• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

WRTR/WENN Switch Coming Sept. 1

S

Sab

It is official

http://www.hallelujah1059.com/main.html

http://www.rock105online.com/main.html

BTW, It was me who heard the test. The signal was the same as the original up here in Warrior. I have not heard WRTR test on 105.9 yet, Id assume that is coming Tuesday night, as per the FCC filing, WRTR has to test after WENN.




Also, a little birdy told me The X is moving to the new tower in the coming weeks.





P.S. WZRR is already coming out swinging, and RTR isn't moving to town for 2 more days. Their latest promo stated "high atop red mountain, overlooking the magic city" " W Z R R BIRMINGHAM". Note: Even though RTR is based in Tuscaloosa, their new signal is over twice that of The X's current signal and is many miles northeast, so it will very much cover Birmingham. Clear Channel already did in Cox's Oldies format with Magic...Emminent domain, anyone?<P ID="edit"><FONT class="small">Edited by Sab on 08/30/05 07:06 AM.</FONT></P>
 
> P.S. WZRR is already coming out swinging, and RTR isn't
> moving to town for 2 more days. Their latest promo stated
> "high atop red mountain, overlooking the magic city" " W
> Z R R BIRMINGHAM". Note: Even though RTR is based in
> Tuscaloosa, their new signal is over twice that of The X's
> current signal and is many miles northeast, so it will very
> much cover Birmingham.


I do not see how the new WRTR signal is going to impact Birmingham much because the signal will not really be go enough in Jefferson County.
Some thing is wrong with information out there for WRAX current signal. I checked radio locator, the FCC FM Query, Recnet and can not find the actual signal WRAX uses right now. It use to be out there but every one of those sites show only the "official" license which reflects the old signal at 100.7 and the construction permit for the city of license change to Helena and modified signal. Something has to be screwed up related to the hold up in the final approval of Anniston's 100.5 move into Atlanta. WRAX is broadcasting at C1 facilities with 85kw now but not yet at the CP found for the upcoming facility change that will improve Birmingham coverage even more.
WRAX's actual current signal is at 100.5 and is stronger in Birmingham than the new 105.9 WRTR will possibly ever be.
 
>
> I do not see how the new WRTR signal is going to impact
> Birmingham much because the signal will not really be go
> enough in Jefferson County.
> Some thing is wrong with information out there for WRAX
> current signal. I checked radio locator, the FCC FM Query,
> Recnet and can not find the actual signal WRAX uses right
> now. It use to be out there but every one of those sites
> show only the "official" license which reflects the old
> signal at 100.7 and the construction permit for the city of
> license change to Helena and modified signal. Something has
> to be screwed up related to the hold up in the final
> approval of Anniston's 100.5 move into Atlanta. WRAX is
> broadcasting at C1 facilities with 85kw now but not yet at
> the CP found for the upcoming facility change that will
> improve Birmingham coverage even more.
> WRAX's actual current signal is at 100.5 and is stronger in
> Birmingham than the new 105.9 WRTR will possibly ever be.
>


I honestly can't see that WRAX is at 85kw now. The signal is the same as it has been since WANZ debuted a few years back and if it was 85kw, no matter where it is at, it wouldnt have so much interference in all of Jefferson County. I cant pick it up on the road anywhere decent, until I get to McCalla. I understand that you are referring to the old old signal at 100.7 and I can agree with you there as far as my misjudgement of signal strength. Point is, it may be a C1, but it is not 85kw, theres no way, maybe 45 or 50kw tops.

Also, a 25kw signal from Brookwood should have no problem covering Birmingham. I mean hell, I can get their current signal up here in Warrior most of the time on my outdoor antenna, and they're only running at 6kw now.
 
> Also, a 25kw signal from Brookwood should have no problem
> covering Birmingham. I mean hell, I can get their current
> signal up here in Warrior most of the time on my outdoor
> antenna, and they're only running at 6kw now.
>

Jaleo...er, uh, Sab, all of the coverage maps from the FCC Query, Radio-Locator, and RECnet say otherwise. Birmingham would get fringe coverage at best, under normal conditions. And fringe coverage doesn't exactly "cover" an area. And you're wrong--105.9's Tuscaloosa signal is SOUTHWEST of the Magic City, not northeast.

Is that signal you get in Warrior listenable for a reasonable amount of time? I'd bet it isn't. BTW, BamaWOLF beat you by a day hearing 105.5's testing, so no cookies for you. <P ID="signature">______________
Why don't you ask yo' mama for a cute closing signature?</P>
 
> > Also, a 25kw signal from Brookwood should have no problem
> > covering Birmingham. I mean hell, I can get their current
> > signal up here in Warrior most of the time on my outdoor
> > antenna, and they're only running at 6kw now.
> >
>
> Jaleo...er, uh, Sab, all of the coverage maps from the FCC
> Query, Radio-Locator, and RECnet say otherwise. Birmingham
> would get fringe coverage at best, under normal conditions.
> And fringe coverage doesn't exactly "cover" an area. And
> you're wrong--105.9's Tuscaloosa signal is SOUTHWEST of the
> Magic City, not northeast.

The maps seem to show the coverage as being essentially the same as it is now, namely pretty useless in Birmingham proper. Unless CC is planning to flip formats instead of frequencies, Rock 99 is safe.

And I think he meant that the new location was northeast of the old location, which it is, but not far enough to affect anything.

>
> Is that signal you get in Warrior listenable for a
> reasonable amount of time? I'd bet it isn't. BTW, BamaWOLF
> beat you by a day hearing 105.5's testing, so no cookies for
> you.
>
 
> > Also, a 25kw signal from Brookwood should have no problem
> > covering Birmingham. I mean hell, I can get their current
> > signal up here in Warrior most of the time on my outdoor
> > antenna, and they're only running at 6kw now.
> >
>
> Jaleo...er, uh, Sab, all of the coverage maps from the FCC
> Query, Radio-Locator, and RECnet say otherwise. Birmingham
> would get fringe coverage at best, under normal conditions.
> And fringe coverage doesn't exactly "cover" an area. And
> you're wrong--105.9's Tuscaloosa signal is SOUTHWEST of the
> Magic City, not northeast.
>
> Is that signal you get in Warrior listenable for a
> reasonable amount of time? I'd bet it isn't. BTW, BamaWOLF
> beat you by a day hearing 105.5's testing, so no cookies for
> you.
>
no, not really, he told me and i posted it... the only thing i can hear on 105.5 at night is WVNA (WYTM during the day) and WNRQ on 105.9

I honestly don't know why this place is always so hostile, come on people, quit jumping to conclusions and play nice, you know LISTENERS are on these boards too, not just those who are in the business or have nothing better to do than troll and whatnot
 
> > Jaleo...er, uh, Sab, all of the coverage maps from the FCC
>
> > Query, Radio-Locator, and RECnet say otherwise.
> Birmingham
> > would get fringe coverage at best, under normal
> conditions.
> > And fringe coverage doesn't exactly "cover" an area. And
> > you're wrong--105.9's Tuscaloosa signal is SOUTHWEST of
> the
> > Magic City, not northeast.


Yes, clichemoth was right, Im referring to WRTR's new signal, which is miles northeast of the current one.


> The maps seem to show the coverage as being essentially the
> same as it is now, namely pretty useless in Birmingham
> proper. Unless CC is planning to flip formats instead of
> frequencies, Rock 99 is safe.
>
> And I think he meant that the new location was northeast of
> the old location, which it is, but not far enough to affect
> anything.
>


Adding to what clichemoth said, it isn't going to have a huge impact immediately, as this is still a Tuscaloosa station. Yes, I know what the "maps" online say, but I also know what I hear on my radio. I can recieve WRTR in my car as well, (fading in and out), and Im about 20 miles NE of the furthest fringe line. The verdict is out as to whether or not the new signal will be much stronger, I hope to have an answer to that when the flip happens, or if I catch WRTR testing on 105.9.


> > Is that signal you get in Warrior listenable for a
> > reasonable amount of time? I'd bet it isn't. BTW, BamaWOLF
>
> > beat you by a day hearing 105.5's testing, so no cookies
> for
> > you.
> >
>


BTW, It was me who gave my buddy BamaWOLF the info (You do know he's north of Huntsville, right?) and I never claimed the RTR signal was great, no.

Im not going to re-attack. Not worth it.<P ID="edit"><FONT class="small">Edited by Sab on 08/31/05 12:35 AM.</FONT></P>
 
> BTW, It was me who gave my buddy BamaWOLF the info (You do
> know he's north of Huntsville, right?) and I never claimed
> the RTR signal was great, no.

But you were bold enough to say it would "cover" Birmingham, when that was obviously not true.
>
> Im not going to re-attack. Not worth it.

And neither shall I. By now, I should expect you to create new usernames, so consider yourself left alone.

No need to feed the trolls.
> <P ID="signature">______________
Why don't you ask yo' mama for a cute closing signature?</P>
 
> > BTW, It was me who gave my buddy BamaWOLF the info (You do
>
> > know he's north of Huntsville, right?) and I never claimed
>
> > the RTR signal was great, no.

> But you were bold enough to say it would "cover" Birmingham,
> when that was obviously not true.


Okay, now you're just twisting my words. You brought up that the signal was not good where I was. I rebuttaled saying that I agreed it was not very good. As for the covering thing, yes I did say that, and it has yet to be seen. I could be dead wrong, but Im willing to take the chance.


> > Im not going to re-attack. Not worth it.
>
> And neither shall I. By now, I should expect you to create
> new usernames, so consider yourself left alone.
>
> No need to feed the trolls.
> >


Haha, it's funny how you think Im someone else. You think this even though I claim to be Dingo's buddy, and he has even responded that I am his buddy. This is my first time posting at this board, he's had me browsing it for a while. But its posters like yourself, who like to start flame-wars, that have kept me from posting.



Anyways, I had a reason to post. As of 1:23AM on Sept. 1st: WENN has flipped to 105.5, they had already flipped by the time I got home at 11pm. WRTR has yet to flip to 105.9 for reasons I don't know. (I can confirm this because I'm currently getting a very very faint signal every so often from Praise 105.9 in Jackson.)

---Before I go any further I want to say once again, I listen via an outdoor antenna and as far as B'ham stations go I do base judgement when I am on the road, not by how I recieve it at home. Also note that Im pretty far north of B'ham, so in reality, how I recieve a signal is about where the signal would be downtown, only slightly stronger.---

Point is, I can hear WRTR cutting in every so often, they are testing on the frequency. The snippets I get are loud and clear, but I will not judge the signal until they actually do flip. I want to be able to get in my car and drive around B'ham to give an exact assessment. As soon as I can, I will.

According to the FCC filing, WENN was to test before WRTR. So WRTR doesnt have to flip yet, but WENN's new signal is 30kw, so Im positive that many in eastern Tuscaloosa County will not be happy campers if the flip doesn't take place soon. I assume it should sometime this morning, at least by tomorrow. We shall see.<P ID="signature">______________
"He deserved to have ice cream smashed in his face, because he's a lying 50 year-old man!"
-Dane Cook</P>
 
So much for "I'm not going to re-attack. Not worth it."

You've more than proven that you don't know what you're talking about, so there's no need to debate any of the sh!t you just wrote (especially how your reception in Warrior has anything to do with the reception in downtown B'ham).

Like I said before, consider yourself ignored. <P ID="signature">______________
Why don't you ask yo' mama for a cute closing signature?</P>
 
Re: So much for "I'm not going to re-attack. Not worth it."

> You've more than proven that you don't know what you're
> talking about, so there's no need to debate any of the sh!t
> you just wrote (especially how your reception in Warrior has
> anything to do with the reception in downtown B'ham).


I like how you didn't even attempt to use a quote of mine there.

>> ---Before I go any further I want to say once again, I listen via an outdoor
>> antenna and as far as B'ham stations go I do base judgement when I am on the
>> road, not by how I recieve it at home.

Anything else you wanna "debate"?


> Like I said before, consider yourself ignored.
>


If you were really ignoring me, why did you respond? Oh that's right, you think having the last word makes you correct, even when you're not.



