https://www.cnn.com/2025/02/14/medi...rce-one-oval-office-gulf-of-mexico/index.html
This is right out of Orwell's 1984. It was called Newspeak in the book...
This is right out of Orwell's 1984. It was called Newspeak in the book...
After repeatedly stopping reporters from The Associated Press from being in the same room as President Donald Trump, the White House on Friday doubled down, appearing to bar the organization’s journalists from traveling on Air Force One as well.
The feud, which the White House Correspondents’ Association has called a violation of the First Amendment and Trump’s own executive order on free speech, began Tuesday and stems from AP’s recent decision to ignore the president’s Day 1 order renaming the Gulf of Mexico the “Gulf of America.”
In a post on X, Trump deputy chief of staff Taylor Budowich said that ignoring the “lawful” renaming is “divisive” and “exposes the Associated Press’ commitment to misinformation.”
Wow. That suggests our government could shut down this website or only allow certain opinions to be posted. But that could never happen. Or could it?I get it that this site doesn't want political discussion. When the free press is being stifled by a President, the operators of this website may want to take notice. History is filled with examples of other regimes that shut down anyone who
We are getting close to that now.Wow. That suggests our government could shut down this website or only allow certain opinions to be posted. But that could never happen. Or could it?
Yes Reuters is the next best thing. However they have to deal with Elon Musk. Every time Elon Musk talks about defunding NPR, PBS, public media affiliates and CPB. I always wonder when Trump and Musk will start calling for Reuters to be banned from the White House in the same way the Associated Press had just faced. This is given that Reuters did an extensive investigative story on Elon Musk and how Toxic he is at all of his companies and the local NPR and PBS affiliates either investigated him directly or reposted Reuters articles on Musk. It is a warning sign to me that Reuters is the next target in all of this every time I hear the Defund PBS, NPR, Public Media affiliates and CPB.Other than the Associated Press, isn't Reuters the next best thing? Have they been adversely affected by 'the Trump effect'?
radioink.com
Other than the Associated Press, isn't Reuters the next best thing? Have they been adversely affected by 'the Trump effect'?
“Reuters was paid millions of dollars by the US government for ‘large scale social deception,’” Musk proclaimed in an X post that has racked up more than 76,000 shares and 35 million views. “They’re a total scam. Just wow.”
The contract was real, but the Orwellian phrase Musk seized on to suggest a shadowy conspiracy wasn’t what it seems. A slightly closer look would have revealed that the contract, signed during President Donald Trump’s first term, was for help defending against cyberattacks — that is, combating deception, not fueling it. And it went to a separate division of the company, not the news agency.
I've long thought that if the media had backbone at all, they'd have pulled out of the White House long ago.
It's chilling what's happening, but hardly surprising. Speaking Truth to Power won't work with the current administration. Look what just happened with the Eric Adams case. Everything is transactional for Trump.You're focusing on the wrong side of this. AP has reporters in lots of places, not just the white house. Everyone knows they're getting propaganda at press conferences. That's what press conferences are, regardless of where they are.
The problem here is that the white house is weaponizing access. They're saying to someone: You must report our propaganda our way or we shut down your access. At the same time, they're engaging in a social media campaign to attack AP credibility.
I wouldn't be surprised if every recent administration had a longing for the good old days when reporters hid from the public the fact that FDR was crippled and kept mum about all of Jack Kennedy's mistresses.
What happens when the free media gets disbanded. What will we talk about. It’s going to be hard not to bring politics into it when it’s literally destroying the medium.I just deleted nearly a dozen posts that had nothing, zero, zilch to do with radio, TV or any kind of electronic media.
Please, it it does not at least marginally have to do with broadcasting, refrain from posting it.
You are speculating with no basis in fact.What happens when the free media gets disbanded. What will we talk about. It’s going to be hard not to bring politics into it when it’s literally destroying the medium.