Re: not gonna happen...
WLYNgm said:
Sorry, BRNout. You have made alot of assumptions, without
FACTS to back them up. Even assuming there is as much
of an audience that you seem to think exists, there is a hole
in your assertions that you could drive a truck through:
which [size=10pt]advertisers[/size]
would pay good money to appeal to this audience???
Unless you have commitments in writing, this is not worth diddlysquat...
What do you want for facts? What would satisfy you? The fact that there is little in the way of "rhythmic" formats in a large and increasingly diverse market? That more WHITES listen to rhythmic music (and fewer to rock) than ever before? That you have all these pirates featuring rather raw urban formats to serve an unserved community?
How are the ratings at the bottom tier? For example (ownership aside, of course), wouldn't you agree that WFNX would garner A LOT more listeners if they had an urban format? I sure as Hell would. Their ratings suck. Even an urban that wasn't particularly well programmed (or bird feed) would almost certainly beat the 0.7 that they have. But, alas, they are owned by someone almost as obstinate and stubborn as you are on this subject. So, they'll sit there with no listeners, serving as the owner's personal jukebox.
Let's look at others near the bottom of the overall barrel: WCRB. Yeah, I know, a dead issue. Ownership and tradition, you know. Yet, a rhythmic CHR or urban contemporary would do better than the 2.0 overall rating that they just got. Not to mention the demos. You'd go from fossilized to youthful. Remember, you have 6 1/2% of the market that's black. And a solid chunk of whites who would listen too. Lots of potential. Mike: 2.7; WAAF 2.9 (on two signals). Again, the right format would do wonders. But, again, Entercom won't do it here.
Who is on top? WXKS with an almost unheard-of in a large market 10.2. Second? WJMN with a 7.3. And, those are about the only 'rhythmic' stations in the market. Nobody even tries to go after them.
No, this isn't merely my "unsubstantiated" opinion, this is reality. The market can use another format to shake things up. Yet you've got tons of rock/classic rock/etc. mired down in the <4.0 range. And I am the one who's wrong?
And Marc, your comparisons to Hartford are not valid either. 104.1 did reasonably well until CC screwed it up programmingwise. And WYBC actually gets some ratings there (and they do VERY well in New Haven). Not to mention that it's simply a different market and we're not discussing it. So, you're dismissed. ;D