radioman148 said:
-
Get involved.
We want your input!
Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.
After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.
After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/
Thanks in advance and have fun!
RadioDiscussions Administrators
World's Largest Store
- Thread starter KlunkLetter
- Start date
KlunkLetter said:
Lujack has always hated appearing in public.radioman148 said:
[/quote]
...in fact, he would always have the studio drapes drawn, blocking visitors' view, when he worked at WCFL. There was a classic 1974 Klunk Letter of the Day in which he rips into an "idiot kid" for whining about it; his final suggestion was that if she wanted to watch captive mammals, Brookfield Zoo was open 7 days a week...
...in fact, he would always have the studio drapes drawn, blocking visitors' view, when he worked at WCFL. There was a classic 1974 Klunk Letter of the Day in which he rips into an "idiot kid" for whining about it; his final suggestion was that if she wanted to watch captive mammals, Brookfield Zoo was open 7 days a week...Ultimajock said:
[/quote]
He said in his book "Superjock" that he always draws the drapes.
Silkie said:
Maybe they'll send you a new catalogue.
Silkie said:
I haven't been up there with my stop watch lately. ;D
from Klunkletter:Also, as one who didn't support either major party this past election, I would comment that whenever the liberals are 'attacked' they are more prone to use the hate speech argument. I guess, I would have to question their definition of 'hate speech'.
It seems to me, it is an easy way to try and deflect attention from their policies, which are very hard to defend with a rational argument.
O-K, just because you disagree with a policy, that doesn't mean there's no rational argument for it. There are rational arguments for Liberal/Progressive policies just as there are rational arguments for Conservative policies. Three hosts who argue and defend Liberal/Progressive positions daily are :Thom Hartmann, Randi Rhodes and Stephanie Miller. And those three do offer sound, rational arguments for their Liberal/Progessive positions.
It seems to me, it is an easy way to try and deflect attention from their policies, which are very hard to defend with a rational argument.
O-K, just because you disagree with a policy, that doesn't mean there's no rational argument for it. There are rational arguments for Liberal/Progressive policies just as there are rational arguments for Conservative policies. Three hosts who argue and defend Liberal/Progressive positions daily are :Thom Hartmann, Randi Rhodes and Stephanie Miller. And those three do offer sound, rational arguments for their Liberal/Progessive positions.
Al Timiter said:
Well, I was reading with interest until the name Stephanie Miller popped up. 'Nuff said.
This stuff is VERY subjective. depending on the political persuasion of (ultimately) the advertisers and audience.
For example, Klunk, I despise Larry Lujack. You adore him. It's just personal taste. From a ptactical view, he does bring listeners and advertisiers, no dispute there, but to me, (even though he "puts it on") his as***** personality stinks.
For example, Klunk, I despise Larry Lujack. You adore him. It's just personal taste. From a ptactical view, he does bring listeners and advertisiers, no dispute there, but to me, (even though he "puts it on") his as***** personality stinks.
gr8oldies said:
How are we going to hear this Hit Parade radio? Will it be carried on a Chicago station? Will it be on the internet?
Prais said:
At least Lujack is funny and sarcastic; whereas, Miller is just mean spirited. Since both are on the far left politically (which is totally opposite of me), I guess Lujack wins since he can make me laugh.
KlunkLetter said:
The question is will they let Lujack be Lujack? It would be nice if Tommy Edwards is with him as they work very well together.
I don't think Lujack would do this gig if they put a lot of constraints on him. I think he'll look at the world thru those same sarcastic eyes he had at 'LS, 'CFL, and even WRLL.
KlunkLetter said:
Let's hope so and let's also hope that somebody in Chicago carries the show.
- Status