• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

WGBH-FM/WZBC

LA_Guy said:
Just look at how Tufts University's WMFO (equidistant on the other side of WBUR) fared. They didn't have Ed Perry to play hardball for them, and wound up with a highly directional 100 watt signal thay many (including me) believe is inferior to their (original) ten watt signal.

I just looked at WMFO's pattern. Over and arc of nearly 120 degrees to the west, the signal is equivalent to 10W or less at 41' AAT and due west, it is equivalent to only 1.5W! I live on the Arlington-Lexington line. Not sure of the distance to WMFO, but it's no wonder that I have such a tough time picking up the station.
 
DanStrassberg said:
LA_Guy said:
Just look at how Tufts University's WMFO (equidistant on the other side of WBUR) fared. They didn't have Ed Perry to play hardball for them, and wound up with a highly directional 100 watt signal thay many (including me) believe is inferior to their (original) ten watt signal.

I just looked at WMFO's pattern. Over and arc of nearly 120 degrees to the west, the signal is equivalent to 10W or less at 41' AAT and due west, it is equivalent to only 1.5W! I live on the Arlington-Lexington line. Not sure of the distance to WMFO, but it's no wonder that I have such a tough time picking up the station.

No doubt about it. WMFO had a better signal in the old Class D days. But, in order to survive the potential "sudden death syndrome" brought on by the greedy NPR, CPB and the Public Radio folks back in 1978 (either you upgrade to at least 100 watts or be bumped or worse), they had to sacrifice some of their coverage for the greater good. 91.5 is a very congested piece of spectrum in the Boston area, namely WMLN, WMFO, WBIM-FM, WUML and more. For the most part, they avoided the "grim reaper". Good thing too. And the folks on 91.7 (WRBB and WBRS) were able to stave off the "repo man" by moving to the commercial band and are still operating to this day. WMFO was able to increase to 100 watts, directional in Stereo. In its' day, 'MFO was quite a station in its' own right. Those 40 watts, non-directional, covered a lot of real estate. As a high school student in Randolph back in 70's, I would hear 'MFO come in like a local after the other 91.5's would sign-off for the night. It had a better signal than some of the 100 watters we have today.
 
Personally WMFO has been a thorn in my side since 1976, when I arrived at WLTI.

The place is poorly run, leaving the transmitter on for days at a time with nothing but dead air

The high point of my weekend was leaving the WLYN/WAZN studios Saturday afternoon (we are in Woburn) and hearing WUML loud and clear within 5 miles of the WMFO stick.

Now that the statute of limitations has run out I will confess to running WJUL a tad over power on Saturday nights back in the days when I did air shifts there to get signal inside of 128... oops

And U Mass needed that Marshfield allocation as much as they needed the old WPAA 91.7 Andover one. They make the religious broadcasters who apply for every frequency in the spectrum look respectable.
 
WMFO is actually 125 watts ERP, but that hardly matters in terms of real-world listening, of course. WMFO also really shot themselves in the foot by applying for their Class D-to-Class A upgrade by using an "off the shelf" directional antenna pattern. It was simpler to do, no doubt, but they really kinda shafted themselves for the future. And yeah, the pattern is so directional it's vastly inferior to the old omni pattern from the Class D days...and, of course, back when the dial was a helluva lot less crowded. 10 watts will go a long way when there's nothing else on the frequency. Still, WMFO comes in great in Chelsea, Revere and Saugus. :)

However, it beats being a grandfathered Class D! Look how much WRBB gets smacked around by WBOQ, and how badly WBRS got hosed when WWFX moved their transmitter site, and how WZLY's signal barely makes it off-campus. I'm glad those stations managed to stay around, but at what a price...

The place (WMFO) is poorly run, leaving the transmitter on for days at a time with nothing but dead air

No argument from me...I thought it was poorly run when I was one of the people running it! :) But the dead air thing should be fixed...after the FCC paid them a visit (2001 or 2002, I think) they finally came up with the money to pay their contract engineer to get the Burk VRC3000 (I think) installed and working. Still, I've been routinely amazed that Tufts doesn't just sell off the license. Between the high cost to operate it (compared to other student activity groups) and the wake of all the FCC NAL's, community member lawsuits, and other various issues that plagued the place in the late 1990's and early 2000's.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom