• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

WUFX changing network?

> I saw this link from another board. If WUFX changes to My
> Network TV does that mean Fox will move back to 40 and the
> new CW will go to 34?
http://www.broadcast> ingcable.com/article/CA6316234.html?display=Breaking+Newsine
>

I don't get it. Why would a station with an established network like Fox take such a risk?

Here's a question and a thought. Do stations have to air the My Network TV programming in a specified time slot? If not, couldn't WUFX air the programming in the afternoons to counterprogram the other stations' talk shows? Soaps have been a proven programming genre, and that's what this network will basically be showing. That way, WUFX can keep its Fox programming in prime time.

If they do have to drop Fox, I could see a fight to get it. WDBD would be one choice, and definitely a better one than 34, but I wonder if one of the big three stations might jump on it. Major affiliation changes have happened in many markets, so don't count any station out. But I'm not sure when the network contracts are coming up for renewal...
 
Secondary affiliation...

> > I saw this link from another board. If WUFX changes to My
>
> > Network TV does that mean Fox will move back to 40 and the
>
> > new CW will go to 34?
> http://www.broadcast>
> ingcable.com/article/CA6316234.html?display=Breaking+Newsine
>
> >
>
> I don't get it. Why would a station with an established
> network like Fox take such a risk?
>
> Here's a question and a thought. Do stations have to air
> the My Network TV programming in a specified time slot? If
> not, couldn't WUFX air the programming in the afternoons to
> counterprogram the other stations' talk shows?

I read somewhere that WUFX will be a secondary My TV affiliate. They'll still run Fox in primetime, and My TV late nights (or daytime). This isn't unusual; several other stations are doing the same thing.
 
Re: Secondary affiliation...

> > > I saw this link from another board. If WUFX changes to
> My
> >
> > > Network TV does that mean Fox will move back to 40 and
> the
> >
> > > new CW will go to 34?
> > http://www.broadcast>
> >
> ingcable.com/article/CA6316234.html?display=Breaking+Newsine
>
> >
> > >
> >
> > I don't get it. Why would a station with an established
> > network like Fox take such a risk?
> >
> > Here's a question and a thought. Do stations have to air
> > the My Network TV programming in a specified time slot?
> If
> > not, couldn't WUFX air the programming in the afternoons
> to
> > counterprogram the other stations' talk shows?
>
> I read somewhere that WUFX will be a secondary My TV
> affiliate. They'll still run Fox in primetime, and My TV
> late nights (or daytime). This isn't unusual; several other
> stations are doing the same thing.

A lot of local stations that had affiliations with other networks did this when the WB and UPN first came out. I remember when UPN first came on, WAPT ran a number of their shows on weekend late nights.

By the way, any word on whether WDBD or WRBJ will go to the CW?

<P ID="signature">______________
"...and the countdown continues until the neanderthals that govern college football do something about their pathetic postseason."--Tim Brando, Sporting News Radio</P>
 
Re: Secondary affiliation...

> > > > I saw this link from another board. If WUFX changes
> to
> > My
> > >
> > > > Network TV does that mean Fox will move back to 40 and
>
> > the
> > >
> > > > new CW will go to 34?
> > > http://www.broadcast>
> > >
> >
> ingcable.com/article/CA6316234.html?display=Breaking+Newsine
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > I don't get it. Why would a station with an established
>
> > > network like Fox take such a risk?
> > >
> > > Here's a question and a thought. Do stations have to
> air
> > > the My Network TV programming in a specified time slot?
>
> > If
> > > not, couldn't WUFX air the programming in the afternoons
>
> > to
> > > counterprogram the other stations' talk shows?
> >
> > I read somewhere that WUFX will be a secondary My TV
> > affiliate. They'll still run Fox in primetime, and My TV
> > late nights (or daytime). This isn't unusual; several
> other
> > stations are doing the same thing.
>
> A lot of local stations that had affiliations with other
> networks did this when the WB and UPN first came out. I
> remember when UPN first came on, WAPT ran a number of their
> shows on weekend late nights.
>
> By the way, any word on whether WDBD or WRBJ will go to the
> CW?
>
As of March 21, 2006 the CW affiliation goes to...... drumroll please..... WRBJ 34. I look for the tv stations to play musical networks this fall. With WRBJ 34 getting The CW Television Network, WUFX 35 getting MY Network TV affiliation... maybe FOX will go back to WDBD? I mean if they put FOX and My Network TV on one station that will leave WDBD and WXMS independent and im not sure if they're going to program 2 independents... It would be in their best interest to put FOX back on WDBD 40 and leave WXMS independent as apposed to teaming up FOX with MY TV on 35 and leaving WXMS and WDBD independent
 
Re: Secondary affiliation...

