OK, here is the deal with news on the radio in boston.
1. The five-minute local newscast just is not available on the commercial band. The rip and read of ancient copy by metro newsreaders does not a five minute newscast make.
2. At one point, the market saw locally produced five minute news broadcasts on WRKO, WHDH, WBZ, WROR, WVBF and WMJX (the latter two in drive times) and a real all-news format on WEEI.
3.WBZ provided more news in greater depth in its days in five minutes at the top of the our before going all-news during Bush I's war than it does today. The hour begins with a series of promos designed to lure TSL. But if you're looking for a quick update, it's the lastl place on earth you would turn. There are no real headline updates during the half hour. WEEI developed the same problem under the pizza kings, as Doug Stephan dismantled a news operation in favor of exercise and cooking shows on the radio and a raft of "lifestyle" features. BZ does the same thing today "Hey who had the most recent kid? You? Okay, you get to do the parenting report."
4. A well done five minute newscast will give you more news faster than going to Google news or anything else. A newsperson, even without a produceer and editor, who is experienced and works for a station that values its news product can select, edit and deliver a better summary than you can get clicking here and there and getting routed to sources of questionable authority.
5. Greater Media has never done all news in this market. After the Tangers bought WTTK/WACQ, from Plough, they did what they called all-news after they bought WACQ, hiring Dick Levitan and giving us some innovations as the Newscenter 1150 Sky View Telescope which would "zoom in" on breaking news. It was a short-lived joke.
6. Metro/Shadow doesn't present news. It is a horrific operation. They rip-read ancient headlines, with no street presence. Even worse are the traffic reports. They use the same script during drive and unless they get the word of something out of the ordinary is happening (usually long after it has happened and has been cleared) they just read copy about the "usual trouble spots" even when you are either gliding through said trouble spots or are backed up three miles earlier than usual. Same words, same time every day, with nary a look at what is really happening.
7. Television audio is substituting for street reporters on WBZ, which is a reflection why its all news format is so godawful. It is useful for a live event you don't get to, but you are left with a TV reporter's attempts to add perspective and unless it's a breaking news live shot, all they care about is what they get on the next "show"
8. Good radio news is written, researched and covered for radio. It's not the same as newspapers, it's not the same as the Web (with its reliance on sources people could get fired for using in radio news. It is an art form that uses people who specialize in getting in, getting done and getting out, with an economy of words, with effective use of sound and with the understanding that you have to have some thing new and different on the next broadcast and it had better include well-sourced accurate information.
9. The worse example of news on the radio are the sports updates on WBZ-FM and WEEI. They never, ever advance a story unless it's handed to them. The bozo on WBZ-FM actuallly led with "the Patriots fell to 1-1 after losing to..." in late afternoon, nearly 24 hours after the game ended. They never update everything, they never advance a story, they never switch perspectives from last night's game to what's going on today after morning drive. Most of the sports news readers are more interested in trying to become personalities than in developing reporting skills.
10. The best radio news in Boston was done by WHDH, whether in its Voice of the City days owned by the Herald-Traveler days, or it's upbeat AC days under Blair, it was always as good as, and perhaps from time to time, a bit better than, WBZ
11. And I was a jock.