mcamp said:
Like everyone has said....there is plenty of great music, and hits that got lost in the shuffle.
"Classic Rock" radio has become a sort of history revisionist. Many bands and songs that were part of the "classic rock" era have all but been forgotten, many were very popular in their day. Then you have the argument of "what is classic rock?", for example, the band Chicago finds it way onto "oldies" stations, yet Billy Joel, Elton John are considered classic rock....and then you have a whole slew of bands that rarely find their way onto classic rock: Joe Jackson, Elvis Costello, The Ramones, yet they play The Clash, The Talking Heads, The Police, etc...who draws this line in the sand???? It is that damn line the is gumming up the works, and what's left is AC/DC, Led Zeppelin, The Eagles, and ZZ Top.
That is one thing I've always found incredibly WEIRD about "classic rock" stations - quite a few of the same ones that play Billy Joel/Elton John will also play Chicago, but typically just "25 Or 6 to 4" since it sounds the closest to "rock" than their other popular material. Airplay for The Ramones on such stations tends to be scattered, but if it's there, then it seems to ALWAYS be just two songs - "I Wanna Be Sedated" and "Blitzkrieg Bop" - and yeah Elvis Costello and Joe Jackson get practically NO airplay on such stations
The definition of "classic rock" is already blurry ENOUGH, but songs like "Smells Like Teen Spirit" are pushing 20 by now!! So I'm kinda surprised more classic rock stations haven't picked up on '90s material - many '90s stuff from OTHER media (books, TV shows, movies, etc.) have ALREADY faded into nostalgia! Yet rock can't seem to get beyond The Black Crowes and Guns 'N' Roses for what is considered "classic". I'd be curious to know what gets on the bandwagon for "classic rock" for the '90s/early '00s. Nirvana, as I mentioned, is kind of a shoe in IMO, as are Pearl Jam, Red Hot Chili Peppers, Smashing Pumpkins, Green Day, Offspring, Incubus, Foo Fighters, Stone Temple Pilots, Alice In Chains, Soundgarden, etc. But what of bands like Nine Inch Nails, Beastie Boys, Social Distortion, 311, Sublime, and Weezer?!? Though all 6 of those are and continue to be major players in the "alternative" markets, we gotta keep in mind that the music these bands are influenced by (ska, rap, punk, industrial) aren't typically included in "classic rock", whereas most grunge was heavily influenced by '70s rock (and Green Day and The Offspring are basically like another Clash, so IMO they also count for the "future" of "classic rock").
And then, the "B list" bands of '90s rock get even MORE confusing!!

The ones that take immediately after grunge (Bush, Seven Mary Three, Collective Soul, Silverchair, Candlebox, sometimes Soul Asylum) are shoe-ins for being considered "classic rock" - yet the inclusion of:
folk-rock based material (Counting Crows, Wallflowers, Dave Matthews Band)
the "post-hippie" jam bands (Blues Traveler, Big Head Todd and The Monsters, Spin Doctors)
"alternapop" with a SLIGHT influence of '70s rock (Third Eye Blind, Marcy Playground, Harvey Danger, Better than Ezra, Eve 6, Lit, Semisonic, New Radicals, Fastball, Gin Blossoms, MAYBE Barenaked Ladies)
women singer-songwriters (Sheryl Crow and Alanis Morissette being the most prominent, though there are others as well)
"alternapop" that derives more from ska/dance/jazz type music than it does from '70s rock (Smash Mouth, Sugar Ray, Len, No Doubt, Cake, early Beck, etc.)
British rockers (mostly Oasis and Radiohead, but Blur's "Song 2" also deserves a special mention)
and...ummmm...bands that just didn't FIT anywhere else, but were still popular (The Cranberries)
...are ALLLLL up for debate as to whether or not they'd be considered "classic rock" (and that's just the TIP of the iceberg!!!)