understands what the hell HD stands for... a radio on display at a Tweeter in Mass in the center of the store could not offer one HD signal). HD radio is at least 5 years behind the curve and falling further behind each day.

3) As for the missing AC format, let's instead call in a wasted revenue opportunity, because that is what it is. Feel better? And since when did broadcasters all of the sudden feel paranoid about stealing some thunder?

4) In NYC, a low 3 is hearalded they way numbers are spun. There are some 2's that are looked upon as the second coming.



SonoSational18 said:
OK.. will you two knuckleheads stop the little personal barbs and stay on topic?

Here's the real deal.... while we're arguing which MUSIC format may or may not fill a hole, here's a sobering thought.... it may be that radio, as we know it, may be largely dead as a medium for purely delivering music to the end user. Back in the day, you had two options if you wanted to listen to hit music... AM radio or buy the records. Today, we have so many more options. If a radio station cuts back to, say, ten minutes of spots per hour so they can do seventeen songs in a row, a satellite channel can do no spots per hour and a gazillion songs in a row. They win THAT battle.

I have an mp3 player in my car. When I want music, I'll listen to that a lot because even the stations with the deep playlists don't have what I have.... 1500 or so songs that I picked myself because I like them. I also have the option of pushing the "next" button, so if I'm not particdularly in the mood for what comes up, I can move on.

Radio weathered a big crisis in the 50's when dramas, soap operas, comedies, etc. moved to a new medium, television. It re-invented itself then and is going to have to again. The radio stations that are successful in the future will be the ones that realize that they are in SHOW business.... not the music delivery business. Yes, music on radio will survive, but it will be the entertainment component that will drive the bus. Radio will have to stop relying on the quick fixes, like "Jack", ten-in-a-row, etc. and deliver real go-to content. Where's Howard Stern when we need him now. (Oh yeah.....). The radio stations that can say (and prove by actual delivery) that if you don't listen today you're missing something great will win. Those that just rely on the traditional crutches will go the way of the Stegasaurus.

Unfortunately there is very little great radio out there. There are some occasional flashes of brilliance, but I can't think of one radio station today that is so great that I would go out of my way to listen to it. OK all you programming geniuses... is one of you up to the task of bringing America the next really great radio station?? I hope you're out there because I love this medium and I'd hate to see it die.
 
I'd recommend going back to oldies.

DavidEduardo said:
XCountry285 said:
We already have spanish stations. We should get country or rock or at least alternative or something...something good....

There are missing viable spanish formats. There are not missing viable English ones.

Hmmmm.... What is the principal language in the market?

73s
 
I think we should move on from this Topic, since it was pure speculation to begin with. We all know that David thinks Spanish is the answer to a lot of problems. Ok, great, it works for him, he makes money with it, fine.

On the other hand, it's WCBS FM , so I don't want it to go Spanish. Just doesn't feel right. And, I think the flip to Jack just bugged too many people. So they should move to "Classic Hits" at least for now, imho.

Either way, its a speculation, with no confirmation. And this topic is getting nasty.
So let's move on, ok?

954 said:
I'd recommend going back to oldies.

DavidEduardo said:
XCountry285 said:
We already have spanish stations. We should get country or rock or at least alternative or something...something good....

There are missing viable spanish formats. There are not missing viable English ones.

Hmmmm.... What is the principal language in the market?

73s
 
Look at the billing for wpat and wcaa last year, nuff said.
 
Herb999 said:
Look at the billing for wpat and wcaa last year, nuff said.

I don't care if they make more money than Donald Trump, I don't wan't see Spanish on WCBS FM, I'd rather they stay JACK if that's the choice.

Of course, it's not up to me...
 
U sed:
As for Mr. Eduardo's post.

-> were my name Jean Pierre, would you call me Mr Pierre? Or were I a Billy Bob, would you call me "Mr. Bob?" Of course, if you were Frank Ed, I would call you Mr. Ed.

U sed:
1) Oldies are not oldies and it is foolish to directly compare a particular Spanish based format to an English based format and vice versa. The age demo may be the same, but the ethnic backgrounds are too different because of the language barrier. You cannot directly translate success with a Spanish based oldies format and assume success with an English based format... unless you've actually done it and I am sure there are some who could master bpth.

Only a monolingual would say that. English or Spanish or French are languages. Oldies is a format, not a language. Oldies appeals to a mix of nostalgia, memories and familiarity. It does not matter if an oldies station is in Farsi or Xosa, it is still an oldies staiton. To think that the term only applies to English language oldies stations is a bit of cultural jingoism and harkens back to the ugly American era...

U sed:
2) Developing HD-2 is a band aid.

-> The PC was a band aid for faster and smaller PCs. Everything in technology is a band-aid. Technology moves so fast that we can not look at it the way you are. HD is a good solution for today, but at the rate technology is moving, no solution will be valid for long.

U sed:
HD-2 does not have the reach that is expected from an FM signal.

-> It pretty much reaches as far as the usable and used FM signal contour, which is the 64 dbu. 95% of listening in diaries is in that contour.

U sed:
3) As for the missing AC format, let's instead call in a wasted revenue opportunity, because that is what it is. Feel better? And since when did broadcasters all of the sudden feel paranoid about stealing some thunder?

-> You assume Lite can be dinged. That is not a safe assumption. Look at B-100 in Philly.

U sed:
4) In NYC, a low 3 is hearalded they way numbers are spun. There are some 2's that are looked upon as the second coming.

-> Those are 12+. Not important. WFAN is the #15 12+ station, yet top 3 in billing.

]
 
Only a monolingual would say that. English or Spanish or French are languages.

