jakej said:
What questions are coming up? What the heck are you talking about?
Not going to call any person out in public, that's against my principles...
but, there have been some key people, spread over a lot of the project, whose actions now seem a little questionable, at best. This is not just a single individual, there are at least 4 that I am aware of, who seem to have advised, taken actions, individually and collectively, that have shaped this project. From where I, and others sit, there are questions to be asked, those questions won't be that easy for them to answer.
I can understand judgement calls, I make them everyday, but my judgement calls are fair to all parties involved. I have been open with Simply Living, and Bexley, and clearly stated when an opinion was mine, or the groups I represent. I personally will advise people fairly, and clearly with the topics I am asked about.
But I won't mislead people, so they believe they can do things, or simply because that is what I want them to because I want something. It's wrong to put people and organizations at risk because of ones personal desires. That seems to be the case here, the expanded hours seem to be a perfect example. The reconsideration another, it most likely did more damage than good for WCRS.
Being a spoiled brat isn't always good. Spoiled brats don't always prosper. Threats and innuendo play out, so It's time to get past this, before it really gets bad.
