Now that Emmis has these two stations, any thoughts to what they can do to improve both signals to Terre Haute? Moving towers, power increases?? Thoughts?
Milo Miller said:Now that Emmis has these two stations, any thoughts to what they can do to improve both signals to Terre Haute? Moving towers, power increases?? Thoughts?
dfwrunner said:Milo Miller said:Now that Emmis has these two stations, any thoughts to what they can do to improve both signals to Terre Haute? Moving towers, power increases?? Thoughts?
They should focus on their COL. If not, they should shut it down and let the Seymour 92.7 upgrade.
PTBoardOp94 said:1130 is a fairly blank frequency to the west. There are no stations on the frequency in Illinois or Missouri.
But any increase would require a directional antenna to protect:
WISN in Milwaukee
WEDI outside Cincinnati (Daytime-only)
WOFC in Murray, KY
So, Emmis might be able to build a 4 tower directional array to send more power due west down I-70, but I think you would be very optimistic if you thought WFNF could get 5kW days and 1kW nights. Note the above does not consider any adjacent station protections, so the pattern might need to be tighter
Kent said:Plus, I believe it would have to protect KWKH 1130 in Shreveport and WBBR 1130 after dark. Both are directional away from Indiana at night, but I could still see them causing problems and requiring a very expensive antenna array. There's no way such an upgrade would be worthwhile for Emmis!
Hoosierky said:So, Emmis might be able to build a 4 tower directional array to send more power due west down I-70, but I think you would be very optimistic if you thought WFNF could get 5kW days and 1kW nights. Note the above does not consider any adjacent station protections, so the pattern might need to be tighter
dfwrunner said:They should focus on their COL.
N_D_Radioguy said:dfwrunner said:They should focus on their COL.
Perhaps they should also use carts or a live orchestra.
COL is an antiquated concept.
Rosebud3 said:I believe the CP for 1230 Khz. has been issued to Bott Broadcasting which specializes in religious broadcasting. Birach Broadcasting wants to move the 640 Khz. frequency to Peotone, Illininois, a village of 3,000 plus people some 36 miles from Chicago. However, Birach wants to build a four tower array and increase the power to 4,800 watts with a night-time power of 1,500 watts. Birach's station in Zeeland, Michigan will then be shut down and the license sent back to the FCC so there will be no interference. I wrote an informal objection to this along with three other people and Word Power sent a Petition to Deny to the FCC. Birach spent $52,000 in a FCC auction a couple of years ago to build in Terre Haute and now wants to cover a good portion of Chicago and northern Indiana. I think $52,000 for a Chicago station is a bargain! I hope the FCC denies the Birach plan but won't Sima Birach have to operate the station for two years in Terre Haute if the Peotone application is denied?
busterluck said:Birach has AM cp's that remain unbuilt. Recently he turned off a 9 tower full time 10KW AM in Pennsylvania. The 640 fequency might not be allowed to move under a recently adopted FCC policy of moving to a larger market. As for 1230, Bott is in no hurry to build it, and I doubt Bott will ever build it. Perhaps someone locally can buy the CP from Bott. As for 640 I predict it will be many many years before it hits the air anywhere, if at all. I beleive money is short at Birach and he is over 80 years old to boot. Who wants an AM in Terre Haute anyway?