And how many monolinguals use radio? Fin.


U sed:
2) Developing HD-2 is a band aid.

-> The PC was a band aid for faster and smaller PCs. Everything in technology is a band-aid. Technology moves so fast that we can not look at it the way you are. HD is a good solution for today, but at the rate technology is moving, no solution will be valid for long.

Finally, we agree (except that I would stop before saying HD is a "solution" for anything).

U sed:
HD-2 does not have the reach that is expected from an FM signal.

-> It pretty much reaches as far as the usable and used FM signal contour, which is the 64 dbu. 95% of listening in diaries is in that contour.

Not far enough, not when you're in super metros like LA and New York. Under even the best conditions, HD2 signals travel only to very western Nassau County in the car. When you consider that the HD 1 and analog channel have another 40-50 miles of useage....

-> You assume Lite can be dinged. That is not a safe assumption. Look at B-100 in Philly.

Lite FM is very mainstream and you could argue flirting with Hot-AC. They are allowed to wander like this because they have no direct competition. If a group comes in the edges gold AC (70's 80's 90's), and with a more laid back sound, I think they eat away. If you can bill 40% of what Lite FM bills, you've done a good job in what is still a very desired demo and there is no reason why you couldn't. You could also bank on Lite possability shedding some listeners as they would probably start to adjust once they had very direct competition.
 
wgliradio said:
Only a monolingual would say that. English or Spanish or French are languages.

And how many monolinguals use radio? Fin.

->> Oldies is a format. It can be done in any language on earth that has associated music and radio stations.
.

-> It pretty much reaches as far as the usable and used FM signal contour, which is the 64 dbu. 95% of listening in diaries is in that contour.

Not far enough, not when you're in super metros like LA and New York. Under even the best conditions, HD2 signals travel only to very western Nassau County in the car. When you consider that the HD 1 and analog channel have another 40-50 miles of useage....

95% of the AQH listening to FMs is done inside the 64 dbu contour, averaged from maret to market, all over the place. If you look at WHERE in Nassau the NYC staitons are listened to, it is right up to the 64, and then it drops off madly.

-> You assume Lite can be dinged. That is not a safe assumption. Look at B-100 in Philly.

Lite FM is very mainstream and you could argue flirting with Hot-AC.

-> Oh, WPLJ.

They are allowed to wander like this because they have no direct competition. If a group comes in the edges gold AC (70's 80's 90's), and with a more laid back sound, I think they eat away. If you can bill 40% of what Lite FM bills, you've done a good job in what is still a very desired demo and there is no reason why you couldn't. You could also bank on Lite possability shedding some listeners as they would probably start to adjust once they had very direct competition.

--> The hardest battle in marketing is the direct assault. I think CBS knows this, and would be willing to have unique formats as opposed to having a station known as a bad copy of Lite. That is what CCU got in Philly.
 
It hard to relate listener experiences across those lines, there are different cultures. It is really too difficult... so much so that the ratings are weighed differently, as you referred to in another post on another board.

As for PLJ, they flirted with a Jack-esque format before CBS-FM flipped and have way to hard an edge to be considered a mainstream AC. You could argue they are Hot AC, but they are on another planet compared to Lite FM. As I said in a previous post, PLJ caters to suburban listeners... especially New Jersey. You would think you're listening to a station from Trenton and if you had a dime for every Jersey mention.... Lots of Springsteen, Dave Matthews, Nickleback, Coldplay, Fallout Boy, Bon Jovi, Switchfoot.
 
wgliradio said:
It hard to relate listener experiences across those lines, there are different cultures. It is really too difficult... so much so that the ratings are weighed differently, as you referred to in another post on another board.

As for PLJ, they flirted with a Jack-esque format before CBS-FM flipped and have way to hard an edge to be considered a mainstream AC. You could argue they are Hot AC, but they are on another planet compared to Lite FM. As I said in a previous post, PLJ caters to suburban listeners... especially New Jersey. You would think you're listening to a station from Trenton and if you had a dime for every Jersey mention.... Lots of Springsteen, Dave Matthews, Nickleback, Coldplay, Fallout Boy, Bon Jovi, Switchfoot.

Oldies means music and mood attached to memories and life experiences. All cultures have memories. Oldies is a format in any language.

The ratings are not weighted any differently between non-Hispanic whites and Hispanics than they use for men and women or different demos. Arbitron has what are called stratification variables. Each variable stands for a specific group that is quantifiable, such as 18-34 Black Men, or residents of Jones County in the Metro. Every one of the variables becomes a proportional quota in the sample. If one variable is 12% of the populaiton, then 12% of the diaries should come from it.

Hispanics are sampled in proportion to the percentage of Hispanics in the market. If the market is 23% Hispanic, 23% of diaries will be Hispanic. Arbitron, since January, also divides Hsiapnics into English and SPanish dominant, with a percentage of the Hispanic sample in each variable.

So, a 42 year old Black Male in Jones County will be sampled as part of the male quota, the 35-44 quota for Blacks, and for the county quota. The same procedure applies to Hispanics. If one person out of every 1000 is sampled, every single diary will represent about 1000 equal people insofar as demos and ethnicity. It is one person = one vote and there is no overweighting or oversampling of Hispanics or anyone else.

WPLJ is still, whatever they play, an AC station. It is one of an array of alternatives for AC, not all of which work in every market.
 
All I can add is that I was in the NY area last week and the radio was pretty disappointing. If it weren't for a couple of suburban signals and my mp3 player I'd have nothing to listen to at all. Sad!!!!
 
YIKES! If they got rid of CBS-FM what would geniuses like Brian Thomas and Gay Boy Greg do?
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom