The ID is fairly simple, not much more than "WSTR-FM, Smyrna & WQXI-AM Atlanta," followed by a shotguy-style Star 94 jingle.
Thanks buddy! I STILL haven't heard it, despite my best efforts.
The ID is fairly simple, not much more than "WSTR-FM, Smyrna & WQXI-AM Atlanta," followed by a shotguy-style Star 94 jingle.
The ID is fairly simple, not much more than "WSTR-FM, Smyrna & WQXI-AM Atlanta," followed by a shotguy-style Star 94 jingle.
I believe there is a strong possibility that the 790 Frequency will be turned back in to the FCC. The land value of the tower location off Chesire Bridge Road is worth far more than the AM signal is worth. And building a new multiple tower Broadcasting site is way too expensive for an AM, the return on the investment is not likely feasible. If $$$ come in to play, I think this is a no brainier.
I am not sure the land the WQXI towers are sitting on is worth that much. It is a flood area. I am not sure the city would allow the land to be built up. There are already flood issues with Peachtree Creek and the WQXI land gives that water some place to go when we have major rains. Of course, the City sometimes does not make sense in it's decisions.[/QUOT.
I believe the land or portion of the land can be developed. Unless WQXI can piggyback on another site (which I believe would be difficult), and would probably involve moving the signal way out of the city at reduced power, there is no value unless you are a non-profit religious organization. AM radio is gone, no one under 40 even knows what AM Radio is. If it was your money, would you invest $$$ in a rebuild with very little projected revenue? I still think the only 2 options are 1) Selling the land and turning in the license, or 2) Selling the land and selling the 790 Frequency, (not tower site), to a religious non-profit who will move the tower site. There are big tax incentives for Entercom in this scenario.
Is "WQXI-AM" legal? For that matter, is "WSTR-FM" legal? Can you legally mention your service after your call letters if the service is not actually part of your call letters (as in WSB-FM)?
I am not sure the land the WQXI towers are sitting on is worth that much. It is a flood area. I am not sure the city would allow the land to be built up. There are already flood issues with Peachtree Creek and the WQXI land gives that water some place to go when we have major rains. Of course, the City sometimes does not make sense in it's decisions.[/QUOT.
I believe the land or portion of the land can be developed. Unless WQXI can piggyback on another site (which I believe would be difficult), and would probably involve moving the signal way out of the city at reduced power, there is no value unless you are a non-profit religious organization. AM radio is gone, no one under 40 even knows what AM Radio is. If it was your money, would you invest $$$ in a rebuild with very little projected revenue? I still think the only 2 options are 1) Selling the land and turning in the license, or 2) Selling the land and selling the 790 Frequency, (not tower site), to a religious non-profit who will move the tower site. There are big tax incentives for Entercom in this scenario.
It wouldn't be hard or expensive to move 790 to another one of the Cheshire Bridge towers. They could keep their existing omnidirectional day signal; the only bugaboo would be how much they would have to power down at night with an omnidirectional night signal. I'm no RF engineer but going to 400-500 watts omni from 1000W DA might do it (comparing 790 with 860 and 920).
Didn't 1690 have this issue when the city of Atlanta wanted to tear down their tower and do something else with the land the tower was on? They just piggybacked on another one of the Cheshire Bridge towers (don't remember which one).
The tower on the Lenox Rd side of that same land is used by 970, 1190 and 1600. It used to be owned by the Dickeys, but I'm not sure if it still is. It was the tower for 680 when they were a 25KW daytime station.
My mistake on the 94.1/790 ID. It does not say FM or AM.
IIRC 680 was just off Holcomb Bridge in the 1970's (where I think they still are):
https://www.google.com/maps/place/3...4.2631137,16.5z/data=!4m2!3m1!1s0x0:0x0?hl=en
I believe the current 790 site is the site they have used since the 1970's:
https://www.google.com/maps/place/3...611,17z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m2!3m1!1s0x0:0x0?hl=en
I would like to hear how the Dickeys ended up with this site. 790 was owned by and insurance / financial services companies Jefferson Pilot / Lincoln ) so selling assets for cash should not happen.
I don't think that's accurate. If TV station WEAK buys an AM station, that station becomes WEAK and the TV station becomes WEAK-TV. And if WSTR should decide to make the simulcast with 790 permanent and wanted both stations to have the same call letters, 94.1 would become WSTR-FM and 790 would become WSTR.
But I think it is accurate to put AM and FM in the legal I.D. if two stations are simulcasting and you're specifying which call letters are on the AM side and which are on the FM.
The Lenox Rd tower was definitely 680's site when they were a 25KW daytimer. They didn't have a directional antenna until they increased to 50KW, requiring the multiple towers at the Winters Chapel site. If you want to know when they moved, search the old Broadcasting Yearbooks on americanradiohistory.com.
IIRC 680 was just off Holcomb Bridge in the 1970's (where I think they still are):
https://www.google.com/maps/place/3...4.2631137,16.5z/data=!4m2!3m1!1s0x0:0x0?hl=en
I believe the current 790 site is the site they have used since the 1970's:
https://www.google.com/maps/place/3...611,17z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m2!3m1!1s0x0:0x0?hl=en
I would like to hear how the Dickeys ended up with this site. 790 was owned by and insurance / financial services companies Jefferson Pilot / Lincoln ) so selling assets for cash should not happen.
I did a quick search of the FCC site which is lacking on anything before electronic filing, unless the station has "cards" and WRNG had a CP in 1979 to move to the current site:
http://licensing.fcc.gov/cgi-bin/ws.exe/prod/cdbs/pubacc/prod/app_det.pl?Application_id=11325
click the PN link and you get this:
http://licensing.fcc.gov/cgi-bin/ws...plication_id=11325&File_number=BMP-19790605AJ
I was drove from East Cobb to Norcross once a week in 1980 (Via Holcomb Bridge road because 285 was mess up even then) and you could see the towers then.
I never paid much attention to 680 in the 1970's. I assume they were a daytimer before 80/90 and wisely figured out a directional night time service right after the rules loosen up. It is weird that a COL could be a place that does not exist any more. who to they "serve" with the one 5 or 6 AM Sunday public affairs program the FCC makes you do.