• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

A Change Coming to KGO

Having exactly one incomplete semester of college to my name, I felt insecure for a while, especially in journalism.

Then I found Peter Jennings, then anchor of ABC's World News Tonight, was not only a drop-out, but a high school drop-out who had dropped out because he'd flunked tenth grade.

I'm all for higher education, but it's not the ultimate litmus test of anyone's intelligence, worth or ability to learn.
One of the brightest, creative newspaper people I ever worked with was a man named Ken, who had started interning at the paper while still in high school and was hired -- over the objection of the publisher's wife, who valued college education above experience when it came to full-timers -- right out of high school. He advanced to sports editor, copy desk chief and, finally, design editor before his unfortunate death from a pulmonary embolism at 47. No college grad in the building, including several with advanced degrees, was more capable.
 
This gets back to what I said earlier in this thread. Based on my market observations, I believe traditional radio usage in San Francisco is lower than a lot of other places. Especially among younger people. Same with Seattle. If you look at the stations people listen to, the Top 10 is different from other major markets.
You make an interesting point.

I looked at market cume rating for LA, SF, HOU and NYC for 18-34 for the book that came out Tuesday and the prior two books.

New York 72.8 with weekly TSL of 4:41
LA 76.4 with weekly TSL of 5:41
SF 70.6 with weekly TSL of 4.52
HOU 76.0 with weekly TSL of 5:34

If you go to 25-34, it jumps up to just under 80. And on 25-54, it goes to near the mid 80's, but on the low side.

New York always has lower TSL because so many people use public transit and can't listen to radio in many or maybe most cases.

Which leaves SF on the low side with no reason except market uniqueness. I suspect part of this... and maybe all of the uniqueness... is in the nearly 30% Asian ethnicity of the market. Nielsen has no differential treatment of Asians, has no recruiting procedure for any Asian language and, thus, likely severely undermeasures that group due to language issues.

Seattle has a simpler explanation: it is the whitest of all those markets, and it can be shown that Blacks and Hispanics, for a variety of reasons, use radio more than non-Hispanic whites. Fewer Blacks and Hispanics, lower usage. We see that in places like Milwaukee and Fargo and Minneapolis, too.
 
So you're against all corporate donations? Immoral? Control of the Senate affects all of us. It decides what rights all of us has, or whether the next 2 years is nothing but performative investigations of Donald Trump's opponents.
Again, as I pointed out to Y2K---the Chronicle piece is about private citizens donating. And there's a cap of $100 on those donations.

I'm still waiting to hear how that's immoral. And what it would look like if candidates could only raise money from the people they'd represent if elected.

Corporate money in political campaigns is a whole 'nuther discussion.
 
Those listeners were mainly above 25-54, and the hosts were all getting paid as though the station was still #1. So it was an expensive staff with falling revenue. They needed to do something, since Disney & Citadel had done nothing. Going all-news wasn't the best idea either, but they needed to put a plug in the dike.
All-news, while misbegotten—especially with KCBS getting the 106.9 simulcast—at least took advantage of the large news staff KGO still had. Even with THAT amount of overhead, it was less expensive than a large roster of talk talent proving less and less ROI.

It just never had a chance because longtime KGO listeners were being faced with the blunt truth, and they (especially an oft-discredited blogger) lashed out, and still lash out, at Cumulus instead.
 
That's a fascinating take.

But let's just go with the practical for now. If---IF---we were to suddenly limit campaign contributions to the people who would be represented by the candidate involved (be that city, county, congressional district or senate), that would put candidates who live in places with fewer and less well-off people at a significant disadvantage when it comes to funding a campaign.

What's the solution?
You have not illustrated a problem. You have illustrated how politicians should run for office: without a staff of political consultants, and without needing to be so wealthy that they can quit their day job for several months just to campaign.

So you're against all corporate donations? Immoral?
Yes, of course. Owning or controlling a corporation is not a pass out of immorality.

Control of the Senate affects all of us. It decides what rights all of us has, or whether the next 2 years is nothing but performative investigations of Donald Trump's opponents.
I'm pretty sure you only feel this way because you think the donors in San Francisco would agree with your perspective. If it was oil & gas millionaires in Texas, would you still feel this way?
 
KGO is the flagship station of California Golden Bears football. Thankfully for the Golden Bears and their fans, no game is scheduled today. Maybe that is why the station's transformation is happening this particular weekend.
 
All-news, while misbegotten—especially with KCBS getting the 106.9 simulcast—at least took advantage of the large news staff KGO still had. Even with THAT amount of overhead, it was less expensive than a large roster of talk talent proving less and less ROI.

As I recall, Cumulus flipped several talk stations to news, including WYAY Atlanta, and was rumored to be launching a national news service with the help of CNN. I'm sure it seemed like a great idea (just as it did to Randy Michaels when he started Merlin Media). But people weren't using radio in 2011 the way they did in the 90s. So it all collapsed, bringing KGO where it is now. As you say, it's easier to blame radio companies for all this, but the real culprit is the radio audience itself.
 
Inside Radio coverage of the KGO change. Mark Thompson wanted to say "goodbye" to his audience:


This is typical boomer thinking. Mark Thompson shouldn't be saying "goodbye" to his audience. He should be looking for a way to re-engage with them on his own platform, where he can say & do what he wants without restrictions. That doesn't mean another radio station.
 
However, when it comes to country music, I haven't become calcified. In fact, I'm more enthusiastic about current country now than I have been in many years, Am I an oddity among country listeners? Are most my age listening to classic country on FM (if their markets have a station), the internet, or satellite, or is there a thread running through country music that keeps current hits of interest across the generations in a way that pop doesn't?
I don't know the current demographics for Country stations (David?), but historically, Country has been an adult format (25-54?) while Top 40 in the 60s and 70s was aiming for teens and CHR is 18-34.
 
Inside Radio coverage of the KGO change. Mark Thompson wanted to say "goodbye" to his audience:


This is typical boomer thinking. Mark Thompson shouldn't be saying "goodbye" to his audience. He should be looking for a way to re-engage with them on his own platform, where he can say & do what he wants without restrictions. That doesn't mean another radio station.
That would also explain the sudden nature of the flip. They possibly realized Mark was very close to going off-script and “going rogue”, effectively taking the station hostage.

 
I have removed a few political posts. The do not belong here.
I had to step away for an hour, so I don't know what was removed, but there was a conversation about KGO's programming involved in that Mark Thompson was discussing the Georgia Senate race when the station dumped his show and went to the promotion of the new format, and, barring any partisan position, I thought the discussion of local talk radio (and its audience's) interest in out-of-state races (something PTBoardOp opposes) is relevant and interesting.
 
That would also explain the sudden nature of the flip. They possibly realized Mark was very close to going off-script and “going rogue”, effectively taking the station hostage.

Let's not read too much into that. Mark said nothing that indicates he was on the verge of making the announcement himself. Most pros won't.

The fact of the matter is KGO mishandled that. If you want to be sure talent doesn't talk about the change, make the change before they go on the air, or don't tell them and make the change at the end of the show, after the mics are off.

Letting someone get nine minutes into their show after the news and then pulling the plug at 10:16 is disrespectful to the audience and the talent.
 
Last edited:
The fact of the matter is KGO mishandled that. If you want to be sure talent doesn't talk about the change, make the change before they go on the air, or don't tell them and make the change at the end of the show, after the mics are off.

Letting someone get nine minutes into their show after the news and then pulling the plug at 10:16 is disrespectful to the audience and the talent.
One of my friends on Discord noted that the flip of “FM News 101” in Chicago was done with far more dignity, and all “FM News” did was interrupt a pre-taped newscast at 10:03 a.m. with a terse shutdown announcement.
 
I had to step away for an hour, so I don't know what was removed, but there was a conversation about KGO's programming involved in that Mark Thompson was discussing the Georgia Senate race when the station dumped his show and went to the promotion of the new format, and, barring any partisan position, I thought the discussion of local talk radio (and its audience's) interest in out-of-state races (something PTBoardOp opposes) is relevant and interesting.
The posts which are deleted are partisan in nature.
 
Letting someone get nine minutes into their show after the news and then pulling the plug at 10:16 is disrespectful to the audience and the talent.

That may be, but there's NOTHING in a format change that's respectful to the audience or talent. That's not why it's done. The time for respect was while the format was on the air. Once this decision has been made, that time is over. That may sound brutal, but that's business.
 
That may be, but there's NOTHING in a format change that's respectful to the audience or talent. That's not why it's done. The time for respect was while the format was on the air. Once this decision has been made, that time is over. That may sound brutal, but that's business.
BigA:

There's business and then there's business that makes you look bad. Again, I'm not arguing for a "gosh, weren't we wonderful" production piece on the history of KGO. But it's pretty f-ing simple to program the server to hit the promo loop at the top of the hour after the legal ID. There are 24 spots on the clock where you can do that in any given day. 10:16 am is just bush league. Doing it at 8:10 am would at least have been clever (for the two people who got it).
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom