Who would actually notice? That show has extremely low ratings.
So long as the ratings aren't 0.0, the hundreds of thousands (at least) of people who watch the show.
Who would actually notice? That show has extremely low ratings.
So long as the ratings aren't 0.0, the hundreds of thousands (at least) of people who watch the show.
WEATHER
South Carolina Meteorologist Unleashes on Angry Viewers
By Stephanie Tsoflias Siegel on Oct. 25, 2017 - 11:24 AMComment
WPDE meteorologist, Ed Piotrowski, gave viewers in the Myrtle Beach-Florence, South Carolina market a piece of his mind.
On Monday night, at 10:20pm, he says a Tornado Warning came into the station. At that time, Piotrowski broke into ABC programming. The Good Doctor was on the air. That’s when he says, in a lengthy Facebook post, that emails came in.
“As you might imagine, people came out of the woodworks and let me have it. In one email, a guy wrote: “Get off the TV! If someone dies, it’s their fault!”. I’m serious. That’s exactly what he typed then actually hit send. In another email, a woman wrote: “I hope your TV station gets hit and you’re in it. Put The Good Doctor back on!”, he said in his Facebook post.
I think the weatherman is right-TV stations are obligated to be a public service first. WYFF/4 here in Greenville/Asheville had the same problem when there was a lot of severe weather during a NASCAR race a few weeks ago, and they used a split screen to cover both. WSPA/7 was able to do long form coverage because the Chargers-Giants game ended a few minutes before the storms fired up. What stations need to do is put their weather policy on their websites, Facebook, etc more often, so that people know that it might happen.
It might be excusable in the eyes of the owners, but in the eyes of a lot of viewers there is no excuse other than greed for pre-empting a regular program with infomercials.
Since I'm not a DWTS fan, I didn't witness this bulletin for myself, but the FB page for my local Sinclair-operated ABC affiliate, WICS-20.1 Springfield (with repeater WICD-15.1 Champaign) is lighting up with complaints on why the station interrupted part of Dancing With the Stars tonight for a severe weather break-in. The warning was for the far southwestern corner of their viewing area, southwestern Macoupin Co., IL (about 50 miles SW of Springfield). Closer to St. Louis than Springfield, and an area where WICS may actually have few viewers despite KDNL. However, the cell, although it has weakened, was heading northeast and could affect the Springfield area if it still holds together:
https://www.facebook.com/pg/WICSABC20/posts/?ref=page_internal
Not many DWTS fans were happy, however--and probably would still be unhappy even if the storm was impacting Springfield during the show.
http://www.adweek.com/tvspy/south-carolina-meteorologist-unleashes-on-angry-viewers/195848
Now a South Carolina Weather talent for WPDE has been a target of a rant because its interrupted a prime time show.
https://www.facebook.com/EdPiotrowskiWPDE/posts/10155882411092716
Also Ed Piotrowski did a rant on why the station thought it was the right thing to air breaking news. First of all he cited evidence from the radar from Accu-weather and National Weather Service thatt was hitting parts of South Carolina.
Is it a requirement that they HaVE to interrupt when a Tornado Warning is issued?
If the warning comes via the EAS system, stations are required to broadcast the warning.
My weather-related gripe concerns the time that I was specifically watching a newscast for weather-related information pertinent to my own area, and just when they were about to get to something relevant to me, COMCAST interrupted the coverage to announce another watch or warning in a neighboring county at least 45-50 miles from me!I think the weatherman is right-TV stations are obligated to be a public service first. WYFF/4 here in Greenville/Asheville had the same problem when there was a lot of severe weather during a NASCAR race a few weeks ago, and they used a split screen to cover both. WSPA/7 was able to do long form coverage because the Chargers-Giants game ended a few minutes before the storms fired up. What stations need to do is put their weather policy on their websites, Facebook, etc more often, so that people know that it might happen.
