Tony Santiago said:
You know, as much as you have posted some "hate" stuff in the past MarcR, I will answer this, since at the very least this is coming off as logic instead of a typical David Eduardo "snark" that he's been throwing on me as of late (people have warned me on the sidelines and I'm taking everything into advisement here).
Well, this is not the only place where Mr. 50 Years got smart remarks, let's not forget about the bashing of dance in the LA, Chicago, San Francisco boards, AND the bashing of the "Party 105.3" in Houston.
Tony Santiago said:
There HAVE been successes when you consider Energy 92.7 (San Francisco) and the Energy 92.7/101.1 in Phoenix. Both stations have lasted for a good amount of time. In both cases, the stations were sold. Had it NOT been the case, both stations would have still kept going. The same thing with Pulse (which still IS going)....in their case it's just financial matters with the company that actually date as far back to 2004 (BEFORE there was a "Pulse"). Party 93.1 (Miami) did strong at the beginning too.
More than that, believe it or not, there were MORE dance outlets back in the day that got their success. Let's start with Energy 92.7&5 in Chicago, 99.3/105.5 The Buzz & Hot 106.3 Atlantic City, NJ, 95.3 Party Orlando, Q96.9 Toledo, OH, Mega 99.3 Austin, TX, 92.7 Party SF, (pre-energy 92.7), oh and we also forgot about KVBE, 94.5 The Vibe Las Vegas.......DanceFactory....(I don't care what you have to say, David. Dance music on those frequencies are STILL BEING PLAYED.....let me translate....
TODAVIA JUGAR EN EL AIRE)......Groove 103.1 LA......ENERGY 96.5 HOUSTON, TX ring a bell? You want me to continue?
Tony Santiago said:
Now, the one thing that is flawed on David's thinking is that he is going under "traditional" radio mores here. That a 1.0 is bad regardless. If Pulse was on a station above 92 with a strong signal, then I would have to agree with him on that. But considering the anamolies (for the 252,634,196th time saying this regarding dial location and poor signal), a 1.0 for this is GOOD!
You know it's kinda hypocritical, that La Kalle's numbers were down the toilet and a certain someone said it was the signal. It is also hypocritical that Que Bueno is BELOW a 1.0 but that's ok because a certain individual said "they are serving their community"
Tony Santiago said:
You also have to factor in New York City. This IS a rhythmic town for the most part whether it is rhythmic/R&B/hip-hop/Spanish and yes, dance. For some other markets, dance won't necessarily work, but for New York City a dance format is actually a "necessity" here...the same way that rock stations rule the roast in Boston, country stations rule Nashville, etc.
Remember how Hip-Hop/R&B ruled Atlanta? Now look who got a "KTU" sound on their 105.7 frequency?
Tony Santiago said:
Let's also add the fact that "corporate" RUINED terrestrial radio with its overpurchasing of stations based on the Telecommunications Act of 1996. At least prior to that, you had many "mom and pop" style stations doing various formats. Emmis was still a VERY young company with few radio holdings when Hot 103 launched. So back then, the competition was more fierce because you had 20 or more companies doing different things. But now with one company owning 5 FM stations, of course each of them are going to sound "cookie cutter". The "competition" factor has been reduced and the safety issues come in.
Well, this is something that "candykid jade" member touches, but in all honesty, there is no more live and local feel or unique branding anymore. Everything is often duplicated and claim they are being imitated.
Tony Santiago said:
That's why with the few dance stations we have had and still had, they are "mom and pop". I honestly don't think corporate has the SLIGHTEST idea about dance music.....instead figuring it must be "gay" music or that "guido" crap without really researching the entire scheme of things. And for what they MAY know about dance, it's going to sound like a 'KTU....to which NOTHING WRONG WITH THAT if you are in that type of demo that appreciates known and "safe". But the dance music fan in NYC knows better. They want the "edge".
It's all stereotype, and this goes way back to the "Disco Sucks Campaign." It didn't help in the 90's when ravers would get busted operating underground parties in abandoned warehouses and the distribution of "E". Once the raves broke out to the media, their concern was "that is what dance music is, people that carry water bottles and E, wear glowsticks and beads, wear baggy pants or something colorful." IMHO, I believe that's what caused dance music to have a bad reputation thanks to the mainstream media. Can you honestly blame these DJ's for doing what they did? It was all about the passion and the respect for what they truly love, not some juvenile deliquents tresspassing and causing riots like how the media put those raves. Venues didn't want to book raves because of what the mainstream labeled them, so they either go to people they know who own a venue or made their own venue. But rave, happy hardcore, hard house,techno is just a PIECE of the dance music scene, just like how grudge, garage, and metal is a piece of the rock scene. Pulse did what they did best, and they gave US what we love, honor, and respect till this day, and there is NO ONE that can take that respect away from US. At least
THOSE stations still keep me a fan of FM radio.
And if this post shall get deleted, I apologize for saying the truth.