> > > > > I saw this link from another board. If WUFX changes
>
> > to
> > > My
> > > >
> > > > > Network TV does that mean Fox will move back to 40
> and
> >
> > > the
> > > >
> > > > > new CW will go to 34?
> > > > http://www.broadcast>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> ingcable.com/article/CA6316234.html?display=Breaking+Newsine
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > I don't get it. Why would a station with an
> established
> >
> > > > network like Fox take such a risk?
> > > >
> > > > Here's a question and a thought. Do stations have to
> > air
> > > > the My Network TV programming in a specified time
> slot?
> >
> > > If
> > > > not, couldn't WUFX air the programming in the
> afternoons
> >
> > > to
> > > > counterprogram the other stations' talk shows?
> > >
> > > I read somewhere that WUFX will be a secondary My TV
> > > affiliate. They'll still run Fox in primetime, and My TV
>
> > > late nights (or daytime). This isn't unusual; several
> > other
> > > stations are doing the same thing.
> >
> > A lot of local stations that had affiliations with other
> > networks did this when the WB and UPN first came out. I
> > remember when UPN first came on, WAPT ran a number of
> their
> > shows on weekend late nights.
> >
> > By the way, any word on whether WDBD or WRBJ will go to
> the
> > CW?
> >
> As of March 21, 2006 the CW affiliation goes to......
> drumroll please..... WRBJ 34. I look for the tv stations to
> play musical networks this fall. With WRBJ 34 getting The
> CW Television Network, WUFX 35 getting MY Network TV
> affiliation... maybe FOX will go back to WDBD? I mean if
> they put FOX and My Network TV on one station that will
> leave WDBD and WXMS independent and im not sure if they're
> going to program 2 independents... It would be in their
> best interest to put FOX back on WDBD 40 and leave WXMS
> independent as apposed to teaming up FOX with MY TV on 35
> and leaving WXMS and WDBD independent
>
From Variety.com "CW net signs 6 more affils"
The CW has signed six more affiliates, increasing its national coverage to 68% of the U.S.
Newly signed stations include KWBA Tucson, Ariz., owned by Cascade Broadcasting Group; Roberts Broadcasting's WZRB Columbia, S.C., and WRBJ Jackson, Miss.; and KWTX Waco and KBTX Bryan, Texas, as well as WTVY, Dothan, Ala., all digital stations of the CBS affiliates owned by Gray Television.

All of the stations are UPN affiliates except KWBA which is WB affiliation
 
Re: Secondary affiliation...

> From Variety.com "CW net signs 6 more affils"
> The CW has signed six more affiliates, increasing its
> national coverage to 68% of the U.S.
> Newly signed stations include KWBA Tucson, Ariz., owned by
> Cascade Broadcasting Group; Roberts Broadcasting's WZRB
> Columbia, S.C., and WRBJ Jackson, Miss.; and KWTX Waco and
> KBTX Bryan, Texas, as well as WTVY, Dothan, Ala., all
> digital stations of the CBS affiliates owned by Gray
> Television.
>
> All of the stations are UPN affiliates except KWBA which is
> WB affiliation
>

We've seen major network shakeups in many cities, including Birmingham, Mobile, and New Orleans. I wonder what the odds are that there will be one in Jackson. Could we see WLBT, WJTV, or WAPT dropping their network affiliation and going for Fox? Usually, the domino effect is started when a station gets sold. I haven't been keeping up with Jackson lately. Are any stations potentially on the block? Or is there any chance that WDBD might make a play for one of the big three networks instead of Fox, assuming any affiliation agreements are coming up for renewal?
 
Re: Secondary affiliation...