Channel 4 once did something like that during Sunday night football back when Nancy Van Camp was still there. Nowadays, they could probably run a crawl across the screen of their main channel, and move the actual weather coverage to a sub-channel.The first two quarter and a little bit of the third quarter of the Titans preseason game at the Chiefs on WKRN-2 here in Nashville used split screen during gameplay with the game audio at 10% and 90% in studio meteorologist audio, and full weather screen and full in studio meteorologist audio during the game's commercials and halftime.
The average person might not get that subchannel. Most people wouldn't have a premium cable package, and dishes probably wouldn't have that. If they had an antenna, that might work, but people need to be prepared for that to work, maybe with a converter box. And what if the signal wasn't good enough? There's a good chance of that during severe weather.Nowadays, they could probably run a crawl across the screen of their main channel, and move the actual weather coverage to a sub-channel.
Our local CBS affiliate once pushed their weather coverage off onto a (then) cable-only public affairs channel when a storm came through during March madness, only running crawls across the screen of the main channel. I had to watch weather coverage on other TV stations, and told them that, in an email to them. I suggested to them that they make that additional public affairs channel available as a subchannel, which they later did.The average person might not get that subchannel. Most people wouldn't have a premium cable package, and dishes probably wouldn't have that. If they had an antenna, that might work, but people need to be prepared for that to work, maybe with a converter box. And what if the signal wasn't good enough? There's a good chance of that during severe weather.
Normal programming on the subchannel might be a better idea.
My own pre-emption-related gripe was when all three major networks interrupted coverage for O.J. Simpson's parole hearing a couple of months ago. Granted, it was daytime TV, but I still don't think O.J. warranted that much media attention. I remembered that a few days previously, they had discussed this on The Talk, and Julie Chen (married to the chairman of CBS, and a (former) newswoman in her own right) stated that she didn't think that the parole hearing was important enough to warrant interrupting normal programming. Yet, a few days later, The Talk itself fell victim to this pre-emption. Yet they never again addressed this pre-emption on future episodes.
To their credit, channel 4, the NBC affiliate here in Nashville, did not immediately go to parole hearing coverage, as they were in the middle of their noon newscast, but I believe that they were awaiting the verdict of a trial of local importance here. However, upon conclusion of the newscast, they, too, joined the parole hearing already in process.
Hey, AG, have you noticed whether or not there is an increase in the amount of infomercials on TV whenever Than Merrill or other real estate "gurus" are coming into town? I have noticed that whenever he is coming here, there are more pre-emptions than usual; sometimes he is even simultaneously running the same infomercial over competing stations!
Mostly, the only other infomercials that I see are for some ant-aging skin care stuff that Cindy Crawford and a doctor whose name I can't pronounce are promoting. And they usually run those on major holidays in order to shorten the newscast and give the news anchors some time off.
Otherwise, the only infomercials that I see are the ones for Time-Life, and those usually run at out-of-the-way times, often on subchannels. I am not even certain if those are actually "pre-empting" anything.
Yeah, Saturday night has become a bit of a TV wasteland in recent years. Probably just pre-empted a rerun, anyway.I haven't noticed in the Memphis area if anything like this is happening. The main time I can remember anything in prime time being pre-empted wsa when WREG in Memphis pre-empted the 7 PM CT show on Saturday nights for an infomercial for Operation Smile. But I don't watch as much TV from the Big 4 now. I'm mostly watching cable, subchannels, or streaming.
Yeah, Saturday night has become a bit of a TV wasteland in recent years. Probably just pre-empted a rerun, anyway.
I don't blame you for turning the networks off.
I recall that channel 4, the NBC affiliate here, once pre-empted Friday night programming at 7:00 in favor of a Time-Life infomercial. I thought it odd that they would pre-empt on a Friday evening, but I don't recall what was bumped, so it must not have been "must-see-TV" after all, regardless of what NBC might tell us!The only Saturday night programming on the Big 4 I might watch is if there's a college football game I'm interested in this time of the year.