Re: WGST - The Changes Are Starting?
THANK YOU, Barbapapa. Finally, someone on this board who gets it! Rush is successful because he's entertaining, not because most of the country are right-wing extremists. Same with Savage. Do conservatives really believe he's so successful because he reflects the attitude of the people who listen to him? He's a MANIAC, and that's why people listen.
Franken, on the other hand is unsuccessful because he's not a good radio entertainer. No other reason.
Barbapapa said:ClarkKent said:"I've always been amazed that Rush Limbaugh didn't do better. You would think in the Atlanta market he would be strong but maybe Bill Maher is right, Americans are a lot more liberal (at least privately) than most people think."
The only reason Rush is on WGST is because he's syndicated by Premiere, which is in some form or fashion a part of Clear Channel itself. I've understood that the same thing has happened with his show in some other markets...getting stuck on smaller/lesser stations simply because CC owns them. Knowing that, I'm not convinced politics has much to do with it in this case, Art.
The fact that Rush doesn't do well in Atlanta has nothing to do with the political leanings of any listener, people listen to a show because they find it entertaining, not because the host is the same political bend. Look at all the fruitcakes who show up here spinning on their eyebrows because they hate the politics of a radio show host, hell, they're listeners!
THANK YOU, Barbapapa. Finally, someone on this board who gets it! Rush is successful because he's entertaining, not because most of the country are right-wing extremists. Same with Savage. Do conservatives really believe he's so successful because he reflects the attitude of the people who listen to him? He's a MANIAC, and that's why people listen.
Franken, on the other hand is unsuccessful because he's not a good radio entertainer. No other reason.