Yes. I think more stations should follow suit instead of canning the alternative format altogether.You think stations like KNDD in Seattle becomes local
Yes. I think more stations should follow suit instead of canning the alternative format altogether.You think stations like KNDD in Seattle becomes local
Yes. I think more stations should follow suit instead of canning the alternative format altogether.
Audacy stock closed today at 34 cents. It started the year at $2.75. So I don't see a time soon when they can afford local night hosts.
It may be hard for casual readers to grasp just how bad this situation is. But these changes aren't being made casually.
The market cap for Audacy is $49 million. That's how much it would take to buy the entire company. That's 10% of what it was worth 5 years ago.
KGO died from multiple self-inflicted wounds, the worst being ABC brass and Mickey Luckoff being totally unable to realize the impact of the PPM.Who thinks WINS will go FM permanently and 1010 will go BetQL? A stretch...but given KGO...???
That assumes, of course, that every holder of every share of stock would be willing to sell at $0.34 a share. Obviously, that ain't gonna happen.
I think most investors have reached the conclusion that a reorganization, likely via Chapter 11, is inevitable.
We'll almost definitely be hearing about some headcount reductions soon with regard to the newly combined news operation in New York, too.
He is Audacy’s hero of the day due to what he accomplished with KVIL. Understandably he’s probably being considered the best person for the job of managing the remaining Alt stations. We’ll see if under his steerage things will get better. He’s managed to at least stop the bleeding at the other Alts he oversees, with a couple turning it around and having some decent ratings besides KVIL. It’s a shame he won’t get the chance to turn WNYL around too.It looks like it will be up to John Allers as to what happens there.
It’s wild that we’ve all posted how expensive it is to change formats, yet we’ve seen companies pull trigger and change formats without even giving them a try to fix. Its been said before that radio isn’t in the music distribution business, but all of a sudden they’re in the news distribution business? I currently work in tv news. What percentage gets their news from radio, in which they don’t already get it from tv or social media? This is exactly why younger audiences are ditching radio. Radio, like local tv news is stuck in the past. In tv, we’re adding 12 more hours a day (exaggeration) of news, on very limited staffs. Why oversaturate markets with news as a quick fix and breed creativity and invest in the current product? Let’s keep shoving news down people‘s throats when many are looking to get away from depressing topics! Do I dare share links of how many abandoned news during and after COVID? Everyone has said for months, “news needs to go on 92.3”. But no one has said why other than “well they’re struggling in 6+ so they must flip!”He is Audacy’s hero of the day due to what he accomplished with KVIL. Understandably he’s probably being considered the best person for the job of managing the remaining Alt stations. We’ll see if under his steerage things will get better. He’s managed to at least stop the bleeding at the other Alts he oversees, with a couple turning it around and having some decent ratings besides KVIL. It’s a shame he won’t get the chance to turn WNYL around too.
If im the owner of two pizza joints that sit right next to each other in nyc, that serves the exact same menu, no one would think in a few years that it might be an issue?Because they don't own a crystal ball. No one knows the future. They've owned these stations for 25 years. That's a long time.
If im the owner of two pizza joints that sit right next to each other in nyc, that serves the exact same menu, no one would think in a few years that it might be an issue?
Its been said before that radio isn’t in the music distribution business, but all of a sudden they’re in the news distribution business?
What percentage gets their news from radio, in which they don’t already get it from TV or social media? This is exactly why younger audiences are ditching radio. Radio, like local TV news is stuck in the past.
Everyone has said for months, “news needs to go on 92.3”. But no one has said why other than “well they’re struggling in 6+ so they must flip!”
The current 92.3 format will move to 92.3 HD2. (as mentioned above)
No announcement as to where "New Arrivals" (currently heard on 92.3 HD2) will land.
(HD3? Audacy app only?)
What usually happens with a format shunted off to HD2+:
it'll be there for 6-24 months and then when it becomes just a jukebox and a financial drag for the operator,
it gets terminated from the airwaves (possibly to continue on an app).
The New York Metro Survey Area extends out to the East End of Suffolk. AM sort of reaches there, but the ESB FMs do not. So for the immediate future... meaning five years or more... the AM should remain.Eventually, I could definitely see WINS going FM only, though I think we’re quite a ways from that point. It takes time to move a big enough portion of the audience to FM to nix the AM part of the simulcast.
In the case of SF, the AM covers more of the market than the FM. In Atlanta, the AM is limited by the terrible ground conductivity.After all, KCBS in SF started simulcasting in 2008 and it’s still simulcasting. WSB in Atlanta has been simulcasting since 2010.
The two news stations are each tailored geographically. WINS, which is directional and does not cover much of the New Jersey segment of the NYC market, aims at Manhattan and the Boroughs. WCBS aims for Jersey and Long Island and the upstate counties in the metro.If im the owner of two pizza joints that sit right next to each other in nyc, that serves the exact same menu, no one would think in a few years that it might be an issue?
The "alt" brand should just die out on audacy stations and return them to being local. Entercom at one time used to know how to program alternative stations (like krbz a while back or knrk.) Now they're the worst sounding, even behind iheart and cumulus. Alternative as a whole has some of the most passionate listeners of any genre and if you find the right sub-set, I think you'd hit a gold mine of listeners. There's plenty of different Alternative artists releasing music right now.It's not "all of a sudden." Both of these radio stations have been doing news since the mid 1960s. So it's over 50 years. These stations have their own reporters who cover and deliver these stories. Radio stations don't own record labels. They don't have employees who perform original music. They play recordings that are owned by other companies. However they own the news content they deliver. Same with talk shows. The radio companies own those shows. Not the music.
There is nothing radio can provide that can't be found someplace else. Same with music. Why should radio play music if people can get the songs they want from Spotify? Seems to me the reason younger people are ditching radio is because they want specific songs rather than hear playlists made by someone else. Does Spotify provide news? No. However radio news stations also provide their news to social media where people can get it as well. They can do that because they own the news content. They don't own music.
The station is struggling in all demographics. Even young people don't like the station. Check these boards and you'll see everyone disliked the music, the personalities, and the commercials. The music was either too pop or too old. There was nothing they did right. On the other hand, WINS is a popular radio station. People listen to it even though it's on AM. So now they can hear it on FM, and they won't complain about the music anymore.
Great points! But, is a radio message board a fair barometer of what 92.3 should do. From reading each message board, you’d think rock music should be illegal and that apparently only white people listen to alternative.It's not "all of a sudden." Both of these radio stations have been doing news since the mid 1960s. So it's over 50 years. These stations have their own reporters who cover and deliver these stories. Radio stations don't own record labels. They don't have employees who perform original music. They play recordings that are owned by other companies. However they own the news content they deliver. Same with talk shows. The radio companies own those shows. Not the music.
There is nothing radio can provide that can't be found someplace else. Same with music. Why should radio play music if people can get the songs they want from Spotify? Seems to me the reason younger people are ditching radio is because they want specific songs rather than hear playlists made by someone else. Does Spotify provide news? No. However radio news stations also provide their news to social media where people can get it as well. They can do that because they own the news content. They don't own music.
The station is struggling in all demographics. Even young people don't like the station. Check these boards and you'll see everyone disliked the music, the personalities, and the commercials. The music was either too pop or too old. There was nothing they did right. On the other hand, WINS is a popular radio station. People listen to it even though it's on AM. So now they can hear it on FM, and they won't complain about the music anymore.
how popular are Hank Williams, sr., George strait and lefty frizzell in New York city?The real issue is "What else can they do with a big old AM?"