Okay, get your facts straight.
"Rodham" is Hillary's
maiden name, not her
middle name. She simply did not completely drop it after marrying like so many other career-oriented wives do. Her middle name is
"Diane". How often has Willie mentioned that? For that matter how many times has he mentioned McCain's middle name
"Sidney"? You know damn well he said "Hussein" because of the false Osama implication of the name. It's obvious in his tone and that is why McCain had no choice but to apologize for the comment since it was made at his rally.
As a radio talk show host it's his job to say things that are provacative and that is exactly what he did. I'm just surprised he is on a station owned by Bonneville, one of the nations most conservative companies. His support for McCain doesn't surprise me but his controversal comments seem over the top for a Bonneville property.
(And his immediate shift to supporting Clinton is just comical. After her making such a big deal in last night's debate about Farrakan supporting Obama and Obama's use of the word "denouce" instead of "reject", my first thought was "does she denounce or reject Willie's support?")
Arbitorn said:
At risk of getting this moved to "off the air," Willie said nothing racist. How many presidents can you go back without knowing them also by their middle name? Harry Truman didn't have a middle name so they had to give him the initial. As long as she's called Hillary Rodham, it is fair for him to be called Barack Hussein. This was a Republican event, not a national debate. It was a pep rally and Willie heated up the crowd as asked. McCain didn't approve for his own reasons, but Willie was only doing what he was put there to do. There is nothing racist in stating a man's given name. Its implications are not Willie's fault. The man has baggage with that name and it is wrong to be forced to ignore it and praise the emperor's new clothes.
The extention to this thread may be Willie's value to a new owner. Would Bonneville want that much of that kind of attention?