• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

"Newsroom culture clash" at CBS News

The main reason DHS is there is because some right wing YouTube guy posted a video, and the government believed it. There was no factual proof in the video, no real evidence. But it was good enough for the government to send troops. Meanwhile, they say anything CBS says is fake news. They don't believe the governor, the mayor, or the chief of police. Just a YouTuber.

Hey now...didn't you hear? Minnesota is a hotbed of fentanyl and illegal immigrants pouring over their border with both Mexico and Venezuela! Something must be done now! #sarcasm.
 
Variety has been going after the CBS News story. This is the latest piece. I don't think there's anything particularly new in there, but it does summarize what's been going on up to this point.


Pull quote at the very end:

To journalists, Weiss is an outsider who is skilled at attracting digital attention but prone to traditional TV flubs. And she appears to take a dim view of her staff, releasing multiple statements about how America has lost trust in the mainstream media. And yet, if she and CBS News journalists want to win new audiences, they’ll all need to hold their noses and get along.
In other words, mutual trust is a big problem there.
 
The main reason DHS is there is because some right wing YouTube guy posted a video, and the government believed it. There was no factual proof in the video, no real evidence. But it was good enough for the government to send troops. Meanwhile, they say anything CBS says is fake news. They don't believe the governor, the mayor, or the chief of police. Just a YouTuber.


Meanwhile, CBS is being taken to task because they're not like Walter Cronkite.
Its taken to task because nobody wants another Fox News. Do you?
 
Its taken to task because nobody wants another Fox News. Do you?

Here's what the president says about CBS News

THEY ARE NO BETTER THAN THE OLD OWNERSHIP, who just paid me millions of Dollars for FAKE REPORTING about your favorite President, ME! Since they bought it, 60 Minutes has actually gotten WORSE!”

How is it like Fox News if he calls it fake?
 
Its taken to task because nobody wants another Fox News. Do you?
Yes. From my perspective, I'd like more conservative traditional services to balance CNN, whatever MSNBC is now called, ABC, NBC and CBS.
 
Here's what the president says about CBS News



How is it like Fox News if he calls it fake?
People on the right don't accept it as there own, and people on the left don't try it even because there's a thing a lot of leftwing public figures do which is called "grifting" rightward which is seen a lot online, but people know what it is. Me personally, I think Tony is doing okay, but that's what you're seeing.
 
Yes. From my perspective, I'd like more conservative traditional services to balance CNN, whatever MSNBC is now called, ABC, NBC and CBS.
If the service starts with "we are conservative first, and objective and unbiased second," then that's....problematic. News is "who what when where and why." Report what happened, rather than how it makes you feel or if it fits your own personal narrative. More importantly (and I'm sure you know this due to your extensive experience in Latin America) if the "news" outlet begins and ends with "whatever the government/regime/leader tells us is correct" then that's even worse.

Going back to a post I made earlier about the current US President's claim he was going to "lower drug prices by 600 percent," it should be the job of an unbiased (as much as possible) news outlet to point out that such a claim is mathematically impossible, rather than saying (as a reply said) "well, what the President really meant to say was..."

The government/regime/leader doesn't need the press to stand up for it...they already have the power to put out an official narrative. The job of a free press is not - and should never be - to reinforce that official narrative, conservative or liberal.
 
If the service starts with "we are conservative first, and objective and unbiased second," then that's....problematic. News is "who what when where and why." Report what happened, rather than how it makes you feel or if it fits your own personal narrative. More importantly (and I'm sure you know this due to your extensive experience in Latin America) if the "news" outlet begins and ends with "whatever the government/regime/leader tells us is correct" then that's even worse.

Going back to a post I made earlier about the current US President's claim he was going to "lower drug prices by 600 percent," it should be the job of an unbiased (as much as possible) news outlet to point out that such a claim is mathematically impossible, rather than saying (as a reply said) "well, what the President really meant to say was..."

The government/regime/leader doesn't need the press to stand up for it...they already have the power to put out an official narrative. The job of a free press is not - and should never be - to reinforce that official narrative, conservative or liberal.
I think in this example most people have an idea where the puck is headed before it gets there at CBS. Trump and MAGA hosts don't accept Bari Weiss as one of their own. Megyn Kelly called her a lesbian who is trying to make the news sentimental (make Tony the "Oprah" of news.) Left-wing viewers anticipate it being a Fox clone. So it basically doesn't leave it with many people.
 
So it basically doesn't leave it with many people.

Remember that most people under the age of 50 don't watch network news. So what Bari seems to be aiming for is creating video that they can put on YouTube and other places that get people talking. It's not about being left or right. Just provocative.
 
Remember that most people under the age of 50 don't watch network news. So what Bari seems to be aiming for is creating video that they can put on YouTube and other places that get people talking. It's not about being left or right. Just provocative.
Well, as of now, I think they're doing okay with CBS Evening News so my points are moot so far. I'd probably become pretty repulsed if it becomes "Fox-ified" though. Have you watched?
 
You mean Scott Jennings or is there another Scott on there that does that now too?
Scott Jennings, a man with his head so far up Trump's backside he can name his brand of hairspray by the smell alone.

I've seen some of the clips of this guy, and while I understand CNN's need to "present the other side" or whatever, it reminds me of Jon Stewart's famous take down of "Crossfire" over 2 decades ago...yes, it really has been that long. And they didn't learn.

(Edited to add the video)

 
Last edited:
Scott Jennings, a man with his head so far up Trump's backside he can name his brand of hairspray by the smell alone.

I've seen some of the clips of this guy, and while I understand CNN's need to "present the other side" or whatever, it reminds me of Jon Stewart's famous take down of "Crossfire" over 2 decades ago...yes, it really has been that long. And they didn't learn.

(Edited to add the video)


Jennings pulled a stunt last Friday that would have cost anyone else their job on CNN:

616628740_10231356959042972_2194305411325181447_n.jpg


Here's what Gov. Walz actually tweeted:


616819457_10231356956682913_2201198480913587293_n.jpg


No, Jennings isn't a journalist, but the road is littered with the careers of commentators who got sideways with the truth on social media.
 
Remember that most people under the age of 50 don't watch network news. So what Bari seems to be aiming for is creating video that they can put on YouTube and other places that get people talking. It's not about being left or right. Just provocative.

I suppose I wouldn't mind the provocative thing if Mrs. Weiss was factually correct. The problem is, thus far, she has (mostly) gotten the factual information wrong.
 


Back
Top Bottom