• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

KFNN 1510 Gone Silent?

Does this include the tower lease? I don’t think Salem would be happy for a “progressive talk” station broadcasting from one of their towers.
Is the KFNN tower site owned by Salem? I had no idea
Or at least move 1580 back to the KXEG tower and lower the power so that it’s still in 99.3’s coverage area. Then activate an HD2 on 101.1 or 104.3 for expanded coverage with those who have HD in their cars.
I'm not sure how they could make that work now that 1190 shares the tower as well.
 
Is the KFNN tower site owned by Salem? I had no idea
KFNN is diplexed with KKNT 960, so yes.
Is the KFNN tower site owned by Salem? I had no idea

I'm not sure how they could make that work now that 1190 shares the tower as well.

KQFN is currently on the KSUN tower, which I believe is triplexed. I don’t see why they can’t on the KXEG tower.
 
All-news radio didn't work when KTAR/620 tried it in the '70s. It has a less-than-zero chance 50 years later, on AM or FM.
 
All-news radio didn't work when KTAR/620 tried it in the '70s. It has a less-than-zero chance 50 years later, on AM or FM.
Maybe, just maybe, someone will bring back "Adult Standards" 😁 yeah, I know...

Pay iHeart for the KOY calls, and pipe in Westwood One's Adult Standards. Find a few assisted living centers, and mortuaries as advertisers...and you're good to go!
 
Last edited:
Does this include the tower lease? I don’t think Salem would be happy for a “progressive talk” station broadcasting from one of their towers.


Or at least move 1580 back to the KXEG tower and lower the power so that it’s still in 99.3’s coverage area. Then activate an HD2 on 101.1 or 104.3 for expanded coverage with those who have HD in their cars.

i meant whatever signal Sierra H bought.. if its there to feed a translator, you ned very little from the am
 
i meant whatever signal Sierra H bought.. if its there to feed a translator, you ned very little from the am
True. But, they’ll have to still cover Tempe (COL) and the 99.3 translator contour at the same time, which might be tricky. Unless they can do some kind of maneuvers that can move it to a closer suburb like Peoria since Tempe already has two other allocations in use already.
 
What about the 95.9 translator? Do we know what's happening with that then?
Looking at the price (which is a bit lower than the inferior KFNN facility with Scottsdale-specific 105.3), I doubt KQFN comes with the 95.9 translator.
 
True. But, they’ll have to still cover Tempe (COL) and the 99.3 translator contour at the same time, which might be tricky. Unless they can do some kind of maneuvers that can move it to a closer suburb like Peoria since Tempe already has two other allocations in use already.
translators have no city of license coverage requirements, as i seem to recall and changing COL's in a big metro area where other things are already licensed to the city.. is pretty easy
 
translators have no city of license coverage requirements, as i seem to recall and changing COL's in a big metro area where other things are already licensed to the city.. is pretty easy
As far as I'm aware, the only requirement is that a co-owned translator's service contour has to remain entirely within the primary station's 60 dBu contour (for FM) or daytime 2.0 mV/m contour (for AM).

If the translator and primary station are not co-owned, then this rule does not apply if I remember correctly. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong about any of this.
 
If it works, it works. Consider this: Phoenix is much more liberal now than they were 15-20 years ago.

As a metro area? We're still home to Turning Point, the Goldwater Institute and Alliance Defending Freedom - three of the most consequential organizations in the world. And a lot of bands still skip Phoenix for Tucson (which is far more "liberal"). I routinely see those red hats locally, whether in a Costco or at a ball game - I have never, ever seen a red hat in Tucson or Bisbee. 92.3, which pretty banks on people not knowing about 91.5, is evidence of how miniscule that "15-20 years ago" is.
 
As a metro area? We're still home to Turning Point, the Goldwater Institute and Alliance Defending Freedom - three of the most consequential organizations in the world. And a lot of bands still skip Phoenix for Tucson (which is far more "liberal"). I routinely see those red hats locally, whether in a Costco or at a ball game - I have never, ever seen a red hat in Tucson or Bisbee. 92.3, which pretty banks on people not knowing about 91.5, is evidence of how miniscule that "15-20 years ago" is.
On the other hand, look at voting trends. AZ went blue for the first time since 1996 in 2020 and was red by barely a nose hair in 2024. Even though Phoenix is still home to many conservative institutes, it's more than clear that the demographics have changed.
 
On the other hand, look at voting trends. AZ went blue for the first time since 1996 in 2020 and was red by barely a nose hair in 2024. Even though Phoenix is still home to many conservative institutes, it's more than clear that the demographics have changed.
Metro Phoenix, especially in the city itself, has a much larger US-born Hispanic population than it had 30 years ago, and most of them vote Democrat. That is most of the difference. Some areas, notably Tempe and Ahwatukee, also have a larger Black population than they had then. Most of them also vote Democratic.
 
As a metro area? We're still home to Turning Point, the Goldwater Institute and Alliance Defending Freedom - three of the most consequential organizations in the world.
Whoa. Influential in the United States perhaps, but open to debate as to being "most" of anything. Outside of the U.S., not even a fraction of one percent know what those are and even less care about their influence on American opinion.
 


Back
Top Bottom