I just recieved word from CC Tuscaloosa that WRTR did indeed flip to 105.9, but for the time being they are on, and Im quoting, "experimental low power" due to the hurricane. Tuscaloosa was hit very hard by the hurricane. They will only be on this power for a very short time, but no exact time frame was given.<P ID="signature">______________
"He deserved to have ice cream smashed in his face, because he's a lying 50 year-old man!"
-Dane Cook</P><P ID="edit"><FONT class="small">Edited by Sab on 09/01/05 08:06 PM.</FONT></P>
 
> It is official
>
> http://www.hallelujah1059.com/main.html
>
> http://www.rock105online.com/main.html
>
> BTW, It was me who heard the test. The signal was the same
> as the original up here in Warrior. I have not heard WRTR
> test on 105.9 yet, Id assume that is coming Tuesday night,
> as per the FCC filing, WRTR has to test after WENN.



According to radio-locator, the upgrade for WENN has it sending a local signal as far south as northern Chilton county. Although there's some variance to that I'm sure, here in southern Shelby county, I'm not receiving WENN on 105.5 much better than I did with the class A facilities they had on 105.9 (the signal is even more horrid driving in my car). Radio-locator has the CP at 29500 watts @ 624 ft. Is WENN still not up to the full 29.5 kw yet?





***********************************************

Need a new direction?
God specializes in "format changes!"
<FONT COLOR="#0066CC">www.passtheword.net</FONT COLOR>
 
Re: So much for "I'm not going to re-attack. Not worth it."

> You've more than proven that you don't know what you're
> talking about, so there's no need to debate any of the sh!t
> you just wrote (especially how your reception in Warrior has
> anything to do with the reception in downtown B'ham).
>
> Like I said before, consider yourself ignored.
>
why don't you just give it up, nobody wants to play flame wars with you, so just go elsewhere and be anal. Maybe he doesn't know what he is talking about, maybe he does, the fact is, your input is not needed. and i really don't give a crap what you say about me, because it is probably right<P ID="signature">______________

<div align="center"><a href="http://937thewolf.tk">
wolf_logo3a.png
</P></span></P>
 
Re: So much for

> > You've more than proven that you don't know what you're
> > talking about, so there's no need to debate any of the
> sh!t
> > you just wrote (especially how your reception in Warrior
> has
> > anything to do with the reception in downtown B'ham).
> >
> > Like I said before, consider yourself ignored.
> >
> why don't you just give it up, nobody wants to play flame
> wars with you, so just go elsewhere and be anal. Maybe he
> doesn't know what he is talking about, maybe he does, the
> fact is, your input is not needed. and i really don't give a
> crap what you say about me, because it is probably right
>

I honestly believe that a permanent ban should be in order.

I've then saying that for the longest. In a time like this with copious amounts of people (especially babies and infants) are suffering and dying in New Orleans, the last thing on my mind is to be fighting with somebody over something so petty and pointless. But I guess some of us on here just don't care.

P.S., The X can respond if you want and I really don't care at this point after a tragedy of recent, but remember this words: "There won't be any good that will come to you until you do right by others". Take your name calling energy an put it into good use like donating money, clothes, food, etc to the Red Cross, etc. because I am.
 
Re: So much for "I'm not going to re-attack. Not worth it."

> > You've more than proven that you don't know what you're
> > talking about, so there's no need to debate any of the
> sh!t
> > you just wrote (especially how your reception in Warrior
> has
> > anything to do with the reception in downtown B'ham).
> >
> > Like I said before, consider yourself ignored.
> >
> why don't you just give it up, nobody wants to play flame
> wars with you, so just go elsewhere and be anal. Maybe he
> doesn't know what he is talking about, maybe he does, the
> fact is, your input is not needed. and i really don't give a
> crap what you say about me, because it is probably right
>

I wasn't gonna join in on this, but what the hell. I know how you feel. He just attacked me out of nowhere a couple of weeks ago. Unfortunately you are just the next person on his list. Pretty soon he will be fighting with every member that posts here. According to him, everyone (including me) on this site is "Jaleo" using a different name. That's what I got accused of, and I've never even done or said anything to him before. He just woke up and descided one day, "hey, I'll attack some folks" and I was on the hitlist for some reason. I think our moderators have abandoned this forum. Maybe we should take this up with the site owners because no one can have a conversation without him attacking atleast one person. You think people would learn to be kind and support people with the rescent events, but I guess some people are just so cold hearted that it doesn't effect them. They would wrather start meaningless arguments with people they don't even know. It's sad really.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom