I agree with JohnnyK- so let me make a suggestion as to what would make ME listen more. First, there is some truth in "Nirvana killed the hairbands." But have you also considered that they didn't seem to kill Bon Jovi, Poison is celebrating its 20th anniversary, and Motley Crue has continued to be culturally relevant. It was always my belief that "Nirvana killed the hairbands" was something put out by Nirvana fans who tended to be rather downer people and liked NOTHING better than celebrating the demise of a band that was hard and fast and generally positive and happy. I could show you how in 1991 Kiss- a band that has copied every music fad that has happed since their inception in 1973, went from the "Heavens on Fire," "Uh All Night" and "Let's Put the X in Sex" songs of the eighties to the incredibly ROUGH "Unholy" in 1991. Pantera saw an audience for Metallica and Megadeath and realized they weren't going to make it in their original incarnation as a hair band but instead as hard metal. Take a look at a Pantera photo from 1988 and one from 1990 and the "Cowboys From Hell" era and you'll see what I mean. Point is- a rock band- even a successful one- generally has only a few years at the top. The Stones, AC/DC, Kiss, whoever- are the exceptions. How long did you really think Britny Fox could go copying Cinderella- who was in many ways copying AC/DC? If Cobain overdoses on drugs in 1989 before anyone ever hears of him- does Britny Fox really put out 10 albums?And by the way- I love Britny Fox and it's been mentioned many times how Britney Spears' "Hit Me Baby One More Time" that made her a sex symbol "borrowed liberally" from Britny Fox's "Girlschool" video. I read one rock critic state in 2002 that Poison outsold Nirvana in 2001. This doesn't really surprise me- Nirvana tends to be a downer- Poison tends to be happy and exciting even if they aren't deep. And I'm positive that "The Dirt"- Motley Crue's biography- outsold the Cobain diary that went so far as to make the cover of Newsweek. So, here's an idea. My favorite all-time station was "The Force"- which played the SleazeBees for crying out loud . . . in 1994 (!) after the hair bands had been down for- bare minimum- two years (in 1992 you still had- say- Slaughter putting out albums- though the proud genre may have peaked a couple of years before that). I don't have ratings for the station from 1994- it turned to "The X" relatively soon after. But it seemed to be very popular- everyone in my age demographic listened to it- remotes were very popular- and I tend to believe it was more the buyout of the station that changed the format than listener preferance.So, since we have "The X" for modern rock- why not try and stay a bit away from that on K-Rock? Less Godsmack- more Poison, Ratt, etc. Look, those bands in 1986 were far more popular than Godsmack or Mudvayne are in 2006. I once saw a 50 year old man going through albums in Eides with a Dangerous Toys T-shirt on in 1990. Those bands have always been absent from WDVE since- well- 1990 or so- and even then WDVE wasn't playing them so much. I think that you'd find an audience crafted from Gen Xers and also young women (I swear- you will see more attractive 20something women at a Poison concert- even today- and I'm convinced its because hair bands obviously cater to a sexy young woman more than singing "Come As You Are"). You could also pick up on contemporary bands that have that sound- such as The Donnas, The Darkness, Jet and Weezer. This is a rock audience that isn't hit currently and the audience is there- witness how Poison and Cinderella will assuredly be one of the biggest concert draws of this summer at the PG Pavillion. On a final note- while I'm sure advertising Opie and Anthony isn't a bad idea, O and A have gotten so much national pub for replacing David Lee Roth it isn't THAT necessary.