> > As of March 21, 2006 the CW affiliation goes to......
> > drumroll please..... WRBJ 34. I look for the tv stations
> to
> > play musical networks this fall. With WRBJ 34 getting The
>
> > CW Television Network, WUFX 35 getting MY Network TV
> > affiliation... maybe FOX will go back to WDBD? I mean if
> > they put FOX and My Network TV on one station that will
> > leave WDBD and WXMS independent and im not sure if they're
>
> > going to program 2 independents... It would be in their
> > best interest to put FOX back on WDBD 40 and leave WXMS
> > independent as apposed to teaming up FOX with MY TV on 35
> > and leaving WXMS and WDBD independent

Wow! I thought all along that WDBD would be the one that would show the CW because of its stronger signal. I'm not opposed to WRBJ getting the affiliation since they'll probably be on most cable and satellite systems by the time of the CW's launch. Since WUFX will be the My Network affiliate in Jackson, it would make since for Fox to go back to WDBD. <P ID="signature">______________
"...and the countdown continues until the neanderthals that govern college football do something about their pathetic postseason."--Tim Brando, Sporting News Radio</P>
 
Re: Secondary affiliation...

> > From Variety.com "CW net signs 6 more affils"
> > The CW has signed six more affiliates, increasing its
> > national coverage to 68% of the U.S.
> > Newly signed stations include KWBA Tucson, Ariz., owned by
>
> > Cascade Broadcasting Group; Roberts Broadcasting's WZRB
> > Columbia, S.C., and WRBJ Jackson, Miss.; and KWTX Waco and
>
> > KBTX Bryan, Texas, as well as WTVY, Dothan, Ala., all
> > digital stations of the CBS affiliates owned by Gray
> > Television.
> >
> > All of the stations are UPN affiliates except KWBA which
> is
> > WB affiliation
> >
>
> We've seen major network shakeups in many cities, including
> Birmingham, Mobile, and New Orleans. I wonder what the odds
> are that there will be one in Jackson. Could we see WLBT,
> WJTV, or WAPT dropping their network affiliation and going
> for Fox? Usually, the domino effect is started when a
> station gets sold. I haven't been keeping up with Jackson
> lately. Are any stations potentially on the block? Or is
> there any chance that WDBD might make a play for one of the
> big three networks instead of Fox, assuming any affiliation
> agreements are coming up for renewal?
>
I would love to see Fox on a VHF station and start carrying a Fox newscast and leave the local news and shows as is. but that would probally never happen. But if WLBT or WJTV went with Fox then 40, 35, or 34 would get NBC or CBS. Could you imagine what grandma would do if she couldn't get Bob Barker on 12 anymore, since she has never watched anything on UHF? We would have to buy get her a better coat hanger. With all these new stations coming on in recent years its almost impossible to get every channel clear with an outdoor antenna. 3 and 12 are in Raymond, 16 and 40 off Maddox road, 10 is downtown, 35 in Vicksburg, 34 in Magee and not sure where 29 and 27 are but I have to get out and turn the antenna everytime I change channels, I need a rotator. I guess its time to get cable.
 
Re: Secondary affiliation...

While we are on the subject of TV, does anyone know what the deal is with 53 and 49? Channel 53 is simulcasting a univision station(channel 35) in Oklahoma city with their local news and commercials, all in Spanish of course. And the audio is also turned wide open. It nearly burst the speakers when you tune past it. Channel 49 had some independent network with lots of old movies, Lucy and Beverly Hillbillies but the video has been messed up for months, its just a nearly white screen with some buzzing audio in the background. Apparently the station has been abandoned. It also used to simulcast on channel 8 but I'm not sure if that one is still on the air since I can't pick it up. Lastly I used to pick up a very very weak station on channel 23 coming from Jackson State. Its still listed in the newpaper tv guide but I haven't picked up channel 23 in a long time. Is it still around?
 
Re: Secondary affiliation...

> While we are on the subject of TV, does anyone know what the
> deal is with 53 and 49? Channel 53 is simulcasting a
> univision station(channel 35) in Oklahoma city with their
> local news and commercials, all in Spanish of course. And
> the audio is also turned wide open. It nearly burst the
> speakers when you tune past it. Channel 49 had some
> independent network with lots of old movies, Lucy and
> Beverly Hillbillies but the video has been messed up for
> months, its just a nearly white screen with some buzzing
> audio in the background. Apparently the station has been
> abandoned. It also used to simulcast on channel 8 but I'm
> not sure if that one is still on the air since I can't pick
> it up. Lastly I used to pick up a very very weak station on
> channel 23 coming from Jackson State. Its still listed in
> the newpaper tv guide but I haven't picked up channel 23 in
> a long time. Is it still around?

I've seen some video (albeit extremely snowy) on 49 every now and then, so I would like to believe that it hasn't been abandoned. As for 8, if it's simulcasting 49, I'm guess the same thing is happening.
<P ID="signature">______________
"...and the countdown continues until the neanderthals that govern college football do something about their pathetic postseason."--Tim Brando, Sporting News Radio</P>
 
Re: Secondary affiliation...

> I would love to see Fox on a VHF station and start carrying
> a Fox newscast and leave the local news and shows as is. but
> that would probally never happen. But if WLBT or WJTV went
> with Fox then 40, 35, or 34 would get NBC or CBS. Could you
> imagine what grandma would do if she couldn't get Bob Barker
> on 12 anymore, since she has never watched anything on UHF?
> We would have to buy get her a better coat hanger. With all
> these new stations coming on in recent years its almost
> impossible to get every channel clear with an outdoor
> antenna. 3 and 12 are in Raymond, 16 and 40 off Maddox
> road, 10 is downtown, 35 in Vicksburg, 34 in Magee and not
> sure where 29 and 27 are but I have to get out and turn the
> antenna everytime I change channels, I need a rotator. I
> guess its time to get cable.

I was discussing this with a cousin of mine. He thinks, too, that it's time for 40, 35 and 27 to start having their own newscasts. Some of you may remember in the early 90s when WDBD had a nightly one-hour newscast called Mississippi News Tonight, which actually broadcasted statewide. However, it didn't last six months. Gene Edwards (who eventually went to WAPT afterwards and later to MPB, where he is now) and Bob Noonan (later became news director/noon anchor at WDAM-TV 7 in Laurel-Hattiesburg) were co-anchors. Michael Rubenstein left WLBT to work for MNT. The operation, however, only lasted about six months or so. I was hoping that WDBD would've tried a nightly news broadcast again. I seem to remember later on that Fox was going to push its affiliates into having newscasts (at the time when WDBD was Fox). Maybe it was just their O&O stations.

BTW, I can get 27 and 29 pretty clearly in my neck of the woods.<P ID="signature">______________
"...and the countdown continues until the neanderthals that govern college football do something about their pathetic postseason."--Tim Brando, Sporting News Radio</P>
 
Re: Secondary affiliation...

> While we are on the subject of TV, does anyone know what the
> deal is with 53 and 49? Channel 53 is simulcasting a
> univision station(channel 35) in Oklahoma city with their
> local news and commercials, all in Spanish of course. And
> the audio is also turned wide open. It nearly burst the
> speakers when you tune past it. Channel 49 had some
> independent network with lots of old movies, Lucy and
> Beverly Hillbillies but the video has been messed up for
> months, its just a nearly white screen with some buzzing
> audio in the background. Apparently the station has been
> abandoned. It also used to simulcast on channel 8 but I'm
> not sure if that one is still on the air since I can't pick
> it up. Lastly I used to pick up a very very weak station on
> channel 23 coming from Jackson State. Its still listed in
> the newpaper tv guide but I haven't picked up channel 23 in
> a long time. Is it still around?
>

Jackson State's channel 23 has had technical problems for a while now. They are moving the transmitter to a new building along with the new WJSU-FM/HD transmitter. They should have it back on the air sometime this summer if not before.

RFB
 
WUFX to be My Network; WDBD to switch back to FOX

> > I saw this link from another board. If WUFX changes to My
>
> > Network TV does that mean Fox will move back to 40 and the
>
> > new CW will go to 34?
> http://www.broadcast>
> ingcable.com/article/CA6316234.html?display=Breaking+Newsine
>
> >
>
> I don't get it. Why would a station with an established
> network like Fox take such a risk?
>
> Here's a question and a thought. Do stations have to air
> the My Network TV programming in a specified time slot? If
> not, couldn't WUFX air the programming in the afternoons to
> counterprogram the other stations' talk shows? Soaps have
> been a proven programming genre, and that's what this
> network will basically be showing. That way, WUFX can keep
> its Fox programming in prime time.
>
> If they do have to drop Fox, I could see a fight to get it.
> WDBD would be one choice, and definitely a better one than
> 34, but I wonder if one of the big three stations might jump
> on it. Major affiliation changes have happened in many
> markets, so don't count any station out. But I'm not sure
> when the network contracts are coming up for renewal...
>

According to Mike Dunlop, General Manager for 27, 35, and 40, Fox is moving back to channel 40, possibly as early as May. When the move occurs, the digital 41 will broadcast Fox HD. WB will move to 35 temporarily, until Sept. 6, when 35 will be solely a My Network affiliate.

Why do the move? Simple, WUFX 35 is not in stereo but WDBD 40 is. Also, WDBD is more centrally located in the market with a higher tower, giving better coverage. The only reason FOX left 40 in 2001 was that the moronic owners at the time, Pegasus Broadcasting (which declared bankruptcy if I recall correctly), got in a fight with FOX over affiliate fees and flipped 40 to WB. Pegasus started looking for a buyer for 27, 40, and the rights to build 35 a few months after this. They sold the stations to Jackson Television and the right to 35 to Mississippi Television in April 2003.

As mentioned before, WRBJ 34 will become the CW affiliate. Now, if DirecTV will hurry up and add WRBJ to the lineup.
 
Re: WUFX to be My Network; WDBD to switch back to FOX

> According to Mike Dunlop, General Manager for 27, 35, and
> 40, Fox is moving back to channel 40, possibly as early as
> May. When the move occurs, the digital 41 will broadcast
> Fox HD. WB will move to 35 temporarily, until Sept. 6, when
> 35 will be solely a My Network affiliate.
>
> Why do the move? Simple, WUFX 35 is not in stereo but WDBD
> 40 is. Also, WDBD is more centrally located in the market
> with a higher tower, giving better coverage. The only
> reason FOX left 40 in 2001 was that the moronic owners at
> the time, Pegasus Broadcasting (which declared bankruptcy if
> I recall correctly), got in a fight with FOX over affiliate
> fees and flipped 40 to WB.

It's also the only one with HD, right? It would be nice to see FOX 40 again. I remember when the network first launched! It was a stupid move to ever change it, especially to WB.
 
Re: WUFX to be My Network; WDBD to switch back to FOX

> > > I saw this link from another board. If WUFX changes to
> My
> >
> > > Network TV does that mean Fox will move back to 40 and
> the
> >
> > > new CW will go to 34?
> > http://www.broadcast>
> >
> ingcable.com/article/CA6316234.html?display=Breaking+Newsine
>
> >
> > >
> >
> > I don't get it. Why would a station with an established
> > network like Fox take such a risk?
> >
> > Here's a question and a thought. Do stations have to air
> > the My Network TV programming in a specified time slot?
> If
> > not, couldn't WUFX air the programming in the afternoons
> to
> > counterprogram the other stations' talk shows? Soaps have
>
> > been a proven programming genre, and that's what this
> > network will basically be showing. That way, WUFX can
> keep
> > its Fox programming in prime time.
> >
> > If they do have to drop Fox, I could see a fight to get
> it.
> > WDBD would be one choice, and definitely a better one than
>
> > 34, but I wonder if one of the big three stations might
> jump
> > on it. Major affiliation changes have happened in many
> > markets, so don't count any station out. But I'm not sure
>
> > when the network contracts are coming up for renewal...
> >
>
> According to Mike Dunlop, General Manager for 27, 35, and
> 40, Fox is moving back to channel 40, possibly as early as
> May. When the move occurs, the digital 41 will broadcast
> Fox HD. WB will move to 35 temporarily, until Sept. 6, when
> 35 will be solely a My Network affiliate.
>
> Why do the move? Simple, WUFX 35 is not in stereo but WDBD
> 40 is. Also, WDBD is more centrally located in the market
> with a higher tower, giving better coverage. The only
> reason FOX left 40 in 2001 was that the moronic owners at
> the time, Pegasus Broadcasting (which declared bankruptcy if
> I recall correctly), got in a fight with FOX over affiliate
> fees and flipped 40 to WB. Pegasus started looking for a
> buyer for 27, 40, and the rights to build 35 a few months
> after this. They sold the stations to Jackson Television
> and the right to 35 to Mississippi Television in April 2003.
>
>
> As mentioned before, WRBJ 34 will become the CW affiliate.
> Now, if DirecTV will hurry up and add WRBJ to the lineup.
>

Just out of curiosity, did you speak to Mike Dunlop, or if not, where did you get this info from? I believe you, but I just want something on record.<P ID="signature">______________
"...and the countdown continues until the neanderthals that govern college football do something about their pathetic postseason."--Tim Brando, Sporting News Radio</P>
 
Re: WUFX to be My Network; WDBD to switch back to FOX

> > > > I saw this link from another board. If WUFX changes
> to
> > My
> > >
> > > > Network TV does that mean Fox will move back to 40 and
>
> > the
> > >
> > > > new CW will go to 34?
> > > http://www.broadcast>
> > >
> >
> ingcable.com/article/CA6316234.html?display=Breaking+Newsine
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > I don't get it. Why would a station with an established
>
> > > network like Fox take such a risk?
> > >
> > > Here's a question and a thought. Do stations have to
> air
> > > the My Network TV programming in a specified time slot?
>
> > If
> > > not, couldn't WUFX air the programming in the afternoons
>
> > to
> > > counterprogram the other stations' talk shows? Soaps
> have
> >
> > > been a proven programming genre, and that's what this
> > > network will basically be showing. That way, WUFX can
> > keep
> > > its Fox programming in prime time.
> > >
> > > If they do have to drop Fox, I could see a fight to get
> > it.
> > > WDBD would be one choice, and definitely a better one
> than
> >
> > > 34, but I wonder if one of the big three stations might
> > jump
> > > on it. Major affiliation changes have happened in many
> > > markets, so don't count any station out. But I'm not
> sure
> >
> > > when the network contracts are coming up for renewal...
> > >
> >
> > According to Mike Dunlop, General Manager for 27, 35, and
> > 40, Fox is moving back to channel 40, possibly as early as
>
> > May. When the move occurs, the digital 41 will broadcast
> > Fox HD. WB will move to 35 temporarily, until Sept. 6,
> when
> > 35 will be solely a My Network affiliate.
> >
> > Why do the move? Simple, WUFX 35 is not in stereo but
> WDBD
> > 40 is. Also, WDBD is more centrally located in the market
>
> > with a higher tower, giving better coverage. The only
> > reason FOX left 40 in 2001 was that the moronic owners at
> > the time, Pegasus Broadcasting (which declared bankruptcy
> if
> > I recall correctly), got in a fight with FOX over
> affiliate
> > fees and flipped 40 to WB. Pegasus started looking for a
> > buyer for 27, 40, and the rights to build 35 a few months
> > after this. They sold the stations to Jackson Television
> > and the right to 35 to Mississippi Television in April
> 2003.
> >
> >
> > As mentioned before, WRBJ 34 will become the CW affiliate.
>
> > Now, if DirecTV will hurry up and add WRBJ to the lineup.
> >
>
> Just out of curiosity, did you speak to Mike Dunlop, or if
> not, where did you get this info from? I believe you, but I
> just want something on record.
>
No problem. I totally understand on verifying facts. I asked Mike Dunlop via email, which he replied to.

Below is actual text from email:

xxxxxxx, you have it all figured out. Fox will be moving to Fox 40 hopefully in
May and will broadcast in HDTV at that time. My Network will be broadcast on
WUFX 35. Both networks will premier on Sept. 6, 06. I may change the call
letters on WDBD. Stay tuned, you the viewer will win in these changes. Mike
 
Re: WUFX to be My Network; WDBD to switch back to FOX

> > According to Mike Dunlop, General Manager for 27, 35, and
> > 40, Fox is moving back to channel 40, possibly as early as
>
> > May. When the move occurs, the digital 41 will broadcast
> > Fox HD. WB will move to 35 temporarily, until Sept. 6,
> when
> > 35 will be solely a My Network affiliate.
> >
> > Why do the move? Simple, WUFX 35 is not in stereo but
> WDBD
> > 40 is. Also, WDBD is more centrally located in the market
>
> > with a higher tower, giving better coverage. The only
> > reason FOX left 40 in 2001 was that the moronic owners at
> > the time, Pegasus Broadcasting (which declared bankruptcy
> if
> > I recall correctly), got in a fight with FOX over
> affiliate
> > fees and flipped 40 to WB.
>
> It's also the only one with HD, right? It would be nice to
> see FOX 40 again. I remember when the network first
> launched! It was a stupid move to ever change it, especially
> to WB.
>

It was definitely stupid, but Pegasus Broadcasting has made stupid decisions on several occasions. They flipped another FOX the same way in another market (Portland, Maine, if I remember correctly).
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom