Back in October 2025, there was a thread on career paths in broadcasting and having a backup career in another field. I wrote a magnum opus on my own story at the time; I won't repeat it but will link to it here:
Radio Layoffs and "Back-up Careers"
There's a slight irony for me that the subject has come up again: today (March 6) is 40 years and one week to the day that I was forcibly removed from broadcasting. In the unlikely event that you would care about what happened next, it's in the post I linked to.
Tell me about it. I’m a 30 year old with a MBA and what many people consider a “good job.” What do I think about all day? The 10 years I spent in radio doing something I loved. Can’t say I feel the same way about what I do now. It’s unfortunate that those 10 years I had were probably the end of it, since radio jobs aren’t as plentiful these days. It was even better back when I started in 2013/2014. I have plenty of peers who will say “oh nobody listens to the radio anymore.” Tell me about it. Otherwise I wouldn’t be sitting here on Microsoft Excel trying to figure out the answer to something so mind numbingly boring lol
I certainly didn't have the emotional investment in my own career the second time around. There is good and bad in that. As a journalist, I could be dogmatic at times and resistant to alternate approaches to various situations. As someone in information technology, I quickly learned that "there's more than one way to do it" (the semi-official slogan of anyone who's ever programmed in the Perl language), especially when trying to fix an errant program at 3 am that I had never seen before. I still have my opinions, but I am far more open-minded now.
Yeah. I'm really blessed. My wife and I were talking about life in general the other day ( but radio is how we met) and I said I would not have wanted to be born any earlier or any later. I landed in exactly the right window, and that especially applies to radio and TV.
I went back to CapRadio yesterday for the first time since I retired 26 months ago. A friend and former colleague at KFBK has a high-school sophomore nephew who's considering journalism for a college major and a career, so I set up a visit for them and then tagged along.
Even given the challenges that organization has had to endure (largely because of a former General Manager now facing felony fraud and embezzlement charges), that was four of the best years of my life, and it was great to be back there for an hour or so and see how people I love are building a great organization back.
As for my friend's nephew, my friend and I were honest with him about journalism---in general and broadcast journalism in particular, or just broadcasting---as a career.
My biggest advice was to have a fallback. I didn't, and I'm glad I didn't, because there were points along the way in 53 years where I would have used it, and then I would have missed out on some of the best experiences and relationships in my life.
But NOBODY going in today (assuming they can get in) can afford to wing it the way I did. The odds are increasing that you won't survive a layoff and the opportunities for next acts are shrinking.
I honestly don't know what I would do if I were starting out today in my teens or 20s.
Luck has been underemphasized in many of these discussions. Also important is attentiveness to opportunities when and if you get those lucky breaks. I think there are many fewer opportunities than there used to be.
And, because there's no point in talking if nobody's listening (Rod Stewart, "Young Turks", 1981, but that's not important now), why would I choose to communicate via a medium people have largely abandoned?
TV was appealing to me in the 1980s because it had the resources to allow me to tell stories from all over the country---even at a local station. I've had the chance to chat with a couple of people who have what are regarded as really good TV news gigs today, and most of that has evaporated, along with the compensation.
You might be interested in this Substack post, an interview with Jeremy Jojola, who just moved from a job with KUSA to a job at parent company Tegna, focusing entirely on reporting via social media and so-called "vertical videos":
A 9NEWS journalist burned out on TV news. Now he's betting on a format he thinks could save it.
Journalism school has a legitimate payoff and use (in my opinion). I can’t say the same about broadcasting school. I don’t understand why anyone would want to pay to learn something that (many) radio stations could teach someone for free. That’s how I ended up here. I was a high school kid who wanted to learn about radio, and I found a station that needed me.
I can’t imagine how bad things would have turned out if I went to broadcasting school and didn’t try to set myself up with other options. It’s no wonder that so many broadcast programs have shut down for good.
Particularly in radio, I've noticed a certain amount of anti-college sentiment. I always thought that was foolish. Some people looked down on me because I was a college student. I remember my first radio job, where most of my co-workers had arrived from a St. Louis-based trade school. If something bad happened to them, their thought was that they would just get another job somewhere else.
I faced an interesting fork in the road at age 19. I was in the pre-journalism sequence at the University of Missouri, and needed to satisfy a mathematics requirement. Most pre-J students took Math 12, which was more about the history of mathematics than anything. It was considered an easy course. Journalism students had the reputation of being bad at math. Hardcore me took 80, which was introductory calculus. And did well at it. So well that the instructor, multiple times, begged me to switch to an engineering sequence. I didn't, but it was clear that I had some talent at mathematics. At the time, I felt engineering was kind of boring. (Ironies abound: ten years later, I got a master's degree in computer science, which is closely related to computer engineering, but more mathematical in nature.) I also really loved my political science and economics classes, which I would have had to de-emphasize with such a switch. Ultimately, I graduated with two degrees, one in political science, one in journalism, even with J-school's tendency to try to absorb all my time. Even with all that, though, when the KTRH ax swung 40 years and a week ago, I didn't have a backup plan.
I have some involvement with a multidisciplinary program at Missouri where some of the students are in journalism school but also seeking to branch out with courses in history, political science, and the law. Some of them have issues with their journalism professors who think they should spend all their time on their journalism classes and do nothing else. I faced that problem, too. The J-school has taken some steps in the right direction: the old silos between print and broadcast aren't as strict as they were before: "convergence journalism" with a combined print and broadcast newsroom is now the focus. Students do podcasts, Tik-Tok videos, Instagram, other forms of social media. They're getting exposure to AI. But some of the J-school profs haven't quite gotten the memo yet that a specialized, narrow education isn't going to serve their students well.
The school I went to taught communications law and business, and those things are applicable to digital media today. I've visited my college and they now teach podcast production, digital music scheduling, and voicetracking. They're educating people for digital media today. They also have a single semester course in radio history, but it's taught as history, not as training for the present.
Which I think relates to what I wrote immediately above.
I think the money aspect is a huge problem for a lot people.
Yes. It's even more so today, with student loans. It may be too expensive to follow what you really want to do with those loans hanging over your head. And, if you run into financial trouble, you can't easily get out from under that debt. They can't be discharged in bankruptcy unlike, say, loans taken out by overambitious radio conglomerates hurtling headlong into a dwindling market.
In these discussions, I often detect a certain breezy "if I did it, you can do it, too" attitude. That ignores the role of luck, of resources you can fall back on, and of disposition and talents,
and of the sheer cost of everything now. Forty-five years of Ronald Reagan-inspired winner-take-all greed in our economy has benefited a few people at the expense of everyone else, especially of younger generations. They have a heavier burden now.