R
Radio1360
Guest
I've said it before on these posts and I'll say it again: All-News. Only this time a new station on a new frequency (AM of course) and not one owned by Clear Channel or Cumulus.
Radio1360 said:I've said it before on these posts and I'll say it again: All-News. Only this time a new station on a new frequency (AM of course) and not one owned by Clear Channel or Cumulus.
Windreader said:All News DOESN'T WORK... it's the most expensive format on the planet; it eats through people and resources at an unbelievable rate and has practically no audience retention. Nearly every station that tried it found it necessary to convert to "news/talk" to remain solvent.
DashRiprock said:An eclectic mix of every possible kind of music from punk to Pavarotti with bird calls on the half hour and Al Franken in the afternoon.
trusty said:Windreader said:All News DOESN'T WORK... it's the most expensive format on the planet; it eats through people and resources at an unbelievable rate and has practically no audience retention. Nearly every station that tried it found it necessary to convert to "news/talk" to remain solvent.
I'll take a wild guess that you're not consulting CBS Radio. ;D
Windreader said:trusty said:Windreader said:All News DOESN'T WORK... it's the most expensive format on the planet; it eats through people and resources at an unbelievable rate and has practically no audience retention. Nearly every station that tried it found it necessary to convert to "news/talk" to remain solvent.
I'll take a wild guess that you're not consulting CBS Radio. ;D
They probably wouldn't listen anyway. :CBS seems to have a penchant for looking backwards, or out the window (uh... Katie Couric... cough, cough) Aside from WINS, which averages a 3.5 share and 7-9th in the largest market in the country (they could probably run 24/7 intestinal noises up there and make money), there isn't much happening in the way of radio "news" formats. And certainly there isn't a single executive in the Atlanta market willing to invest the kind of money it would take to pull off anything close, which was the original question posed in this thread. We all know what happened when WCNN tried to do it on a shoestring. More than likely it would end up news in AM drive and a bunch of yakkers in all the other day parts... and, mediocre or not, Whiz-bee pretty much has a lock on that puppy.
"All news" had its narrow window of opportunity before CNN and the internet. Technology has just come too far. Radio's immediacy advantage is gone. The TV news channels can get to breaking stories anywhere in the world just as fast AND with video. Just about everyone I know carries a Blackberry and they get news alerts just as fast as the radio stations in a lot of cases. OK, WBBM and KCBS are holding their own, WTOP (not CBS) is a perennial winner in news-rich DC, but KFWB and KNX are both pulling one and a half shares. The CBS news/sports station in Dallas is buried among the losers, they have nothing in Houston. The CBS properties in Philly are news/TALK. Ditto Detroit and Boston. Forget Miami. Outside of markets 1-3 and Washington, "newsradio" doesn't really exist. I just don't see any upside to reviving the idea in Atlanta.
Anyway, my free counseling service for CBS... enjoy it where you have it, but all news radio is not exactly sweeping the country.
Okay, how about all-business, all day? And not just Bloomberg or WSJR (Wall Street Journal Report) until 10 a.m. That can't be expensive. Why? Because it's about money!!Windreader said:Radio1360 said:I've said it before on these posts and I'll say it again: All-News. Only this time a new station on a new frequency (AM of course) and not one owned by Clear Channel or Cumulus.
Can we just stop this nonsense? Every time I see one of these comments, I just shake my head and wonder if the poster has ever spent two minutes working in this business. All News DOESN'T WORK... it's the most expensive format on the planet; it eats through people and resources at an unbelievable rate and has practically no audience retention. Nearly every station that tried it found it necessary to convert to "news/talk" to remain solvent. A few attempted to do it on the cheap, with predictable results. All News is just not cost effective, and what could radio possibly deliver that CNN, Fox, etc. or the internet can't do better? Really, give it up.
Radio1360 said:Okay, how about all-business, all day? And not just Bloomberg or WSJR (Wall Street Journal Report) until 10 a.m. That can't be expensive. Why? Because it's about money!!
Windreader said:"Service".... I'd like to believe that word is still active in the vocabulary of a few radio executives.
Good, I heard it. And its programming is clock-formated, which I like (except for local business programs on weekends).louisNatl said:Radio1360 said:Okay, how about all-business, all day? And not just Bloomberg or WSJR (Wall Street Journal Report) until 10 a.m. That can't be expensive. Why? Because it's about money!!
Business radio is already available on 1160 AM
tcsnrayp said:Maybe someone here should try the "we're actually sticking to our format" format.
fortt3 said:"... you have an auto flambe' on the downtown Connector at Courtland and the ubiquitous ladder in the road on the 285 flyover loop to 85 North. Stay tuned for more on WATR-AM 750, Atlanta's only ALL TRAFFIC RADIO!"
[spot for Mister Sparky read by one of our famous traffic reporter voices]
"It's five-forty-seven, back to Atlanta's only real-time, full-time traffic, with more surface street coverage than any other station in the A-T-L. Denise, how are the back roads in Gwinnett?"