There is more to this than just making a COL change.
I would assume Cumulus is trying to get a full 100kW ERP for WYAY which would help coverage/building penetration. We tried to do this in 2005 when the transmitter was moved to the Fish tower. At that time the offer was $200,000 to WOKA and ABC would pay to convert their existing antenna to a directional or $200k to turn down their power so contours did not collide. At that time they were not interested.
In the application exhibit the dollar value has been blacked out. I wonder how much they are offering now? Back then the consultants told us it was a now or never deal.
I think we will see many changes to come for lots of stations because of more accurate signal modeling, terrain analysis, and the FCC being more liberal. Even if they don't get it done I am glad to see that Cumulus is investing in a signal upgrade and hope thay get it done.
Here are the links to the CDBS:
https://licensing.fcc.gov/cdbs/CDBS...?appn=101480213&qnum=5340©num=1&exhcnum=3
https://licensing.fcc.gov/cgi-bin/w...xt=25&appn=101480213&formid=301&fac_num=48727
I would assume Cumulus is trying to get a full 100kW ERP for WYAY which would help coverage/building penetration. We tried to do this in 2005 when the transmitter was moved to the Fish tower. At that time the offer was $200,000 to WOKA and ABC would pay to convert their existing antenna to a directional or $200k to turn down their power so contours did not collide. At that time they were not interested.
In the application exhibit the dollar value has been blacked out. I wonder how much they are offering now? Back then the consultants told us it was a now or never deal.
I think we will see many changes to come for lots of stations because of more accurate signal modeling, terrain analysis, and the FCC being more liberal. Even if they don't get it done I am glad to see that Cumulus is investing in a signal upgrade and hope thay get it done.
Here are the links to the CDBS:
https://licensing.fcc.gov/cdbs/CDBS...?appn=101480213&qnum=5340©num=1&exhcnum=3
https://licensing.fcc.gov/cgi-bin/w...xt=25&appn=101480213&formid=301&fac_num=48727
Goat Rodeo Cowboy said:jambox said:The application is for a City of License change only. No other changes are happening.
But the discussion seems to revolve around the question: "Is this change for city of license a first step that will facilitate some future application that could involved a facility change."
The discussion has turned into a parlor game of figuring out what future application could and could not work.